Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

North Dakota Voter Integrity

@NDVoterIntegrity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001348535950
TypeChannel
Username@NDVoterIntegrity
DescriptionBy constitutional powers reserved by the People, We are rising up to get an audit of the 2020 election.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/NDVoterIntegrity

Growth

1007 August 2026 — 100 subscribers9 August 2026 — 100 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:45100no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:53100first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
142
Videos
45
Links
192

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
16m 17s
Average length
3m 15s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

13 Mar 2025, 01:46 UTC191 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://rumble.com/v6qjzie-how-other-countries-vote-with-no-electronics-at-all.html

12 Mar 2025, 18:58 UTC127 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @justthefactsmaam

Fingers crossed that the whole Summit Carbon Solutions project collapses: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/south-dakota-bans-use-eminent-domain-carbon-dioxide-pipelines-2025-03-06/

7 Mar 2025, 02:10 UTC110 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @justthefactsmaamPhoto

Nothing is secure. Certainly not elections...

2 Mar 2025, 03:14 UTC95 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @thepeoplesauditPhoto

Want to play DOGE in your state or county? DataRepublican's site is a good starting point. Go to the site and type your state's name in the filter box and then set the tax payer funded percentage to 50% to get started. And then don't spit your coffee all over your screen when you see how much of your hard-earned tax dollars goes to fund total bullshit in your state. Of course there are more parasitic organization

1 Mar 2025, 02:24 UTC68 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sdcanvasschannelVideo

Dr. Jerome Corsi, who works with Trump's legal team, said all 50 states voter rolls are corrupt beyond repair. Each state needs the voter rolls wiped and to start over. This information is being brought to President Trump, and Dr. Corsi suggests Trump can issue an executive order for national security reasons. Our research and reporting has shown the SD grown Total Vote system is where the "magic" happens in the clou

15 Jan 2025, 15:28 UTC104 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @thedelcopatriotVideo

Video, posted without a caption

4 Dec 2024, 00:48 UTC141 viewsread 9 August 2026

Lawsuit recognizes mail in votes as inherently fraudulent. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/attorney-peter-ticktin-says-substantial-evidence-of-fraud-warrants-nullifying-congressional-district-14-congressional-election-302319754.html

3 Dec 2024, 01:49 UTC120 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

North Dakota - there are hundreds of your names used by ActBlue too.

1 Dec 2024, 22:42 UTC94 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

The dEMS 50 State Strategy When dEMOCRATS say the silent part out loud: (Christina Greer@ 07:15) : "All States are Red States, .... the only question is do you have enough Blue Cities in those Red States every 4 years to flip them in a Presidential Race..." https://www.msnbc.com/11th-hour/watch/-we-need-to-figure-out-a-fifty-state-strategy-democrats-stage-midterms-comeback-225459269520

27 Nov 2024, 21:28 UTC70 viewsread 9 August 2026

Elections are fake. All of them. It is not possible to create legitimately elected officials in the system and the system itself is similarly illegitimate. None of these people are authorized in any way to rule you. https://t.me/LizHarrington76/6718

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NDVoterIntegrity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 883,212 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“North Dakota Voter Integrity” (@NDVoterIntegrity), 100 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NDVoterIntegrity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.