Channel
@tomdabassman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
5,783subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001171960166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tomdabassman |
| Description | Demokratie-Ultra. Meinungsfreiheit-Ultra. Born @32ct/l Super https://twitter.com/tomdabassman https://www.instagram.com/the__real_tom/ |
| Created | 24 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tomdabassman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 5,783 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 5,782 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 5,782 | first reading |
48 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 196,117 |
| Reactions total | 4,038 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,411 reactions across 40 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 345 | 10.1% | |
| 🤮 | 320 | 9.38% | |
| 🤣 | 291 | 8.53% | |
| 😁 | 271 | 7.94% | |
| 👍 | 260 | 7.62% | |
| 💯 | 254 | 7.45% | |
| 🔥 | 247 | 7.24% | |
| 👏 | 162 | 4.75% | |
| 💩 | 120 | 3.52% | |
| 🦄 | 118 | 3.46% | |
| 🎉 | 108 | 3.17% | |
| 🍾 | 94 | 2.76% | |
| ❤ | 80 | 2.35% | |
| 🤷♂ | 79 | 2.32% | |
| 🍌 | 70 | 2.05% | |
| 🤬 | 65 | 1.91% | |
| 🏆 | 61 | 1.79% | |
| 🙈 | 57 | 1.67% | |
| 👀 | 51 | 1.50% | |
| 👌 | 44 | 1.29% | |
| 33 further kinds | 314 | 9.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,038reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Diese Ausschnitte aus "hart aber fair", vom Tag nachdem die AfD 2016 in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit 21 Prozent zweitstärkste Kraft geworden war, sind ein Stück Zeitgeschichte. Nach der Silvesternacht 2015 in Köln und vier islamistisch geprägten Terrorattacken überbieten sich Kanzleramtsminister Altmaier (CDU), Gesine Schwan (SPD) und "Experte" Münkler (HU Berlin) in Gaslighting bis hin zur glatten Lüge. Besonders biza…
💯8💩5😈1
https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/article6a63698eb9a97a04edfd93d9/schwarz-gruppe-kehrt-zurueck-zum-verbrenner-darum-verbietet-lidl-elektro-dienstwagen.html "Ausgerechnet die Schwarz-Gruppe bleibt nun beim Verbrenner – und versagt so den Mitarbeitern den Steuervorteil. „Aufgrund der hiesigen Volatilität auf dem Automobilmarkt und veränderter regulatorischer Rahmenbedingungen haben wir uns entschieden, vollelektrische Fa…
🏆24😁8🔥3🤣3👍1
https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/europa/ungarn-praesident-baka-102.html Ungarns neuer rechtsnationaler Premier und Liebling der deutschen Linksgrünen Magyar hat mit seiner Zweidrittelmehrheit durch einen Verfassungsputsch den Präsidenten ausgetauscht, und somit Orbáns Marionette durch seine eigene ersetzt. https://x.com/i/status/2087212114435785050
🍌21🤡7🤷♂3👏2😱2🤷♀1
Großfamilien, Clans, Baseballschläger, Hämmer, Todesschüsse, Drogenkrieg - wo zum Teufel leben wir eigentlich? Und mindestens jeder zweite von denen bekommt direkt Kohle vom Staat. Also von dir und mir. Warnung: Explizite Gewalt https://www.focus.de/panorama/grossfamilien-gehen-mit-haemmern-und-aexten-aufeinander-los_8b5c354a-e75d-4f5e-b511-3ca774f0cbcd.html https://x.com/i/status/2087191060120326352
🤮31🤷♂13🔥7💯4🍌3🦄3❤1💩1
Schwesig hat vor einigen Tagen im Wahlkampf den heute 16jährigen eine abschlagsfreie Rente im Jahr 2073 garantiert, und prompt ist sie über Nacht die "beliebteste Politikerin Deutschlands". So wurde jahrzehntelang gewählt. Den Zuschlag bekam immer die Partei, die die meisten unbezahlbaren Sozialleistungen "vom Staat" versprochen hat, und dieser kollektive Selbstbetrug wird wohl nie enden. https://x.com/i/status/208…
🤡34🙈24🤣12💅5😁3❤2💯2🦄2
Es gibt ein Wort, das die deutsche Narretei der Dach-PV-Anlagen beschreibt: Utility-Death-Spiral Schön, nicht wahr? Das ist die Netz-Kosten-Spirale, die bei dezentralen Photovoltaik-Anlagen seit Jahren diskutiert wird – und in Deutschland besonders ausgeprägt ist. Der Mechanismus in Kurzform 1. Der Haushaltsstrompreis ist hoch (aktuell oft 30–40 ct/kWh brutto). Ein großer Teil davon sind fixe bzw. quasi-fixe Koste…
👍20⚡6❤4👀3🔥2🤔2
Einer der ersten Wissenschaftsjournalisten im deutschen Fernsehen, Jean Pütz (89), erkärt der CSU den Fusionsreaktor! https://x.com/i/status/2087071033245257935
👏24👍11👎1🤔1😁1
Ralf Schulers schonungslose Abrechnung mit der CDU-Brandmauer "Man kann [die Brandmauer] nur erklären mit Todesangst, der Angst unterzugehen als etablierte Partei." "Wer erklärt, man dürfe mit Höcke nicht sprechen, sieht den politischen Mitbewerber als Unmenschen. Dann kann man sich nicht christliche Partei nennen." "Als Politiker stehe ich in der Demut vor dem Volk, von dem alle Macht ausgeht. Und nicht umgekehrt."…
👌40👏25🏆13🗿3👍2
Der EU ist ein neuer, erfolgreicher Bürokratie-Anschlag auf Kleinunternehmer gelungen. Wegen der neuen Verpackungsverordnung PPWR beenden gerade Tausende Händler ihren Versand ins EU-Ausland (!), weil Aufwand und Kosten in keinem Verhältnis mehr zum Ertrag stehen. Für die Großen, insbesonders Amazon, ist das wie immer gar kein Problem. Diese Aktionen sind kein Versehen, sie sind Absicht. In der neuen, nachhaltigen, …
🤮59🔥12🤬10❤6💩4🤷♂4🖕2😡2
Wir brauchen Maßnahmen! https://x.com/i/status/2086719590264934508
🤡43🍾15😁8🔥4💩1😡1
Das, was Till Brönner sagt! https://x.com/i/status/2086696627050267018
👏47💯30👍14❤3🤓1
https://www.t-online.de/unterhaltung/stars/id_101380998/collien-fernandes-macht-kontaktabbruch-ihrer-tochter-oeffentlich.html Nächster Schicksalsschlag für Collien Fernandes: Nachdem es die von ihr behaupteten Porno-Deepfakes gar nicht gibt, hat auch noch ihre Teenager- Tochter "den Kontakt abgebrochen" und ist lieber bei ihrem Vater, dem nicht-Porno-Deepfake-Produzent. So sad! https://x.com/tomdabassman/status/208…
🎉38🤷♀28😁13🖕5❤4👌2🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @tomdabassman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@tomdabassman edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 8,874 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TheRealTom (tm) - Trusted Flagger” (@tomdabassman), 5,783 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomdabassman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.