Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бадабумчик

Channel

Бадабумчик

@badabum4ikkk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

132,936subscribers

-894 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744411015
TypeChannel
Username@badabum4ikkk
Created9 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/badabum4ikkk

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

132,936133,830133,3836 August 2026 — 133,830 subscribers6 August 2026 — 133,813 subscribers7 August 2026 — 133,723 subscribers9 August 2026 — 133,643 subscribers9 August 2026 — 133,574 subscribers10 August 2026 — 133,493 subscribers11 August 2026 — 133,396 subscribers12 August 2026 — 133,328 subscribers14 August 2026 — 133,226 subscribers15 August 2026 — 133,106 subscribers16 August 2026 — 132,936 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -894. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132,802–133,964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:47132,936-170
15 Aug 2026, 10:58133,106-120
14 Aug 2026, 00:53133,226-102
12 Aug 2026, 20:15133,328-68
11 Aug 2026, 20:42133,396-97
10 Aug 2026, 23:33133,493-81
9 Aug 2026, 22:13133,574-69
9 Aug 2026, 01:11133,643-80
7 Aug 2026, 23:42133,723-90
6 Aug 2026, 21:48133,813-17
6 Aug 2026, 19:46133,830first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 132,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,000
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (3 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total153,990
Reactions total3,315
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,278 reactions across 19 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,18841.5%
❤‍🔥1,16022.0%
🔥3346.33%
👍3015.70%
🤬2574.87%
🤣2164.09%
💘1893.58%
😭661.25%
🍌531.00%
🤓450.853%
🤩430.815%
🙉400.758%
😴370.701%
🙈300.568%
💊270.512%
🥴270.512%
🙏260.493%
😨240.455%
🎃210.398%
🗿210.398%
28 further kinds1733.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @badabum4ikkk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈6,690 views303 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

Я тут отдыхаю, а вы там как?

🔥18750❤‍🔥16😭13🤬9🫡8👌6🎃4

3 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈14,300 views282 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Video

ОХАЕШЕЧКИ, НОВЫЙ ТРЕК🔥 Газ снимать, буду всех репостить: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4fhs6Qu/

❤‍🔥158🤣3226🤬23🍌13👍9🌚8🙏5

3 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈11,900 views222 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

128❤‍🔥30🤣26🍌9🔥7🤬7👍4🗿4

27 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC≈16,300 views358 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Video

КЛИП СЮ Ю Ю ВЫШЕЛ🔥 p.s готовим уже новый трек для вас

💘156🤬64🤣4125🥴20😨13🍌10😭10

27 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC≈14,800 views203 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

СЕГОДНЯ в 15:00 по МСК ВЫЙДЕТ КЛИП на СЮ Ю Ю, ЖДЁМ?❤️

  1. Да, сю ю ю ю62%
  2. Нет44%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

140🤬21❤‍🔥10🙉9👍6😭4🐳3🕊3

25 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC≈14,300 views367 reactions4 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Мы сняли клип на СЮ Ю Ю, выпускаем?❤️

256🙈27🤬25😭16❤‍🔥11🫡9🍌8🥴7

22 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC≈15,100 views271 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

180👍36🤓17🤬8🔥7❤‍🔥5🏆5😍4

21 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC≈15,700 views326 reactionsread 16 August 2026

ВСЕМ СЮ Ю ЮЮЮ

232❤‍🔥24🤬21🔥11🙊9👻7🍌5🦄5

21 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC≈15,500 views212 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

СЮ Ю - Анджилиша, Бадабумчик ВЫШЕЛ на ПЛОЩАДКИ🔥 СЛУШАТЬ: https://band.link/SUUU Бегом все слушать, обязательно нажимайте «❤️» и ставьте на репит🎵

❤‍🔥13049🔥14🤬13🏆2🙏2👾1🙉1

19 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC≈14,700 views381 reactions3 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Кто смотрит финал ЧМ, за кого болеете?🇪🇸🇦🇷

❤‍🔥28050😴18🤬11💊5🤝5🎃3💘3

18 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC≈14,700 views390 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Как лето проходит?❤️

❤‍🔥23060🤬23👍20😴19😢16🔥11💋4

15 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈16,400 views168 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

107❤‍🔥15🤓9🔥8🤣8🗿7🙏6💋3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @badabum4ikkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTCAnonymous Poll1,180 voters approx.

СЕГОДНЯ в 15:00 по МСК ВЫЙДЕТ КЛИП на СЮ Ю Ю, ЖДЁМ?❤️

  1. Да, сю ю ю ю62%
  2. Нет44%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 197,912 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ОСКАРИДЗЕ
@oskaridzeb · 36,827
#1
i.roblox.queen
@robloxqueen · 65,091
#2
НИКИТА ШУЛЬГИН
@shulginchik_nik · 309,263
#3
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 697,506
#4
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ | ОБОИ ТГ
@temki_parnye · 972,891
#5
AKIM TRADE | BINARIUM
@akim_picasso · 861 (as read 13 August 2026)
#6
сааша тут ✌🏻
@saashapopovvv · 20,003
#7
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 259,503
#8
Глент 🚀
@vladglenttg · 587,661
#9
хей! это марьяна!
@marillokelhere · 285,673
#10
люблю
@love_thxs · 462,799
#11
EDISON FAMILY
@edisonfamilia · 791,278
#12
Влад Бумага A4
@A4omg · 449,517
#13
Аслан Шукаша👷🏻
@aslanshukasha · 301,063
#14
ЦУ Е ФА
@MILAZENIADAVIDSIMKA · 62,342
#15
Мусим Ашуров
@musim_ashurov · 217,504
#16
DOSHIK
@de1shik · 147,808
#17
жизнь анджилиши 🤙🏻
@andjilisha · 25,284
#18
AdrenalinHouse
@dance_adrenalin · 331,116
#19
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 506,032
#20
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,507,452
#21
Pandochka666 | Пандочка666
@PandochkaYTV · 51,309
#22
ЗОВУТ ДОМЕР
@DomerGrief · 693,741
#23
Милс Кел (Play)
@meels_kel · 329,536
#24
кружОК стешОК 🤍
@steshoklol · 116,273
#25
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,180,580
#26
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 144,470
#27
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ ТГ ОБОИ
@temki_zvezdys · 2,381,217
#28
Viki Show
@vikishow_official · 261,717
#29
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 665,373
#30
Москва Live
@msk_live · 1,821,142
#31
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 767,003
#32
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 191,882
#33
ZAVIDOVA
@zavidushkimoi · 161,671
#34
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 435,255
#35
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 229,710
#36
songs | парные авы | темы тг
@animewwp · 522,662
#37
Tamik💖
@tamerchiklover · 18,134
#38
Эвик тут
@eviktut · 1,372
#39
MILANA STAR
@milana_offi · 124,811
#40
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,201,690
#41
mekhrona
@mekhrona_sharipova · 90,669
#42
Сеога ✌️
@seregaa4 · 62,697
#43
Nepeta Страшилки на YouTube
@nepeta_youtube · 114,943
#44
Гаврилина зе бест :3
@Gavril1nna · 143,757
#45
BUM NEWS 🗞️
@bum_news · 3,940
#46
ГЛЕБАС
@glebaseey · 172,829
#47
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 606,104
#48
Милана Хаметова
@MILASHKINATELEGKA · 214,197
#49
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,662,714
#50
GB FAMILY
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 108,554
#51
Стикеры | Эмодзи
@stikery4 · 1,083,471
#52
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 925,106
#53
Мир Supercell
@mir_supercell · 2,600,053
#54
Anka Peresild
@officialannaperesild · 187,924
#55

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

НИКИТА ШУЛЬГИН
@shulginchik_nik · 309,263
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 13 August 2026
BATEK_OFFICIAL
@batek_official · 399,425
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 August 2026
хей! это марьяна!
@marillokelhere · 285,673
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 August 2026
ТикТак
@tictactg · 93,183
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
Мусим Ашуров
@musim_ashurov · 217,504
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 August 2026
Глент 🚀
@vladglenttg · 587,661
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 8 August 2026
Nepeta Страшилки на YouTube
@nepeta_youtube · 114,943
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
Соня Сафарова
@sonya_safarova · 189,431
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 15 August 2026
ЯЗЫЧКИ И ТЕМКИ | ЯЗЫКИ И ОБОИ
@zastavki9 · 350,762
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
Влад Бумага A4
@A4omg · 449,517
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
кирусик 🤍
@timraleeva_kira · 197,333
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 15 August 2026
AdrenalinHouse
@dance_adrenalin · 331,116
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 10 August 2026
DOSHIK
@de1shik · 147,808
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
кружОК стешОК 🤍
@steshoklol · 116,273
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
Стикеры | Telegram Stickers
@TgStickery · 274,588
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
ТЁМА ТУЛЕНОВ
@tulenov_tema · 147,105
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
тг темы 🦋 android
@parnye_avy_dlyaa · 106,928
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 August 2026
кристюшкина😋
@mskaramelka01 · 309,122
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 14 August 2026
ЯЗЫКИ И ТЕМЫ | ОБОИ ТГ
@temki_parnye · 972,891
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 August 2026
БИСКАС
@ttwicsur · 192,531
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
ЗОВУТ ДОМЕР
@DomerGrief · 693,741
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 August 2026
FIXEYE / ФИКСАЙ
@fixeeye · 333,233
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 10 August 2026
Аслан Шукаша👷🏻
@aslanshukasha · 301,063
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
ДРУЗЬЯ ЗЕНИ
@ZenyTG · 132,944
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бадабумчик” (@badabum4ikkk), 132,936 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/badabum4ikkk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.