Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for кирусик 🤍

Channel

кирусик 🤍

@timraleeva_kira

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

197,333subscribers

-1,161 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001564467887
TypeChannel
Username@timraleeva_kira
Description‼️Реклама/Сотрудничество- [email protected] @adrenalinPR Я В LIKEE: https://l.likee.video/p/a1E5wq
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/timraleeva_kira

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

197,333198,494197,913.57 August 2026 — 198,494 subscribers7 August 2026 — 198,494 subscribers7 August 2026 — 198,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 198,372 subscribers9 August 2026 — 198,220 subscribers10 August 2026 — 198,128 subscribers11 August 2026 — 197,987 subscribers12 August 2026 — 197,852 subscribers13 August 2026 — 197,688 subscribers14 August 2026 — 197,398 subscribers16 August 2026 — 197,333 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1,161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 197,159–198,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:12197,333-65
14 Aug 2026, 15:34197,398-290
13 Aug 2026, 06:56197,688-164
12 Aug 2026, 08:22197,852-135
11 Aug 2026, 11:03197,987-141
10 Aug 2026, 12:10198,128-92
9 Aug 2026, 14:21198,220-152
8 Aug 2026, 15:08198,372-121
7 Aug 2026, 13:57198,493-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:30198,494no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:21198,494first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.9%
avg views ÷ 197,333 subscribers
Avg views / post
68,900
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held27 (15 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total1,791,100
Reactions total103,324
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
65
Videos
8
Links
21

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

107,049 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79,90774.6%
🤔8,6618.09%
❤‍🔥4,8084.49%
💋3,5703.33%
💔2,9592.76%
💘2,8662.68%
🙊1,7931.67%
😍1,2721.19%
🔥1,2131.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107,049reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
398
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 27 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
68
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timraleeva_kira. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈23,400 views2,541 reactions35 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Кира Тимралеева - «Глаза» ✨НА ВСЕХ МУЗЫКАЛЬНЫХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ💥 слушайте все трек, буду очень вам благодарна если поддержите лайком и отправите всем всем своим друзьям 🥺🥺🥺 СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ

2,090💘172❤‍🔥130💋61😍31🔥18🙊15💔13

13 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC≈22,400 views1,590 reactions6 Starsread 16 August 2026

уже через 5 минуток мой трек выходит,ГОТОВЫ?💔🫣

1,270❤‍🔥121💋92😍39💘20🙊16🔥12💔11

12 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC≈32,100 views4,319 reactions8 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

пупс улетает наконец-то😊😊😊😊😊

3,550💘301❤‍🔥240💋62🤔60😍39🙊27🔥25

11 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈38,100 views3,484 reactions9 Starsread 16 August 2026

кукинг как обещала с Сеней в тик токе через 20 минуток🫣

2,870🔥248😍154💋56❤‍🔥43💘38💔33🤔22

10 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC≈45,400 views6,173 reactions16 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

💔🕷️🕸️

4,970💋475❤‍🔥362😍105💘72🙊63💔50🔥46

9 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈52,700 views5,265 reactions43 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Я долго не хотела это показывать… Но, думаю, после этой переписки у вас вопросов станет намного меньше. Дальше решайте сами.

3,560💔889🤔416🙊256💋35💘35❤‍🔥31🔥30

8 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈48,100 views2,478 reactions9 Starsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1,950❤‍🔥206🤔107💋73💘37💔31🙊29😍25

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈55,400 views2,009 reactions19 Starsread 16 August 2026

ну что ж… несмотря ни на что, я всё-таки решила это сделать. СНИППЕТ МОЕГО НОВОГО ТРЕКА «ГЛАЗА» уже в сети. 🖤👇🏼 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4V84VPY/ Думаю, после всего, что было, многие поймут этот трек совсем по-другому… Очень жду ваши первые впечатления и ваши видео под этот звук. Отмечайте меня — самые любимые обязательно замечу. 🫶 📱 СНИМАТЬ В LIKEE 📱 СНИМАТЬ В TIK TOK

1,690❤‍🔥123💋81😍38🔥20💘19🙊18💔14

7 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈48,700 views2,684 reactions13 Starsread 16 August 2026

17:00..

2,050🤔371❤‍🔥115💋45🙊36💔20💘19😍16

6 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC≈74,700 views4,811 reactions68 Starsread 16 August 2026

ребят… Завтра должен был выйти сниппет моего нового фита. но за последние часы произошло кое-что, чего я вообще не ожидала. честно, я до сих пор в шоке. иногда люди показывают своё настоящее лицо в самый последний момент. сейчас я вообще не понимаю, выйдет ли завтра этот сниппет или нет. очень не хочу вас подводить, потому что сама безумно ждала этот релиз. но после всего, что произошло сегодня, мне нужно немн

3,490💔735💘194🤔110🙊110❤‍🔥66💋62🔥28

4 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈78,200 views2,174 reactions7 Starsread 16 August 2026

ЗАКАЗАТЬ КОСТЮМ😍😍👇 https://kt-brand.ru

1,770❤‍🔥140🔥75💋56😍48🙊32💘23💔16

4 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈74,900 views2,795 reactions4 Starsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2,210💋247💘147❤‍🔥68😍40💔30🙊23🔥19

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @timraleeva_kira. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 4,052 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

кристюшкина😋
@mskaramelka01 · 309,122
#1
Мусим Ашуров
@musim_ashurov · 217,504
#2
AdrenalinHouse
@dance_adrenalin · 331,116
#3
Соня Сафарова
@sonya_safarova · 189,286
#4
НИКИТА ШУЛЬГИН
@shulginchik_nik · 308,352
#5
ТЁМА ТУЛЕНОВ
@tulenov_tema · 147,105
#6
SAINTY
@saintymusic · 6,690
#7
Viki Show
@vikishow_official · 261,717
#8
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 229,710
#9
ДЕРКУС
@derkysss · 30,802
#10
кружОК стешОК 🤍
@steshoklol · 116,273
#11
КАТЯ ДИМА
@katyashkuro · 166,191
#12
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 259,503
#13
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 606,104
#14
ЦУ Е ФА
@MILAZENIADAVIDSIMKA · 62,458
#15
Милана Хаметова
@MILASHKINATELEGKA · 214,197
#16
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 191,955
#17
Гаврилина зе бест :3
@Gavril1nna · 143,815
#18
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 665,373
#19
mekhrona
@mekhrona_sharipova · 90,669
#20
🎀Karna.val🎀
@karnava1l · 291,267
#21
сааша тут ✌🏻
@saashapopovvv · 20,003
#22
таня на связи📞
@morlovvvvvaaa · 16,802
#23
Бадабумчик
@badabum4ikkk · 133,106
#24
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 767,421
#25
хей! это марьяна!
@marillokelhere · 285,673
#26
GB FAMILY
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 108,554
#27
MILANA STAR
@milana_offi · 124,811
#28
Tamik💖
@tamerchiklover · 18,134
#29
Аслан Шукаша👷🏻
@aslanshukasha · 301,063
#30
ОСКАРИДЗЕ
@oskaridzeb · 36,827
#31
Anka Peresild
@officialannaperesild · 187,924
#32
АКУЛИЧ
@akyulenokk · 257,934
#33
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 144,470
#34
жизнь анджилиши 🤙🏻
@andjilisha · 25,284
#35
АНЯ POKROV🥑
@pokrov90avocado · 260,900
#36
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 697,506
#37
Влад Бумага A4
@A4omg · 449,663
#38
Ваша Аля
@enikeeva_aliya1 · 244,127
#39
Глент 🚀
@vladglenttg · 587,661
#40
Зум
@zvezdach_zoom · 30,100
#41
Женат на Марине
@zhenatnamarine1234 · 227,224
#42
i.roblox.queen
@robloxqueen · 65,091
#43
Марьяна Ми
@maryanamiblog · 3,673
#44
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,057,996
#45
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 277,384
#46
Pandochka666 | Пандочка666
@PandochkaYTV · 51,309
#47
Эвик тут
@eviktut · 1,372
#48
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ОБОИ
@temki_zvezdys · 2,381,217
#49
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,662,714
#50
Камиллка
@kamilleroffical · 16,127
#51
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,180,580
#52

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Соня Сафарова
@sonya_safarova · 189,286
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 15 August 2026
ТЁМА ТУЛЕНОВ
@tulenov_tema · 147,105
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
СИМКАА
@simka_lee · 195,513
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
тг темы 🦋 android
@parnye_avy_dlyaa · 106,928
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кирусик 🤍” (@timraleeva_kira), 197,333 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timraleeva_kira.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.