Channel
@vladfilat1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,782subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001559858254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vladfilat1 |
| Created | 12 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vladfilat1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 2,782 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 2,785 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 2,782 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 2,783 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 2,783 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 64,315 |
| Reactions total | 564 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
474 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 265 | 55.9% | |
| 🔥 | 83 | 17.5% | |
| 💯 | 51 | 10.8% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 10.3% | |
| 🤝 | 15 | 3.16% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 1.90% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.211% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.211% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 564reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ ЛДПМ о новой налоговой политике Правительства Либерал Демократическая Партия Молдовы приняла к сведению концепцию новой налоговой политики, представленную премьер-министром Василе Тофаном, и констатирует, что за техническими формулировками и оптимистичными заявлениями Правительства скрывается очевидная суть: исполнительная власть пытается покрыть бюджетный дефицит, ставший следствием пяти лет правления ПДС…
👍13💯10🔥5
DECLARAȚIA PLDM cu privire la noua politică fiscală a Guvernului Partidul Liberal Democrat din Moldova a luat act de concepția noii politici fiscale prezentate de prim-ministrul Vasile Tofan și constată că, dincolo de formulele tehnice și mesajele optimiste, esența acesteia este clară: Guvernul încearcă să acopere deficitul bugetar creat de cinci ani de guvernare PAS prin majorarea poverii fiscale. Executivul urmăr…
👍11💯8🔥3❤1
«У меня есть проект для Молдовы». Персонализация политического дискурса и осуществление государственной власти от собственного имени «У меня есть проект для Молдовы». Именно этой формулой Василе Тофан воспользовался при своём самовыдвижении на должность Премьер-министра, опубликовав программу в Facebook. После утверждения в должности та же логика прослеживается во многих его публичных выступлениях: «я принял решение…
👍16🔥2💯1🤝1
„Eu am un proiect pentru Moldova”. Personalizarea discursului și exercitarea puterii în nume propriu „Eu am un proiect pentru Moldova.” Această formulă, utilizată de Vasile Tofan încă din momentul autopropunerii sale pentru funcția de prim-ministru, prin proiectul publicat pe Facebook, a devenit una dintre caracteristicile discursului său public. După învestire, aceeași logică se regăsește în numeroase intervenții: …
👍13💯6❤1🤔1🤝1
Майя Санду, Игорь Гросу, Василе Тофан, вся правящая власть и все ваши трубадуры, перестаньте поучать граждан Молдовы и обвинять их в энергетическом, гидрологическом или любом другом кризисе, который вы сами создали за последние пять лет. Граждане Молдовы проявили больше терпения, чем проявил бы любой другой народ. Они выдержали самые высокие в Европе тарифы на газ и электроэнергию. Они пережили беспрецедентный эконо…
👍25🔥11❤4
Maia Sandu, Igor Grosu, Vasile Tofan, întreaga guvernare și voi, toți trubadurii lor, încetați să le țineți lecții moldovenilor și să-i învinovățiți pentru criza energetică, hidrologică sau pentru orice altă criză creată de voi în ultimii cinci ani. Moldovenii au avut mai multă răbdare decât ar fi avut orice alt popor. Au suportat cele mai mari tarife la gaze și energie din Europa. Au îndurat o criză economică fără …
👍22💯12🔥4❤3
ДЕКЛАРАЦИЯ ЛДПМ о разъяснениях Правительства по поводу реформы местного публичного управления Либерал Демократическая Партия Молдовы приняла к сведению разъяснения Правительства, представленные в ответ на заявление ЛДПМ о реформе местного публичного управления. Их анализ подтверждает один из ключевых выводов ЛДПМ: так называемая реформа МПУ уже не соответствует ни реальным потребностям страны, ни тем обещаниям, кото…
👍10🔥6👌2
Declarația PLDM privind precizările guvernului pe margine reformei Administrației Publice Locale Partidul Liberal Democrat din Moldova a luat act de precizările făcute de Guvern ca reacție la declarația PLDM privind reforma administrației publice locale. Analizând aceste explicații, constatăm că ele confirmă una dintre criticile esențiale formulate de PLDM: așa numita reformă APL nu mai corespunde necesităților și p…
❤15🔥5👍2🤝2
ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ ЛДПМ О провале реформы местного публичного управления Либерал Демократическая Партия Молдовы (ЛДПМ) заявляет, что реформа местного публичного управления фактически провалилась ещё до начала её полноценной реализации. Процесс добровольного объединения населённых пунктов проходит в условиях политического давления на органы местного самоуправления. Многочисленные примары и представители Конгресса местных вла…
👍12💯6❤2🤝2
DECLARAȚIA PLDM Cu privire la eșecul reformei APL PLDM atenționează că reforma administrației publice locale a eșuat înainte de a fi pusă în practică. Procesul de amalgamare voluntară se desfășoară într-un climat de presiune politică exercitat asupra autorităților locale de către guvernare. Numeroși primari și reprezentanți ai Congresului Autorităților Locale din Moldova (CALM) au semnalat existența unor presiuni ș…
👍12🔥4❤2💯2
ДЕКЛАРАЦИЯ ЛДПМ о продовольственной безопасности и будущем сельского хозяйства Республики Молдова Либерал Демократическая Партия Молдовы обращает внимание на беспрецедентный кризис в сельском хозяйстве Республики Молдова и призывает Правительство незамедлительно принять меры по защите фермеров и внутреннего аграрного рынка. Представительные организации сельхозпроизводителей подтверждают, что зерновой и масличный се…
👍15🔥4👌2
DECLARAȚIA PLDM privind securitatea alimentară și viitorul agriculturii moldovenești Partidul Liberal Democrat din Moldova atrage atenția asupra crizei fără precedent prin care trece agricultura Republicii Moldova și solicită Guvernului să intervină urgent pentru protejarea fermierilor și a pieței agricole interne. Organizațiile reprezentative ale agricultorilor confirmă că sectorul cerealier și oleaginos traversea…
👍16💯3👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @vladfilat1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 150,238 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vlad Filat” (@vladfilat1), 2,782 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladfilat1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.