Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Magnit

Channel

Magnit

@magnitofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,365subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001603382141
TypeChannel
Username@magnitofficial
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/magnitofficial

Growth

6,3516,3656,3586 August 2026 — 6,360 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,360 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,351 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,363 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,365 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,349–6,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:246,365+2
12 Aug 2026, 22:256,363+12
9 Aug 2026, 14:146,351-9
7 Aug 2026, 00:286,360no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:486,360first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.8%
avg views ÷ 6,365 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,040
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held26 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total79,044
Reactions total3,427
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 21s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,427 reactions across 26 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 533940868130803434667019.6%
57516.8%
👍53415.6%
🔥35410.3%
2988.70%
🤯2066.01%
😁1323.85%
😭1213.53%
🤝772.25%
👏631.84%
💯631.84%
custom 5422592817622980772571.66%
❤‍🔥541.58%
🤣501.46%
custom 5431550246796700309491.43%
custom 5292126606117085047230.671%
custom 5422398487532704899190.554%
😢180.525%
custom 5462884438402703708140.409%
👀90.263%
13 further kinds411.20%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 26 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @magnitofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC674 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Navbatdagi ko'rsatuvga biroz kechroq bo'lsa ham kirishdim. Oilaviy ishlarim sabab ulgura olmadim, lekin bugundan hammasini yana eski relslarga qaytadi. Ochig'i korrupsiya haqidagi ko'rsatuvim juda katta mudattda 100k tomosha yig'gani meni ajablantirdi. Ko'prog'ini kutgandim, demak tushundimki odamlar hali bunday loyihalarga tayyor emas, korrupsiyani yo'q qilishga qiziqmaydi, afsus.

48💔9🔥9❤‍🔥8custom 5339408681308034346611

11 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,660 views152 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Hayotiymi? Jizzami? @magnitofficial

custom 533940868130803434681🔥25😭20💯12102😁2

10 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈2,480 views143 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Oynaga qarab o‘zingizga yoqasiz-u, lekin selfi tushganda "Nega burnim buncha katta?" deb siqilganmisiz? Hatto shuni deb plastik operatsiya qildirmoqchi bo‘lganlar qancha! AQShdagi plastik jarrohlar oxirgi paytlarda bir g‘alati holatga e’tibor berishdi: yoshlar yopirilib kelib, "Burnimni kichraytirib bering" deb so‘ray boshlashgan. Shifokorlar esa bemorlarning bu muammosini tushuna olmay, olimlarga murojaat qilishadi

👍58😁47custom 533940868130803434616125👀3👾2

10 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,930 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Dunyodagi eng antiqa korrupsion ish @magnitofficial

🔥4110👍4custom 53394086813080343464

8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈2,260 views112 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Tasavvur qiling, muzlatkichdagi meva va sabzavotlar kabi, hamyoningizdagi pullar ham vaqt o‘tishi bilan aynib, yaroqsiz holga kelib qolsa nima qilgan bo‘lardingiz? Ularni yillab sandiqda saqlarmidingiz yoki qadrsizlanib qolmasidan oldin zudlik bilan sarflashga harakat qilarmidingiz? Bir qarashda mutlaqo telbanamo eshitiladigan aynan shu g‘oya bir vaqtlar butun boshli shaharni halokat yoqasidan qaytarib qolgan. Voqea

5520🔥19👏6custom 53394086813080343466custom 54225928176229807725🌚1

8 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,360 views223 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bir yig'ilib Nolanni Odisseyasini ko'rmaymizmi?

👍1323422custom 533940868130803434618custom 542259281762298077211🔥4👨‍💻2

6 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈3,140 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Odamlarning uylariga kirib ozodalikni tekshirayotgan hokimlar videosini ko‘rgandirsiz? Eng qizig‘i bu holat birinchi marta emas, turli davrlarda turli mamlakatlarda bunday voqealar bo‘lgan, keling ularni sizga tanishtiray: SSSR — SSSRning dastlabki yillarida, ayniqsa "kommunalka" (umumiy yashash xonadonlari) deb ataluvchi uylarda "sanitariya komissiyalari" tuzilgan. Bu komissiyalar xonadonlarga kirib, xonalarning, o

34custom 533940868130803434629👍12🔥9🗿3custom 54225928176229807723😁1

5 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈3,410 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hozir aytadigan gaplarim katta ehtimol sizga yoqmaydi, lekin olimlar do’stlik borasida muhokama qilishga arzigulik mavzuni o’rganishdi. Olimlarni fikriga ko’ra kim bilan do’st bo’lishingiz sizni moliyaviy holatingizga umuman bog’liq emas, balki dunyoqarashingizga bog’liq. Olimlarda bu narsani “Gomofiliya” deb atashadi. Bilaman, boshqa ma’nodagi so’zlarga o’xshab ketadi, ammo bu boshqa mavzu. Olimlarning fikriga ko’

👍6430🔥20custom 533940868130803434612custom 54225928176229807727❤‍🔥3👀2

5 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC≈3,110 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Magnit loyihasining ohirgi sonida Gulnora Karimova bilan yuz bergan korrupsion holat haqida telegram sahifamda ma'lumot beraman degandim, mana o'sha faktlar, o'qing, maza qiling, bilib oling!

👏57custom 53394086813080343462212🤯10custom 54225928176229807726👍2😡2

5 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈3,140 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Oramizda 20-yildan beri aloqa sim-kartalarini ishlatayotganlar bormi? Bor bo’lsa unda har yil telefon uchun to'lagan pullaringizning bir qismi qayoqqa ketganini hozir bilib olasiz. 2000-yillar boshida O'zbekistonga yirik xorijiy telekom kompaniyalar kirmoqchi bo'ladi. Lekin litsenziya olish uchun bitta odamdan ruxsat kerak edi. U prezident Karimovning katta qizi Gulnara Karimova. Uni rasmiy lavozimi yo'q, shunchaki

🤯53custom 53394086813080343462614🔥12custom 542259281762298077221😭1

5 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈3,050 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Sun’iy intellektga oid bo‘lgan eng shov-shuvli voqea yaqindagina sodir bo‘ldi. Matn biroz uzunroq bo‘ladi, lekin uni o‘qishingiz shart! Shu hafta sun’iy intellekt olamidagi eng muhim platformalardan biri bo‘lgan Hugging Face xakerlik hujumiga uchradi. Ma’lumot uchun bu deyarli butun SI sanoati foydalanadigan ma’lumotlar bazasi, xullas SIning GitHubi hisoblanadi. Kiberhujum odatdagilaridan farq qilmasdi, ammo Huggin

🤯57custom 53394086813080343462512custom 54225928176229807726👀31🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC≈2,740 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

F1 poygachisi Gabriel Bortoletoning bo‘yin mushaklarini oddiy odamnikidan farqini tomosha qiling. Bu tajriba orqali shu ayon bo‘ladiki, Formula 1 poygachilari ko‘tara oladigan bosimga oddiy odamlar bardosh bera olmaydi. Poyga vaqtida poygachi bo‘yniga 5–6 g gacha ortiqcha yuk tushadi. Shuning uchun maxsus tayyorgarliksiz masofani ushlab turish deyarli imkonsiz. @magnitofficial

🤯56👍21custom 533940868130803434611🔥6custom 542259281762298077253😇2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @magnitofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 365,008 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Magnit” (@magnitofficial), 6,365 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magnitofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.