👁 Facial recognition in your local NHS pharmacy ▶️WATCH: https://youtube.com/shorts/BP1DoyU477U Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ
🤬17❤3😱1
Signed Lilith

Channel
@NHS100k
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,885subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001570920503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NHS100k |
| Created | 11 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NHS100k |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 3,885 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 3,889 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 3,892 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 3,892 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 February 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,442 |
| Reactions total | 50 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
369 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 105 | 28.5% | |
| 🤬 | 86 | 23.3% | |
| ❤ | 77 | 20.9% | |
| 👏 | 35 | 9.49% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 9.21% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 5.42% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 1.36% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.08% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👁 Facial recognition in your local NHS pharmacy ▶️WATCH: https://youtube.com/shorts/BP1DoyU477U Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ
🤬17❤3😱1
Signed Lilith
"...the minister highlighted that "the UK is now the most targeted country in Europe for cyber attacks." Again, if your country is the most targeted in Europe, why persist building a new national identity system that could be a main target. https://www.computerweekly.com/opinion/Does-the-Cyber-Security-and-Resilience-Bill-make-you-feel-secure 🚨 FOLLOW US: X | Telegram
🤬11
Signed Lilith
Help promote cash sales on your high street by printing and handing out this leaflet . It's a softer approach to keep cash alive by encouraging businesses and customers to recognise its in their best finincial interests and a great conversation starter.
👍12❤4👏1😁1
Signed Lilith
🪪 “You will now need to show your papers just to go onto a social media site.” A social media ban will “incur an enormous privacy intrusion for the British public.” Silkie Carlo reacts to Starmer’s social media ban announcement, on BBC News. ▶️WATCH: https://youtube.com/shorts/Q9hU4w5imf8 Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ
🤬19😱2🔥1
Signed Lilith
⛔️ The UK government wants to ban social media for children under 16. But banning social media for kids only puts them in greater danger. They will be pushed to use VPNs — and unlock far worse illegal content. We’ve seen this before. When the Russian government banned Telegram, 95% of Russian teenagers kept using it. They just moved to VPNs. Same in Iran. Parents already have the tools to restrict their kids’ di…
👍9
Signed Lilith
For your interest-- your belongings, your choice. In an electronic age, we have long dealt with who owns what digitally. Do you own it, or does someone else? Remember "you will own nothing and be happy"? Google is creating that with an Android lock-down in September 2026: apps pre-approved by Google, and only if developers submit key information and traceable information. Another form of control. You should be able t…
🔥11👍4❤1😁1
Signed Lilith
Reform UK want to bulldoze our NHS, and replace it with a sub standard, extortionate and dangerous, private insurance based health care system like America instead. Our esteemed GP and NHS champion @drbobgill will be talking about this in our MEMBERS ONLY Zoom 8pm THIS Thursday. JOIN US to watch it. Ask the good Doctor Bob a question! https://www.workerspartygb.org/join #NHS #Private #Insurance #Healthcare #Worke…
🔥4🤬3❤1
Signed Lilith
🚨 DIGITAL ID - they're coming for our freedoms. Masked as voluntary at first but sure to be mandatory if we accept it, this government via the King's Speech have doubled down on Digital ID and introduced a new bill - Digital Access to Services Bill - we must fight back now to stop this madness before it spreads and takes hold. Do your part with our stickers, leaflets and campaign. No Digital ID Stickers: https://n…
👍3
Signed Lilith
🚨 Giving Palantir and staff from other firms unlimited access to identifiable patient data before it is pseudo-anonymised is completely and utterly unacceptable. 🤖 What happens if there is a serious supply-chain hack and databreach with one of these firms? FULL STORY: https://archive.md/nu26P 👉 FOLLOW US: X | Telegram
🤬16🤮5❤1
Signed Lilith
ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT: The government’s Digital ID consultation closes on 5 May: https://roadmap-for-modern-digital-government.campaign.gov.uk/digital-id-consultation/ Let’s be honest: consultations are often used to rubber-stamp decisions already made. But if you don’t respond, it’s even easier for them to pretend there’s no opposition. So take a few minutes to complete it - we’ve also put together a guide to help y…
👍9
Signed Lilith
"Banks are closing down, cash is being removed, digital ID is being introduced, facial recognition cameras are being enforced and a social credit system is on the horizon. We the people have to stop this. Let me translate that for you. Banks are closing down? No, they’re consolidating. You’re being moved out of the real banking system and into the control grid. Every branch they close is a door slamming on your fin…
❤11👍9
Signed Lilith
4 Rallys across 4 nations! Saturday 25th April 2026. London - Belfast - Cardiff - Edinburgh - all on the same day with a 1.30pm start. Scrapping Digital ID is the single most important mission we have, and we must succeed. Almost 3 million people signed the petition to scrap digital ID. The government have not u-turned, they are bringing it in through the back door. We must rise up together. We must make our voi…
👍17❤1🔥1😁1
Signed Lilith
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NHS100k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,137,991 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NHS100k named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NHS100k.com” (@NHS100k), 3,885 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NHS100k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.