Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Богдан Цырдя| Bogdan Țîrdea.

Channel

Богдан Цырдя| Bogdan Țîrdea.

@tirdea

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,234subscribers

-218 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206017489
TypeChannel
Username@tirdea
Created9 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tirdea

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tirdea/112995 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC@KpMoldova/1446095 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC1.002.9 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@KpMoldova16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0085 minutes@KpMoldova (10–6)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 384 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,2349,4669,3506 August 2026 — 9,452 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,452 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,453 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,440 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,443 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,438 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,461 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,466 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,451 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,442 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,433 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,414 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,398 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,387 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,357 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,325 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,312 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,313 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,312 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,289 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,275 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,256 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,240 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,234 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net -218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,199–9,501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 08:409,234-6
2 Nov 2026, 15:179,240-16
30 Oct 2026, 18:389,256-19
27 Oct 2026, 16:149,275-14
24 Oct 2026, 20:099,289-23
21 Oct 2026, 13:419,312-1
15 Oct 2026, 01:079,313+1
11 Oct 2026, 16:219,312-13
5 Oct 2026, 14:549,325-32
28 Sept 2026, 00:179,357-30
18 Sept 2026, 05:019,387-11
13 Sept 2026, 19:219,398-16
10 Sept 2026, 05:369,414-19
4 Sept 2026, 21:419,433-9
1 Sept 2026, 01:089,442-9
28 Aug 2026, 19:239,451-15
26 Aug 2026, 03:329,466+5
22 Aug 2026, 23:489,461+23
19 Aug 2026, 07:479,438-5
12 Aug 2026, 18:249,443first reading

Engagement

586 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 9,234 subscribers
Avg views / post
987
188 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
190
of 586 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held586 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total185,631
Reactions total14,320
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 11:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈32,000
Videos
≈49,900
Links
≈23,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 36m
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 316 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

48,949 reactions across 566 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6,51713.3%
😡6,48613.3%
💯5,98112.2%
😁5,87312.0%
🤮3,8747.91%
🤣3,6397.43%
🤬2,8225.77%
🔥2,3064.71%
🤡2,1524.40%
😱1,5163.10%
👏1,4873.04%
💊1,2642.58%
🤔1,1922.44%
🙏1,1432.34%
😢6551.34%
🤯6281.28%
🥰5671.16%
👎5311.08%
🙉2850.582%
🎉220.045%
1 further kind90.018%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 582 of the 586 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50,416 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 586 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 584 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tirdea. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 586 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 46 of 190 posts held from the last 30 days (24.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 11:49 UTC81 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Мединский про территориальные вопросы: «Каждая пядь российской земли будет Россией возвращена так или иначе».

🔥8🙏5👍2

11 Nov 2026, 11:37 UTC179 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Заявления главы российской делегации Мединского по итогам переговоров с Украиной и США в Абу-Даби: • тема европейской системы безопасности была центральной, «где-то удалось найти взаимопонимание, где-то - нет. Миру нужна новая обновленная система безопасности»; • разговор будет продолжен; • C Европой переговоров не было, «не понимаем о чем с ними говорить, ни одного конкретного предложения от Европы не получали. О…

🥰9🤣5🙏1

11 Nov 2026, 11:30 UTC230 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Второй день переговоров РФ, США и Украины в Абу-Даби завершен "Одним из итогов переговоров стал обмен пленными", — сообщает ТАСС со ссылкой на источник. Сами переговоры во второй день продлились менее двух часов. Смотри

🤔8

11 Nov 2026, 11:27 UTC241 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Киев отклонил новое предложение США о пересмотре границ, которое могло бы разблокировать мирное урегулирование с Россией — The Telegraph. БС в TG

😡13🤔1

11 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC342 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔴🔴🔴Федор Гагауз: Появившаяся в публичном пространстве информация о том, что у меня якобы есть румынское гражданство, является низкопробной фальшивкой. Её цель — ввести людей в заблуждение. Заявляю со всей ответственностью: у меня нет и никогда не было гражданства Румынии. Это очередная провокация, и совсем не случайно она появилась именно сейчас, за несколько дней до выборов Башкана Гагаузии.

👍25💯1

11 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC447 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🆒🔔❌Очередное затонувшее в Ормузском проливе коммерческое судно.. Судно принадлежало ОАЭ.

🙏12👍5🤬2🤔1

11 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC799 views60 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Влад Бэтрынча: кто продал имущество армии? Мы обратились в Прокуратуру! Кто ослабил Национальную армию? Кто продал имущество, земельные участки, самолёты и вертолёты, принадлежавшие Республике Молдова? Правительства, позиционировавшие себя как подлинно проевропейские. И почему именно те, кто распродавал это имущество, сегодня говорят о необходимости перевооружения армии? Мы обратились в прокуратуру с требованием …

👍58😁2

11 Nov 2026, 08:06 UTC831 views108 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Новая страшилка? Перчун: «Если PAS потеряет власть, европейский курс может оказаться под угрозой. Но мы строим партию на сто лет». P.S. То есть PAS 100 лет хочет быть у власти? Господа, вы ухи наелись? Morari News.

😡75🤡15🤬9🤣6😁2🤮1

11 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC≈1,860 views73 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Павел Войку, экс-министр обороны: Директор СИБ заявляет, что Республика Молдова стала не потребителем, а «поставщиком безопасности». Но как можно говорить о безопасности, когда персональные данные сотен тысяч граждан не были защищены, а мошеннические сети продолжают действовать на территории страны? Этот скандал касается не только утечки данных, но и халатности ответственных учреждений. Руководить ими должны проф…

💯72😁1

11 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC859 views77 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Ирландия. Экс-президент США Джо Байден с женой приехал в Дублин. Но их встретила толпа пропалестинских демонстрантов криками «Кровь на твоих руках!» На всякий случай закидали банками и прочим мусором. Дед и после ухода из власти любимчик толпы. 😊

👏65😁6🤡3💯2😱1

11 Nov 2026, 07:21 UTC835 views97 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Дедушка старый, ему все равно. 😊

💊69😁12🤣6😡4🤮3👏2👎1

11 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC837 views82 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

А в 2027 будут местные выборы. Там Россия активизируется ещё сильнее. Боимся представить, как Россия активизируется на президентских. А они совсем рядом, в 2028. 😱

😁51💊21👍3🤡3🤣1🤬1😡1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 586 posts we hold for @tirdea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tirdea edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KP Moldova
@KpMoldova · 33,212
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
Молдавский Крот
@md_krot · 31,792
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
Молдова сейчас
@moldova_acum · 27,087
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 September 2026
Point.md
@PointNews · 61,287
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Подслушано в Молдове
@podslushano_md · 20,466
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
Молдова онлайн
@onlinemd24 · 18,491
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 October 2026
INDEX🇲🇩 CREDIBIL
@indexMLD · 20,666
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
Moldova 24
@newsmd24 · 20,645
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
Кишинёв INFO 🇲🇩 НОВОСТИ
@chisinau_info1 · 43,168
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
Insider Moldova
@insider_md · 34,936
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Все новости Приднестровья | ПМР
@pravda_pmr · 27,448
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
Новости Приднестровья | ПМР
@novostipmrcom · 22,395
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
luchianiuc.com
@luchianiuc_com · 24,478
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
Moldova Liberă
@moldovalibera · 43,195
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Ungureanu 112
@Ungureanu112 · 46,639
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Треш Киш
@trech_kich · 30,701
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 September 2026
Poliția Republicii Moldova
@Politia_Republicii_Moldova · 33,260
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
OBSERVATORUL
@observatorul · 20,692
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Moldova NEWS
@moldovanewsmd · 50,355
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Богдан Цырдя| Bogdan Țîrdea.” (@tirdea), 9,234 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tirdea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.