National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 52 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,519–12,648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 14:55
12,624
-9
17 Sept 2026, 08:57
12,633
+1
15 Sept 2026, 08:17
12,632
+2
13 Sept 2026, 15:17
12,630
+14
11 Sept 2026, 18:00
12,616
-4
9 Sept 2026, 05:56
12,620
-4
5 Sept 2026, 20:58
12,624
-1
3 Sept 2026, 15:58
12,625
+4
2 Sept 2026, 07:33
12,621
+1
1 Sept 2026, 10:23
12,620
+2
31 Aug 2026, 08:56
12,618
-2
30 Aug 2026, 08:04
12,620
+1
29 Aug 2026, 09:12
12,619
+4
28 Aug 2026, 07:55
12,615
+10
27 Aug 2026, 06:17
12,605
+4
26 Aug 2026, 04:42
12,601
-1
25 Aug 2026, 01:57
12,602
+17
23 Aug 2026, 13:37
12,585
+14
22 Aug 2026, 00:05
12,571
+10
20 Aug 2026, 15:34
12,561
first reading
Engagement
107 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 12,624 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,110
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 107 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
107 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
31,620
Reactions total
583
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 21:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
54m 15s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,762 reactions across 104 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤯
1,010
21.2%
🤬
838
17.6%
👍
770
16.2%
🙏
446
9.37%
❤
407
8.55%
⚡
269
5.65%
custom 5465446712812261132
173
3.63%
🤡
151
3.17%
😱
141
2.96%
🔥
113
2.37%
🕊
88
1.85%
💯
80
1.68%
😁
80
1.68%
🤣
72
1.51%
🤝
53
1.11%
😢
36
0.756%
custom 5366141421046739194
17
0.357%
🎉
14
0.294%
👏
2
0.042%
🤗
2
0.042%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,906 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
9.35%
10 of 107 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
10
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,530
over 10 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,520
over 97 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqwqxcou
3
8 August 2026
26 August 2026
2Vtzqw5Wi3d
2
14 August 2026
21 August 2026
2VtzqvP5JiN
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2VtzqvWsbQf
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
2Vtzqx6d9eK
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2VtzqxELCUK
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
2VtzqxGuJcb
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Возле ВГСЧ в Шахтёрске горел автобус
В Шахтёрске на улице Интернациональной (возле здания военизированной горноспасательной части) произошёл пожар — вспыхнул автобус марки ПАЗ. Инцидент случился сегодня вечером.
Огонь стремительно распространялся по салону, из‑за чего над местом происшествия поднялось большое облако дыма. Рядом начали собираться дети. Взрослые опасались, что в автобусе может взорваться топливо, рас…
❗️ «Что за издевательство над сельскими жителями!» — проблеме с водой в Лесогорском несколько лет
«Жители Лесогорского в ноябре 2024 года будут с хорошей питьевой водой, соответствующей всем нормам», — красиво обещал господин Филин.
❗️ Проблеме с водоснабжением в Лесогорском несколько лет. При том, что на строительство новой станции водоподготовки для села потрачены большие бюджетные средства❗️
Жители, у которых и…
В Углегорске осудили водителя за пьяную езду и забрали его машину
Вынесен приговор 38‑летнему местному жителю, который управлял автомобилем в состоянии опьянения. Мужчина уже ранее был наказан за отказ от медосвидетельствования — и вновь сел за руль нетрезвым.
Инцидент произошёл в мае этого года. Экипаж ДПС остановил автомобиль нарушителя, проверка подтвердила опьянение: уровень алкоголя составил 0,677 мг/л.
В суд…
❗️ Уже почти 2 недели в Шахтерске — серьёзнейшие проблемы с водой
Всё это время воды в кране либо не было, либо употреблять в пищу её было нельзя. Сегодня утром опять пошла коричневая вода. Затем эту грязную воду отключили.
Шахтёрцы возмущены: предупреждений с указанием конкретных часов отключения власти не давали, а водовозка ходит не по расписанию. Люди пересылают друг другу сообщение «сарафанного радио» о том, ч…
С Днём знаний! 🍬
Сегодня в школах и техникуме Углегорского района отпраздновали День знаний. В образовательных учреждениях прошли торжественные линейки.
Поздравляем школьников, студентов, родителей и педагогов с началом учебного года! Желаем уверенности, терпения и всего самого доброго!
Фоторепортаж Александра Мамаева
🗣 Обсудить на форуме
✉️ Прислать новость
♥️ Мы в МАХ
t.me/uglegorsknews
📰 О жительнице Шахтёрска, которая работала шахтёром, рассказал её сын
В нашу редакцию пришла просьба опубликовать историю женщины, которая в далёкие 60-е работала шахтёром в Углегорском районе.
«Моя мама работала на шахте „Углегорская“, — пишет наш подписчик. — Её звали Раиса Хайруллиновна Чачина.
Это единственное фото, сделанное, когда она была шахтёром. Здесь маме всего 28 лет».
В 1963 году сразу после свадьбы …
Гиперхлорирование воды запустили в Шахтёрске
11 дней назад, 20 августа, в Шахтёрске отключили водоснабжение из-за серьёзных проблем на водохранилище. Вода была настолько грязной, что её нельзя было не только пить, но и мыться ею. Люди в буквальном смысле бегали по дворам за водовозкой и искали по всему Шахтёрску бутилированную воду. Ругались, негодовали и даже юморили (как на этом видео, снятом в моменты обострения …
В Шахтёрске при тушении пожара обнаружено тело мужчины
В ночь на 30 августа в Шахтёрске (район улицы Мира) при тушении пожара в гараже было обнаружено тело 43‑летнего местного жителя с термическими ожогами.
По данным следственного отдела, признаков насильственной смерти не выявлено. Для установления причины смерти назначена судебно‑медицинская экспертиза.
Сейчас следователи выясняют обстоятельства происшествия, а …
🕯️ На предстоящей неделе в Углегорском районе из-за плановых ремонтных работ на сетях будет ограничено энергоснабжение, сообщает «Сахалинэнерго».
31 августа
Углегорск, с 09:00 до 17:00:
• ул. Набережная, 2, 3, 7, 9–11, 11А, 16, 18–20, 20А, 21–25, 30, 32, 38, 42А, 49;
• ул. Южная, 8, 10, 12.
1 и 2 сентября
Краснополье, Медвежье, с 09:00 до 20:00:
• ВНС Медвежьего;
• пер. Молодёжный, 5;
• пер. Совхозный, 1–8;
• ул. Е…
📰 Шахта «Ударновская» — 35 лет назад
На этих фото из архива «Углегорских новостей» — работники шахты «Ударновская» в 1991 году.
🗣 Обсудить на форуме
✉️ Прислать новость
♥️ Мы в МАХ
t.me/uglegorsknews #история
📰 Шахтёры Углегорского района — 45 лет назад
Публикуем вырезки из нашей газеты «Ленинское слово» (с 1991 года — «Углегорские новости»).
На фото 1981 года — работники нескольких шахт.
1. Бригада горнорабочих А. Хрунина шахты «Бошняково»: В. Януш, В. Чернюк, Ю. Ветрыгин, В. Дергачёв, В. Ефимов.
2. Горнорабочий шахты «Углегорская» Ф. Горбунов.
3. Бригадир слесарей шахты «Ударновская» Г. Заводсков.
4. Машинист горновы…
👍23🔥7⚡4❤3custom 53661414210467391943🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @uglegorsknews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@uglegorsknews edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЧП САХАЛИН 🇷🇺 @chpsakhalin · 38,660 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
ЧП, ДТП. Сахалин - Точка отсчёта @tochka_65 · 72,882 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“УГЛЕГОРСКИЕ НОВОСТИ” (@uglegorsknews), 12,624 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uglegorsknews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.