Channel
@saratovlive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,098subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001000029537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saratovlive |
| Created | 28 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saratovlive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 2,098 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 2,102 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,103 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 2,103 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
585 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 225 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 140 | 23.9% | |
| 👍 | 87 | 14.9% | |
| 😁 | 51 | 8.72% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 7.52% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 2.56% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 2.56% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 585reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 11 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пссс, затрещало под Дудаковым кресло Сперва возник вопрос к минздраву от Москальковой по жизненно необходимым лекарствам для льготников. Позже быстрое освобождение от должности его протеже Бориса Мейлаха. Дудаков показывает верх не эффективности. Как долго его будет терпеть губернатор на этой позиции? Так как медицинское направление одно из самых проблемных, там всегда сидели люди близкие с СГ. В данном случае на…
😁7❤5👍1
Пссс, вышка. На днях здесь подвели итоги успешных дел за прошедшую неделю. Сегодня хотим проанализировать высшую школу в регионе. 💪Как и ранее, высокую планку задает саратовский госуниверситет, за последние две недели одни положительные эмоции. Сперва вокруг ботсада (ректор Алексей Чумаченко светится и получает поздравления), а также результатов итогов в рейтинге «Приоритет 2030», где СГУ закрепил свои позиции. Поз…
❤12👍9👎8😁5😢2🤯1
Пссс, неделя была интересная и щедрая на события. В плюсе губернатор Роман Бусаргин. Открылся ботанический сад после реконструкции, продлилась набережная под мост в сторону Затона. Радостные лица жителей, хорошая погода и настроение у горожан. Враги повержены. Птичка-сойка Лена с новым статусом, собирается перелетать на юг, в дальние страны. Глава Аткарска уволен в связи с утратой доверия. Роман Викторович существе…
👍12❤11👎10🔥8🤯2👏1
Пссс, Лена - волк в овечьей шкуре. Претендующий на бесконечную власть в регионе и имеющий большие проблемы во взаимоотношениях с элитой «опальный олигарх» задымил. Все знают ближайшие связи Сергея Георгиевича с Еленой Налимовой, которая никогда ничего не делает без его особых ценных указаний. Которая ведет себя вызывающе в своих пабликах и постах, в результате чего стала фигурантом уголовного дела, а также кандидат…
👎13❤11👍2🔥1
Пссс, взлет одних и падение других. Идут определенные трансформации в местной Единой России – выдвиженцев, которые заняли разные должности, сегодня можно разделить на несколько частей: Значительно укрепился Алексей Антонов, за год стал себя чувствовать более уверенно. Вокруг него образовывается команда достаточно активных людей – Юлия Литневская, Роман Грибов, Вадим Рогожин. Подтянулись и ветераны Сергей Овсяннико…
👎31❤14👍11😁4👏3🤯3
Пссс, империя, созданная экс-мэром Аксененко, (отсидевшим) может начать рушиться. Кто бы что не говорил и как бы не оценивал ситуацию, есть вещи, которые не заметить невозможно. Изменения, связанные с переходом в Верховный суд Генерального прокурора Игоря Краснова, говорят сами за себя. Один из самых эффективных следователей, генпрокурор, который инициировал и всегда поддерживал возвращение в госсобственность актив…
❤14👎10😁7🔥6👍5
Пссс, ректор СГТУ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Пссс, кто может быть самым хорошим кандидатом на пост нового ректора СГТУ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎24😁12🔥3🤯3❤2😢2
Пссс, почему многие молчат? Этим и отличается наш многочисленный разношерстный элитарный круг, к сожалению, он инертен, безволен, безынициативен в основе своей….Привыкли, чтобы их никто не беспокоил, чтобы нежились в лучах собственного мироздания. Где ректорское сообщество? Одна может только периодически запевать Солнце в Монако, а другой вспоминать Аксененко (который весь город искромсал на наделы для своих дружко…
👎17❤8👍5👏3🤯1😁1
Пссс, неделька выдалась… Крайне редко наш Роман Бусаргин выходит в публичное поле с важными заявлениями. Но на этой неделе губернатор разродился аж дважды в своем телеграм канале и на местном телике. На фоне котлована пояснил за шмот всем шантажерам и манипуляторам общественным сознанием, что решение по строительству школы в парке «территория детства» им принято окончательнее окончательного. Работа уже во всю кипит …
👎24👍6🔥4🤯3❤2😁2👏1😢1
Формирование общественного мнения в зоопарке Ленинского
👎13🔥11👍4👏3😁3
Что мы видим👀🧠 Региональный депутатский блок показал сплоченность и консолидацию. Юлия Литневская, большая молодец, крепко стоит на ногах, имеет четкую позицию, умна и образована. Всегда выступает на рубежах. Роман Грибов показал себя грамотным и конкурентноспособным, опытным, не боится сказать правду, встать на защиту, принципиальный человек. Вадим Рогожин долгие годы переносит нападки «мелкого», который перемолол …
👎15👍14❤10👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saratovlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Пссс, ректор СГТУ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Пссс, кто может быть самым хорошим кандидатом на пост нового ректора СГТУ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 11 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 283,145 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пыльный Сратов” (@saratovlive), 2,098 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saratovlive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.