Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

US Election Integrity Plan

@useip

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

590subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001250076321
TypeChannel
Username@useip
DescriptionColorado-founded, grassroots effort to connect people working together to restore election integrity. Everything we do in Colorado is being templated for use in other states. Visit useip.org and click “Get Involved” to join the fight!
Created14 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/useip

Growth

5907 Aug 2026, 01:20 — 590 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:31 — 590 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:207 Aug 2026, 01:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 589–591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:31590no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:20590first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
442
Videos
198
Links
1,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1932.2%
🔥1322.0%
🤔813.6%
610.2%
🤯58.47%
😁46.78%
😱35.08%
👎11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2023 to 20 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Mar 2024, 02:18 UTC951 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.colorado.edu/center/benson/konstantin-kisin

👍51

30 Aug 2023, 04:59 UTC≈1,510 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @KanekoaTheGreatVideo

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) in 2004: "If someone were deliberately hacking these machines, you could steal millions of votes, and no one would know it... We've documented a machine in this county that recorded 11,000 extra votes for Bush... These machines are hackable. A dishonest employee... or a dishonest employee of a local board of elections, or simply someone who knows electronics... could hack into these machin

👍8

28 Aug 2023, 03:23 UTC≈1,030 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectionEducationPhoto

Everyone needs to be aware of how to respond to election malfunctions and interference. If something is preventing you from submitting a ballot, you must hold your ground. If the elections office is not able to process ballots, you need to find out why. Make sure you have an emergency plan, and make sure everyone knows what to do in the event of an election emergency. We are the only ones willing to hold anyone a

👍1

15 Aug 2023, 02:46 UTC850 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/report-nationwide-cellular-network-connects-election-equipment-gives/

👍4

8 Aug 2023, 03:02 UTC728 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HOTWisconsin

Here's Why Legal Challenges to the 2020 Election Didn't Go Anywhere: We can’t have a plan for 2024 if we don’t first take an honest accounting of how our legal fight for election integrity was thwarted in 2020. When the subject of legal challenges to election fraud or irregularities in 2020 comes up, Lefties love to sneer, “Oh, you guys didn’t win a single case.” In the most technical sense, they have a point, but

6 Aug 2023, 01:17 UTC522 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thepeoplesauditVideo

DeSantis says Florida is the "Gold Standard of Elections" We have the data. All we need is time and a bigger server and we could load the voter rolls back to 2016 and see every phantom that was injected into the Florida Voter Rolls. I would love to track what happened to those over 100k people that got squeezed on the voter rolls in a single week in October so they could vote by mail in 2020. Nearly 60k were regist

6 Aug 2023, 01:16 UTC347 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thepeoplesauditVideo

We have been showing our data to the SOEs around the state...and let's just say they were never expecting to be monitored at a such a level. In one meeting, after being told that the county never delete recent voters, I slid over the over 200 voters that were in fact deleted only a few weeks of voting in the November 2022 election. It may not feel like it on the surface, but the patriots all across Florida are maki

🔥41

6 Aug 2023, 01:15 UTC296 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectionHQ2024

Imagine being so conservative that you have known men in government have been corrupt since people first stacked rocks or piled up timber, and you know every inclination of the government is to manifest ways to stay in power indefinitely - put you can’t get it past your thick skull that such men would figure out a way to warp the system of electing government to ensure their own rule.

2 Aug 2023, 01:47 UTC417 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://amgreatness.com/2023/08/01/poll-most-americans-support-election-integrity-policies/

28 Jul 2023, 03:12 UTC479 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Jack_Posobiec

Every voter in Nassau County, NY listed as ‘Democrat’ after printing ‘error’ https://thepostmillennial.com/every-voter-in-nassau-county-ny-listed-as-democrat-after-printing-error?utm_campaign=64483

😁4😱3

27 Jul 2023, 03:56 UTC357 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElectionEducationPhoto

This graph shows how many ballots were returned through the mail each day leading up to the 2020 election in blue lines, and the orange are the ballots returned through the drop boxes. Check this one out from Spokane County, WA in 2020. This is what I was talking about in the Ballot chain of custody tutorial. The next thing I will do is check the drop box logs and the USPS to county transfer logs to make sure the

🔥5

27 Jul 2023, 03:25 UTC344 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gatewaypunditofficial

Lawfare: The Legal Precedent Behind the “Alternate Electors” in Several Swing States, as Indictments Linger https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/lawfare-legal-precedent-behind-alternate-electors-several-swing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lawfare-legal-precedent-behind-alternate-electors-several-swing Follow @gatewaypunditofficial

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @useip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,120,275 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“US Election Integrity Plan” (@useip), 590 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/useip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.