🌈 Приветы из нижней аффилки: Миша Алещенко, бригадир дрочефабрики экс-продюсер онлифанс-хауса, объявил, шо стал глиномесом больше не может скрывать отношения — избранником оказался некий лысый любитель пощекотать очелло Так, скрывать Мишаня, судя по всему, умеет ровным счётом нихуя: ни отношений, ни очков, спизженных у Верки Сердючки после корпоратива, ни маникюра, подсмотренного у Маэстро Иванова 🤥 Штош, человек, …

Channel
ЖП
@cpalenta
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
50,394subscribers
+48,855 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002111275240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cpa_express @cpa_feed @cpalenta @CPANewsFeed @rumorsnews |
| Description | Вся желтая пресса про арбитраж трафика от Джозефа Пулитцера |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 167 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cpalenta |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 50,394 | -6 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 50,400 | -24 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 50,424 | -805 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 51,229 | -6,226 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 57,455 | -3 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 57,458 | -95 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:35 | 57,553 | -112 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 57,665 | -12,832 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 70,497 | -474 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 70,971 | -1,220 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 72,191 | -6 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 72,197 | -543 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 72,740 | -118 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 72,858 | -141 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 72,999 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 72,999 | -61 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 73,060 | -114 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 73,174 | -3,574 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 76,748 | -62 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 76,810 | first reading |
Engagement
402 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.511%
- avg views ÷ 50,394 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 258
- 214 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.82%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 214
- of 402 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 214 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 402 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 55,154 |
| Reactions total | 114 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 03:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,890
- Videos
- ≈2,850
- Links
- ≈5,060
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 51m 50s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 96 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
196 reactions across 85 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 34.7% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 14.3% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 11.2% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 8.67% | |
| 🤡 | 17 | 8.67% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 7.14% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 3.57% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 2.04% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 2.04% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.53% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.53% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 402 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 402 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🎁 Ника Кузьмичева с размахом принарядила своего альфонса в честь трёхлетней годовщины Оказывается, пошёл уже четвёртый год с тех пор, как Русик пригрелся под мамкиным крылышком 🕊 — в честь праздника овнерка CPA BRO подогнала муженьку классический набор содержанки тапки от Louis Vuitton и свежий яблофон.📱 💪 Сам Баргаев, разумеется, разродился в соцсетях простыней и заявил, что тоже вручил мамзеле ответные презенты —…
🤡 Кринж недели На прошлой неделе выиграли KMA BIZ, которые решили монетизировать бэкстейдж своего 18+ контента и продавали его прямо в тг. Смотрим, кто навалил кринжа за последние семь дней. 1️⃣ 4ra Partners поделились секретами качественных ИИ-генераций, где главным наглядным пособием стала их модель с тремя ногами. 2️⃣ Ибра Мехмедов выпустил ИИ-сериал про Миху Джексона во Владикавказе. 3️⃣ SlotXHub наштамповали…
Когда саппорт тупо не открывает сообщения — классический скам-кейс от казино Sykaaa. За последние три недели девчуля сделала депов примерно на ₽300к, всё зачислилось моментально. Она выиграла ₽90к и поставила на вывод — его не обработали, в итоге девка всё слила. Потом она опять подняла до ₽50к, поставила на вывод — как можно понять, чуда не произошло. По правилам Sykaaa, вывод должен занимать от 15 минут до 24 час…
🎁 Овнер One Partners Азир Годжатов отправился обновлять обувной гардероб. Сначала в ход пошли массивные боты Balenciaga, а следом Азиру приглянулись ковбойские сапоги Dsquared2 с креплениями от лыжных ботинок. Осталось понять, что к этим скороходам покупать первым – лыжи или лошадь. Хотя зачем выбирать: судя по всему, тяги рассчитаны сразу на оба сценария. 🐗 Обсудить сплетню в чате можно тут 💵 SERIOUS.PARTNERS - П…
👀 Можно бесконечно смотреть на три вещи: как горит огонь, как течёт вода и как пытается похудеть Ростишка — лехенда снова воюет с пузякой и уже отчитался о минус трёх кило, скромно отдав заслугу слабительному питанию и спорту Так, на этот раз опухший доверил природный бронежилет дефибриллятору шайтан-машине, но со стороны это больше смахивает на плановое УЗИ мамаши с двойней на восьмом месяце, и малыши, судя по всем…
🤡 Дающая каждому Юля Jetton решила не останавливаться на достигнутом и теперь хороводит под удочку подписоты 💃 Видимо, вдохновившись контентом с треш-стримов, мамзель заявила, что готова выполнять любые капризы публики и вываливать этот мусор в соцсетки. 🌚 🤪 Так, например, повинуясь воле стада в голосовалках, дамочка уже успела заточить вокзальное хрючево и депнуть копейку в казик. Видимо, Юлия всерьёз настроена п…
Когда депнуть можно, а вывод невозможен — проект CatAffs снова скамит. Вынужден рассказать вам про очередную схемку кази Котов R7: на этот раз клиентка выиграла ₽1.5 ляма, её акк отправили на повторную верификацию, она подтвердила карту и номер, но все попытки вывода были отменены — некоторые спустя 20 минут ожидания, некоторые спустя сутки, результат один. Саппорт шарашки противоречит сам себе: кто-то пишет, что б…
❌ Вика Бакалова отказывается от Hermes. Подруга закинула удочку про Hermes на день рождения, но Вика от такого презента открестилась, заявив, что годами стоять за сумкой в очереди – удел стада. Позиция мощная, особенно когда у самой гардероб забит самыми дефолтными бегами Louis Vuitton, которые встречаются примерно у каждой второй девочки в инсте. В общем, Birkin – попса для стада, а Pochette и On the Go, видимо, р…
🐸 Кузьмичёва и Баргаев отметили три года отношений. На годовщину Руслан подогнал любимой торт-кальян, а Ника ради праздника расчехлила шикарный костюм Dolce & Gabbana и очки Робокопа. Казалось бы, всё внимание должно быть приковано к луку, но мои глаза предательски уползли чуть выше (см. 4 фото) Если в прошлый раз брови Ники ещё отдавали реверанс Брежневу, то за это время растительность заметно окрепла. Так что на …
🤡 Детище Nova Partners Apex Casino кинуло жидко обслужило вип-игрока — лудик поднял больше 400 ка деревянных и заранее попросил закрыть ему доступ к слотам на время проверки акка, но козиношные забили хуй тянули резину настока, шо бедолага успел слить весь баланс Так, запрос ВиП-МаНаГеРаМ благополучно провисел в игноре больше восьми часов, а обычный саппорт тупа закрывал диалоги и до живого оператора так и не довёл …
Продолжение череды взломов iGaming-платформ: на этот раз пострадали Duelbits и Bitget. Началось с того, что с кошельков криптобиржи Bitget сняли более $350 лямов, а потом это дело массово конвертировали в ETH. Контора подтвердила, что их хакнули, и остановила вывод средств, при этом заверяя, что средства клиентов под удар не попали. Также у них есть фонд защиты пользователей, который в крайнем случае может возместит…
Showing the 12 most recent of 402 posts we hold for @cpalenta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cpalenta edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто победит?
- Бухающему инвалиду детства63%
- Синтоловому пенсионеру43%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Кринж недели
- 1️⃣ Никита Кустов17%
- 2️⃣ JetTon83%
- 3️⃣ Таня Кулагина8%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 402 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@GftZon · 5,7082 postsВот такая вот хуйня, собачка
@ItIsCPALifeSobachka · 9332 postsقرعهکشی | استارز | پرمیوم
@premium_stars_gift · 2,6922 postsАрбитраж трафика с Ивановым
@slovopacana · 146,7272 postsTON Drops Me Gift Giveaway Aggregator
@ton_drops_me_airdrop · 1,9052 postsTonnel Freebies
@TonnelFreebie · 7,6592 postsPGIR NFT
@tonnelir · 3132 postsWe Want You ( Giveaway )
@WeWantYouGuys · 6,7712 postsAffiliate Marketing Info
@Affiliate_Marketing_Info · 131 postTonnel, Portals, Thermos, crypto bot, MRKT Giveaway
@All_Giveaways_1 · 2331 postИз арбитражки в поля. ex.Casinokrisa
@CPA_Farm · 2,9601 postABC Hotel Yerevan | PRE-MAC by Ivanov
@dudilda · 4801 postABC Hotel Yerevan | PRE-MAC by Ivanov
@FatBump · 261 postDaily Giveaways Activity
@FutureDapp · 1,3951 postGifts 369
@gifts369 · 2,9811 postᬉ𝑆𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘸𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘺 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑝
@lpremiiuml · 5,2221 postИз арбитражки в поля. ex.Casinokrisa
@nakoldoval · 2,9591 postPremium Boxes | NFT |Gift قرعه کشی
@Premiumboxes · 1,0801 postMyanmar Game Store
@slotgamer · 41 postТипичный Мамонт
@tmamont · 54,3951 postTonnel free giveaway
@tonnelfree_giveaway · 1,7571 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AFF_inside · 49179 postsTopX Partners
@topxpartners · 2,08546 postshigh profit — low life
@aff_overheard · 1,45334 postsAffPapa! Клуб спящих бизнесменов! Потрачено!
@pacan · 6,67310 postsTHE Network
@T_Network · 1,3638 postsКРАВЧЕНКО
@istrebil · 5,2253 postsРепосты кота
@cat_reposted · 22 postsCPA BRO
@cpabrochannel · 3,0062 postsR2B.News
@reg2bet · 25,3802 postsUP-X PARTNERS | AFF
@upx_partners_aff · 332 postsBROCONF-7 ½ | News
@broconf · 6,9551 postНикита Кустов — СЕО Traffic Cardinal
@cobaka · 2,1891 postИз арбитражки в поля. ex.Casinokrisa
@CPA_Farm · 2,9601 postC-LEVEL DEVILS
@devilsclevel · 10,7641 postGGM | iGaming News
@ggm_news · 1,9281 postJust Marlon
@itsfuckingmarlon · 2,3231 postLuckyCards News
@luckycards_info · 3971 postMostbet Partners
@mostbetpartners · 5,1541 postPhoenix.ink
@phoenixapps_store · 4491 postR2B.Work
@r2bwork · 13,7441 postrumors affiliate
@rumors_affiliate · 2911 postДайте Саше выходной
@sashaneedhelp · 1,8761 postTraffHub | Арбитраж трафика
@traffhub_channel · 6,1961 postTraffnews Radar
@traffnews_radar · 7541 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@varbitrage · 2,023#1
@Fuck_Voice · 3,097#2
@slovopacana · 146,727#3
@aff_overheard · 1,453#4
@pelmennaya_aff · 1,681#5
@affiliatelounge · 962#6
@affiliatebeer · 6,162#7
@DenisenkoDenis · 4,098#8
@marchellord · 325#9
@AdInsideChannel · 2,086#10
@cparu · 3,874#11
@shustoslav · 612#12
@affiliate_party · 669#13
@cpagram · 7,140#14
@damneddiary · 475#15
@AffiliateBuddha · 3,655#16
@adamanttraf · 9,029#17
@MoneyBeatsEvil · 10,955#18
@onlyaff_journal · 1,722#19
@secreetroommedia · 7,016#20
@afftimes · 4,418#21
@ohmyclick · 8,572#22
@affiliatediaries · 6,604#23
@pressaff · 4,264#24
@sashaneedhelp · 1,876#25
@CPA_NEWS_FEED · 1,486#26
@alfaleads_updates · 1,294#27
@Dorvey · 5,187#28
@zorbasmedia · 7,487#29
@Clickbaiters · 1,016#30
@work_life_job · 3,649#31
@bakushevaseo · 8,266#32
@broconf · 6,955#33
@KINZA360_news · 1,252#34
@leosnack_pub · 632#35
@traffotec · 4,167#36
@marlerinogroup · 5,140#37
@cpapoint · 2,863#38
@m1_top_nutra · 6,218#39
@highroller_channel · 5,900#40
@product_marketing_punkrock · 8,751#41
@air4tt · 2,420#42
@pnch_name · 1,384#43
@reg2bet · 25,380#44
@zmrecruiting_1 · 6,683#45
@trafficcardinal · 19,165#46
@pavelprotraffic · 12,880#47
@raketaibr · 4,411#48
@seodreamteamofficial · 7,331#49
@glorypartners · 4,394#50
@owner1w · 24,533#51
@voystrikov · 2,012#52
@fbm_lenta · 2,669#53
@be01team · 18,801#54
@notasha_i_teksty · 695#55
@yellow_web · 16,501#56
@thepartnerkin · 32,256#57
@nikakuzmicheva · 1,349#58
@tamikgdetraffic · 399#59
@pishimarusia · 716#60
@konvertov · 3,339#61
@adamusfb · 6,951#62
@cpaclubmain · 1,370#63
@gambling_feed · 598#64
@adsninja · 9,863#65
@uAntohi · 934#66
@secrettraff · 7,008#67
@lgaming · 2,600#68
@altercpa · 2,431#69
@makemoneyteam_blog · 9,867#70
@gamblnews · 9,257#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Jobs_kirkuk · 32,480
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЖП” (@cpalenta), 50,394 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpalenta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.