Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,105–17,243 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 18:07
17,121
-14
15 Aug 2026, 01:49
17,135
-18
13 Aug 2026, 15:36
17,153
-12
12 Aug 2026, 15:36
17,165
-12
11 Aug 2026, 13:17
17,177
-13
10 Aug 2026, 16:11
17,190
-8
9 Aug 2026, 15:21
17,198
-13
8 Aug 2026, 15:42
17,211
-13
7 Aug 2026, 18:18
17,224
-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:31
17,227
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:28
17,227
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.523%
avg views ÷ 17,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.6
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.769%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
40 (29 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
3,583
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 41s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1
50.0%
🎉
1
50.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️🔴♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️НУ ЧТО ТВАРЬ, ПОУБИВАЛА РУССКИХ?
Евгений Поддубный сообщает о взятии в плен самой жестокой иностранной наёмницы из ВСУ, которая любила с особой жестокостью издеваться над пленными и погибшими :
«Смотрите на эту тварь, именно она целенаправленно заходила в Курскую область и писала посты что едет в первую очередь «убивать русских людей» эта тварь снимала чудовищные кадры в свой канал, и сегодня при нашем…
Молодая медсестра урологии фоталась голой прямо в кабинете😨
«Подработка» вскрылась, когда пациент узнал кабинет в её откровенном телеграм канале. Кстати, вот он - https://t.me/+VqNd8Xg03f4wNTVi она выглядела так невинно, пока не увидели её Приват канал😅
Адрес больницы там👇
https://t.me/+VqNd8Xg03f4wNTVi
Пойдешь к ней на прием?😂
💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️💂♀️
🎰 X20 на 🎰 LuckyBear — забери своё! 🌈
Не упусти момент: удача не ждёт вечно! 🐻
🛍Лицензированное казино с невероятно высоким RTP!
🔥Один спин = X500 и занос на 276 650₽🥹
🍀 Играть@LuckyBear
🍀 Играть@LuckyBear
⭐️ Введи промокод: LKBx755 — получи до 200 000₽
🪙 250 фриспинов — только для 10 самых удачливых игроков!
🟠 Всё это уже ждёт тебя на LuckyBear! 🟠
➤ Телеграм: @luckybear
🌐 Веб-сайт: luc
Задержанная по делу о теракте в Севастополе призналась в подрыве — за это ей заплатили криптовалютой.
Маргарита Реут родилась в Ярославле, жила в Сочи и регулярно ездила в Крым. В 2023 году открыла турагентство, но закрыла его спустя полтора месяца.
В июле 2025 года её оштрафовали за дискредитацию ВС РФ после инцидента в поезде Самара — Адлер. Тогда, по данным дела, во время атаки БПЛА она кричала: «Так вам и надо,…
❗️🔴♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️ПРЯМО СЕЙЧАС ЭЛИТНЫЙ СПЕЦНАЗ ИЗ КНДР РАЗРЫВАЕТ ХОХЛОВ ПОД ХАРЬКОВОМ.
Военкор Поддубный сообщает : «В эти минуты на Харьковском направлении началась настоящая мясорубка, только вчера на помощь нашим сюда прибыл элитный северокорейский спецназ, а уже сегодня они пошли в первый бой, по имеющейся информации эти парни настоящие звери которые не церемонятся с врагом, только за утро они освободили два села и л…
Блогepшу которая оскорбляла участников СВО пoймали. Жестоко yнизили, зaставили сесть на бутылку и делать минирование рта троим.
Полное видео уже разместили в нашем втором канале.👇
https://t.me/+tDeHLFmpDO82NjJi
На Украине, в Черкасах молодая учительница делала минет своему 18-летнему студенту и записывала это всё на видео, а после занятий скидывала ему свои интимные фотографии и переписывалась с ним о своих сексуальных фантазиях. Ко всему этому у неё был муж, который ничего об этом не знал.
Видео можно посмотреть в канале ЗАПРЕТКА 18+, там выкладывают разный треш про хохлов, у них ещё и не такой пиздец.
⛓️ ХАРДКОР БЕЗ ЦЕНЗУРЫ
ЧТО ПРОИЗОШЛО? - самый отбитый канал 2026 года.
🥩 2 минуты — твой лимит.
Большинство сливаются на 40-й секунде. Остаются единицы.
🎯 Рискни и проверь себя на прочность:(Не для слабонервных)👇
https://t.me/+qv_FeHfEe2dlZDAy
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @topor_treshakt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@topor_treshakt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@greenvpn named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЖЕСТЬ ВИДЕО НОВОСТИ 18+” (@topor_treshakt), 17,121 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topor_treshakt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
