Только что осознала, что скоро 1 сентября…

Channel
Оксана Каверина | бухгалтерия, налоги и финансы
@upb_nalogi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,101subscribers
-101 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001781818667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @upb_nalogi |
| Description | Канал для бухгалтеров и предпринимателей про самые горячие новости, кейсы из практики, оптимизацию налогов, любовь к профессии и карьерный рост. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/upb_nalogi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 37,101 | +16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 37,085 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 37,086 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 37,082 | +14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 37,068 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 37,084 | -29 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 37,113 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 37,119 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 37,144 | -22 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 37,166 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 37,169 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 37,177 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 37,196 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 37,202 | first reading |
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.10%
- avg views ÷ 37,101 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,150
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.14%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 79 of 91 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 91 (31 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 104,791 |
| Reactions total | 1,068 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,240
- Videos
- ≈387
- Links
- ≈1,230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,068 reactions across 78 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 545 | 51.0% | |
| 🔥 | 349 | 32.7% | |
| 👍 | 82 | 7.68% | |
| 🎉 | 25 | 2.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 2.06% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 1.12% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 0.936% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.655% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.281% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.187% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.187% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.187% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.094% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,068reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Цифровой рубль – это новая форма национальной валюты. Эту валюту выпускает и контролирует ЦБ. То есть деньги будут храниться на платформе Банка России. Теперь у нас три вида валюты: - Наличные (банкноты, монеты) - Безналичные (деньги на р/с) - Цифровой рубль С 1 сентября 2026 г. вступает в силу Федеральный закон от 23.07.2025 г. № 248-ФЗ «О внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации»…
🤔10❤8😢2🔥1
Коллеги, еще одно важное изменение, которое вступает в силу с 1 сентября (я не понимаю, что они привязались к 1 сентября, итак дел не в проворот с началом учебного года, еще с изменениями разбираться 😤) - это обязательное внедрение цифрового рубля для некоторых компаний 👇🏻
❤2
Дорогие мои, переход на ЭПД, безусловно не может не коснуться бухгалтера. Вы же понимаете, что за этим стоит? И для чего все это делается? Это уже не просто вопрос документооборота: от корректности оформления перевозки теперь будет зависить подтверждение расходов и правомерность вычета НДС при налоговой проверке 🙌🏻 ✔️ Зона ответственности логиста: организовать перевозку и обеспечить оформление транспортных документ…
🔥11❤5❤🔥3
Пояснила свою точку зрения в голосовом 👆🏻
❤4🔥2❤🔥1
Вот знаете, я абсолютно согласна с этим комментарием 💯
💯3❤🔥1👌1
В любой непонятно ситуации иди в бухгалтерию. Так было всегда, бухгалтера должны знать и делать все, почему то так думают
🔥8❤1❤🔥1
Posted without readable text
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4👍4
Я, конечно, понимаю, что сейчас уже пятница вечер, и хочется 🍷 и 💃🏼, а не вот это вот все… Но прилетел вот такой вопрос👇🏻 и я хочу спросить
Вижу ваши ответы 😅 И тут плохая новость: изменения были, есть и будут. Если каждый раз переживать из-за них, нервов не хватит)) Но если есть крепкий фундамент знаний, изменения уже не вызывают паничку. Потому что бухгалтерия – это не план счетов и набор отдельных операций. Это система отражения ВСЕХ фактов хозяйственной деятельности! Какую бы сферу деятельности не затронули эти изменения - на бухгалтерском учете это…
👍6🔥4❤3
Posted without readable text
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @upb_nalogi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое условие необходимо соблюсти, чтобы при подаче уточнённой декларации, увеличивающей сумму налога к уплате, избежать ответственности?
- Подать декларацию до истечения срока её подачи13%
- Иметь положительное сальдо на Едином налоговом счёте (ЕНС) на сумму недостающего налога и пеней86%
- Получить предварительное согласие ИФНС0%
- Уплатить штраф в двойном размере1%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что происходит, если налогоплательщик подал уточнённую декларацию до окончания проверки первичной декларации?
- Проверка первичной декларации продолжается в полном объёме12%
- Проверка первичной декларации прекращается, и начинается проверка уточнённой декларации71%
- ИФНС автоматически штрафует за подачу уточнёнки1%
- Срок проверки первичной декларации продлевается на 3 месяца16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что обязана сделать ИФНС, если в ходе проверки выявлены ошибки, противоречия или несоответствия сведений?
- Сразу вынести решение о привлечении к ответственности0%
- Направить требование о представлении пояснений и/или внесении изменений в декларацию99%
- Приостановить проверку до следующего отчётного периода0%
- Направить уведомление о начале выездной проверки0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
В течение какого срока налогоплательщик должен представить пояснения после получения требования от ИФНС?
- 3 рабочих дня0%
- 5 рабочих дня65%
- 7 календарных дней10%
- 10 рабочих дней25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Во время камеральной проверки вашей декларации инспекция выяснила, что в отчете есть ошибки, которые не привели к занижению суммы налога, но требование о даче пояснений вы получили. Инспектор настаивает, что вы должны подать уточненную декларацию.
- Мы обязаны сдать уточненную декларацию30%
- Мы не обязаны сдавать уточненную декларацию70%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 748,245 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@biznesinalogi_tlg · 82,723
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@netipichniy_buh · 78,718
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
@eglavbukru · 83,400
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
@nalog_gov_ru · 89,996
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
@buhexpert8 · 75,965
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оксана Каверина | бухгалтерия, налоги и финансы” (@upb_nalogi), 37,101 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/upb_nalogi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.