Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,855–4,905 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:16
4,861
-3
13 Sept 2026, 17:58
4,864
-5
10 Sept 2026, 03:55
4,869
-8
4 Sept 2026, 16:21
4,877
-6
31 Aug 2026, 18:07
4,883
-1
26 Aug 2026, 14:14
4,884
-3
23 Aug 2026, 14:47
4,887
-3
19 Aug 2026, 23:51
4,890
-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:35
4,891
-4
13 Aug 2026, 11:35
4,895
-3
10 Aug 2026, 21:31
4,898
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:30
4,899
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:24
4,899
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
159 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
38.4%
💯
27
17.0%
😁
22
13.8%
👍
15
9.43%
🔥
12
7.55%
🤝
7
4.40%
🤣
7
4.40%
⚡
3
1.89%
👀
3
1.89%
🍓
2
1.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня поймала себя на мысли, что меня осуждают. Частный случай в личной переписке.
Меня это задело. Это было в момент сессии со специалистом и она подарила мне фразу: «
и я так делаю!»
Реально, я часто осуждаю и пытаюсь это изменить.
Полегчало…
Говорят, если использовать это постоянно - будет легче…
Мозговой штурм на интересную тему «вернуть ИП с принудительного 5% НДС с начала года, сдали некорректную декларацию, чем черевато?»
Сегодня в 13:00 по Мск в zoom
Все, кто хочет принять участие: комментируйте этот пост, ссылку отправлю в личку
Коллеги, у меня родилась необходимость и желание «помозговать» - устроить мозговой штурм минут на 40.
Есть желающие?
Тема интересная, хочу вернуть ИП с принудительного 5% НДС с начала года, сдали некорректную декларацию, но есть подводные камни. Что думаете?
Вчера попсиховала на работе (как в старые недобрые времена), и мне это очень не понравилось.
За последние полгода я выстроила достаточно комфортный ритм работы и возвращаться в суету и кипиш я не хочу.
Вообще, в последнее время, я стараюсь держаться подальше ото всех у кого «всё горит», чтобы не подцепить снова эту заразу.
Пережив вчерашний вечер уже на сегодня поставила задачи себе что и как надо подкрутить, в то…
Бухгалтер-одиночка ищет коллектив. Недорого 😊
Коллеги, хочу сегодня обсудить с вами одну интересную идею. Пока она ещё не взлетела, не упала и не попросила пересдать РСВ — поэтому очень интересно узнать ваше мнение.
Есть у меня подруга — владелица бухгалтерской компании. Компания уже достаточно большая: около 200 клиентов и 17 сотрудников. И вот недавно умные люди подкинули ей идею:
А что, если приглашать в команд…
Одна из красивейших человеческих способностей - это способность выдерживать напряжение. Это такой высший лэвэл.
«Лэвэл» — это игровой и интернет-сленг, который происходит от английского слова level (уровень)
Как действует человек в неопределенности? Истерит? Мечется? Обижается? Замирает? Прячет голову в песок? Или всё-таки действует выверяя свои шаги? Готов поддержать или у самого силёнок нет?
Выбранная человеком …
❤5💯3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Tata_PRO_nalogi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Налог-Налог.ру @nalognalogru · 24,820 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Нетипичный бухгалтер 🥇 @netipichniy_buh · 78,469 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Журнал "Главбух" @eglavbukru · 83,082 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Бухгалтерский квартал @buhgalteriaLL · 22,437 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
Бухэксперт @buhexpert8 · 75,798 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Евгения Мемрук бухгалтер @biznesinalogi_tlg · 82,355 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Канал "Учёт без забот" @uchetbezzabot_1c · 39,649 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
Оксана Каверина | бухгалтерия, налоги и финансы @upb_nalogi · 37,139 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Светлана Беляева | АФиНА @taxrisk · 25,421 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Переводчик с бухгалтерского @accwhisper · 50,729 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
Контур для бухгалтера @externjournal · 43,297 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Журнал "Упрощёнка" @uproshchenka · 22,827 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Система Главбух @sistemaglavbukh · 25,831 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Бухучет, налоги, 1С @buhru · 35,379 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
1С для бухгалтера ❤️ @buhi1c · 37,935 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРО бухучет и налоги || Горюнова Татьяна” (@Tata_PRO_nalogi), 4,861 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tata_PRO_nalogi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.