Channel
@uglenews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001701264034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uglenews |
| Description | Честно о жизни в Углегорском районе. Старые добрые Углегорские новости. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 29 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uglenews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 30 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 30 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 19.0% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 14.3% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 11.9% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 11.9% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2022 to 1 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
А мне всё пофиг, хоть в анфас, хоть в профиль. ГолосСкок и ее мать-и-мачехе абсолутли по @ую, им лишь бы жгло и горело, что нам люди уй на блюде … главное говно на вентилятор накидать 🤣🤣🤣
Ничего, ничего, скоро ВГК будет национализированна. 😈 Как и Сахалин-2. Точнее государствезированна, ну а нам аборигенам, как всегда х.й с маслом. 😂🙊😱 Кстати, с тыщей поздравляем! Дай Бог успехов вам! Продолжайте поливать грязью углегорского мэра, олигархов, которые грабят наши ресурсы и прочую шваль... 👍👍👍 https://t.me/clubshah/341?single
👍1
Акулы пера, караси письменности, кета и лосось сахалинских сми - великие создатели истории заговора, по старой доброй традиции сеют смуту в ряды единороссов (те ещё дружки и товарищи). Как бы хотелось столкнуть Болотникова с Зазарчук, посмотрим дрогнут ли нервы у мастодонтов островной политики. Или не на того напали… кароч, достаём попкорн и продолжаем смотреть этот экшен.
Старушке Изергиль Захарчук очень хочется на очередной срок вместить свой габаритный зад в кресло депутата Облдумы. Так что она вовсю "делает выборы" в Углегорском районе. Уже и памятник покрасила пофоткала. И бюджетникам по ушам поездила (РДК, библиотека и далее по списку), и на празднике ВГК со сцены кого-то поздравила, и с инвалидами на море съездила, и с жителями во дворах "обкашляла вопросики". Бабуля со своим о…
Ха ха ха … знаете, как это называется, когда Пёсик Барбосик сам себя напугал… Комментариев людям не хватает… Это кто пишет? Самые честные в мире боты самых честных в мире? Ой, да, там же другое))) там кибер-атаки… борьба с мировым злом … Чья б корова мычала… люди как писали так и пишут - нас не заткнешь. Правда в том, что хочется грязи-мрази … и даже в хорошем видится только дурное. https://t.me/clubshah/341
💩1
У вас идёт - дождь, а у нас продолжается концерт. Обратите внимание, как стариковская братия, нацеленная на войну с угольщиками и портовиками игнорирует праздник 🥳 Но нам не привыкать. Мы новое поколение. Продолжаем? https://t.me/newsuglegorsk/59
👍2
Вот это новость!!! Накуся-выкуся!!!
👍1
Решение Путина передать имущество Sakhalin Energy в пользование оператору «Сахалин-2» спровоцирует жёсткую конкуренцию между ЕС и Японией в борьбе за топливо. Такой прогноз сделал аналитик Bloomberg Хироси Хасимото. Он вместе с опрошенными экспертами считает, что такой шаг России сузит мировые топливные рынки и вынудит Токио искать новых поставщиков газа на других рынках, которые и без Японии уже загружены. Ранее …
А вот и независимые и честные.. хочется спросить: как так? Или честно, но чуть-чуть 🤏… чтобы модно было бы манипулировать и управлять, управлять и манипулировать…
Кто там кричал про свободу слова? Углегорские вести и их прихвостни? Хотите прикол? Они меня заблокировали. Все и везде. Правда матка глаза режет? Как много вопросов, но только один ответ: На каждый роток, не накинешь платок. А пока ребята дуют губки, оградившись блоками, словно Роскомнадзор. Я начну вытаскивать фокусы из шляпы.
‼️🆘‼️именно этот номер должен быть расклеян на всех заборах‼️‼️ 8(4243) 244-824 https://t.me/newsuglegorsk/40
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uglenews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Уважаемые знатоки, внимание, вопрос! Что ищет Авдеев в канализации?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2022 to 1 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,149,447 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@uglenews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Углегорские изВЕСТИя” (@uglenews), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uglenews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.