Channel
@theborismorozov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
411subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001306425696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theborismorozov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theborismorozov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 411 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:40 | 409 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 409 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 October 2024 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,947 |
| Reactions total | 179 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
433 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 121 | 27.9% | |
| 👍 | 110 | 25.4% | |
| ❤ | 104 | 24.0% | |
| 🤡 | 48 | 11.1% | |
| ⚡ | 28 | 6.47% | |
| 🌚 | 11 | 2.54% | |
| 🗿 | 10 | 2.31% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.231% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 433reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему прибыль ≠ плата за риск? Каждый марксист в очередном споре о сущности экономической эксплуатации при капитализме рано или поздно сталкивается с аргументом вроде: «Но предприниматель же рискует, организуя производство, вступая на рынок, поэтому его прибыль – это справедливая плата за такой риск!». Знаете, на такой тезис сложно ответить иначе, кроме как тем, который использовался неким Михаилом Утопианом в да…
👍11🔥5⚡4❤1🤡1
«Студенты победят!» Или нет? Многие наверняка слышали о прошлогодних студенческих протестах в Сербии, связанных с трагедией на железнодорожном вокзале культурной столицы страны – Нови Сада. Об этом еще писали мои хорошие друзья из САФ, опубликовав письмо местного Студенческого фронта. Ознакомиться можете здесь. Но вот чего вы могли не знать: протесты не закончились, они продолжаются до сих пор, просто в разных город…
🔥12👍6❤3🌚1
Никогда не понимал творческих людей Не всех, конечно, но поведение большинства представителей творческой сферы мне непонятно. И это при том, что сам занимаюсь созданием контента, а это по идее один из видов творческой деятельности. Что мне не нравится в творческих людях, так это их эгоцентризм. Многие представители творческих профессий считают, что в силу выдающегося развития их правого полушария они могут себе поз…
❤8🔥8⚡4🤡2🗿1
Какой позиции придерживаетесь касательно выборов в Думу?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7🔥4⚡2
Современные «марксисты», по-видимому, вообще не умеют в анализ Притом ни в исторический, ни в социально-экономический. Яркий пример – прямо перед вами: некто Александр Коряковцев, доцент из УрГПУ, основатель очередной «школы марксизма» (на этот раз, на Урале) решил высказаться. Если конкретнее, то отметить, как все остальные, кроме него, плохо знают положения теории империализма. Начну разбирать сразу, цитировать …
🔥17❤4🌚4🤡3👎1
А вообще как у всех дела, соскучились?) P.S: Думаю, кстати, объявить отмену по прекращению работы на остальных площадках. А то замедляют сейчас абсолютно все, непонятно, где работать нельзя будет уже завтра… Поэтому будем работать даже там, где замедляют 😎
🔥24❤8🌚3🗿1
По приезде в Сербию обнаружил для себя крайне интересную картину. На одном из баннеров, приветствующих туристов или просто посетителей Белграда, внизу находится один известный любому российскому гражданину логотип – Газпром. Несколько заправок Газпромнефти по пути также не мог не заметить. Как и Лукойла, кстати. И ценам на бензин в сравнении мог бы позавидовать любой российский гражданин, особенно в текущих условиях…
⚡12🔥12❤10
https://youtu.be/qaHbJX-oDzU?si=9ml-CjkLvKvnRcTT Я опять не успел ко всем памятным датам. Однако, всех прошу к столу. Приятного.
👍25❤6🔥5🗿1
К слову, за обращение внимания на такие тезисы спасибо ФЛК. Несмотря на то, что ребята оттуда не особо хорошо ко мне относятся, как я понял (это НЕ взаимно, кстати), один из немногих левых мемных телеграмм-каналов, которые я сейчас читаю. Позицию по левым срачам, по которой мы вроде как с некоторыми админами оттуда расходимся, выскажу чуть позже, тоже считаю важным.
👍17🔥3❤2
Знаете, иногда просто страшно высказывать какие-либо новые, оригинальные для левоориентированного читателя/слушателя мысли. И не потому, что просто боишься осуждения со стороны тех, кто не вполне что-то понял, или просто не уверен в достоверности высказываемого (хотя и такое тоже бывает). А просто потому, что не знаешь, когда ты станешь очередным поехавшим Борисом в левом движении наподобие, например, этому персонажу…
👍22❤10🔥7⚡1🗿1🤡1
Всем привет! Пока ждем набора достаточного количества аудитории в данный канал, хочу порекомендовать еще один крайне интересный проект, который был запущен совсем недавно. Ребята находят разные интересные факты в области юриспруденции и раскрывают их с юмором. Мне также сказали, что, возможно, будет много всего интересного из отрасли трудового права, поэтому даже нам, идеологически ориентированным читателям, должно…
❤12👍9🔥4
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @theborismorozov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой позиции придерживаетесь касательно выборов в Думу?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 141,227 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Борис Морозов” (@theborismorozov), 411 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theborismorozov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.