Channel
@saf_union
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
9,235subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001985288449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saf_union |
| Description | https://t.me/saf_union/1082 — вступить и связаться по ссылке [email protected] — официальная почта для связи https://www.youtube.com/@suf_union/featured — ютуб-канал https://vk.com/saf_union — группа Вконтакте |
| Created | 13 April 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saf_union |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 9,235 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 9,243 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 9,244 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 9,245 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 9,245 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 39,070 |
| Reactions total | 1,177 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,177 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 341 | 29.0% | |
| 🔥 | 236 | 20.1% | |
| custom 5362053342325385009 | 167 | 14.2% | |
| 👍 | 146 | 12.4% | |
| 🤬 | 125 | 10.6% | |
| 🤣 | 104 | 8.84% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 1.87% | |
| 😢 | 19 | 1.61% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 0.51% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.51% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.34% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.085% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✏️Разные условия, общие устремления 12 августа отмечается Международный день молодёжи — наш с вами день, отмечающий ценность молодёжи как главного проводника социальных преобразований, экономического и технического развития. Молодые люди, живущие в разных странах, зачастую сталкиваются с одинаковыми проблемами в образовании, трудовой сфере, экологии — и решают их путём солидарности, объединения и участия в обществе…
❤24🔥9👍6
📢 Зовём всех на наш волгоградский субботник! Летние сессии давно позади, скоро начало нового учебного года — наступает лучшее время для добрых совместных дел. Субботник — проверенный способ провести время с пользой. Мы не раз видели: простая работа руками объединяет людей крепче, чем долгие разговоры. Приходите наводить порядок вместе. Инвентарь и хорошее настроение обеспечим. Сделаем общее пространство чище и встре…
🔥22custom 53620533423253850099👍6🤣4❤3😢1
Второй пикет в поддержку налога на роскошь в столице Удмуртии ❌ Сегодня на центральной площади Ижевска проходил одиночный пикет с требованием обложения налогами сверхбогатых вместо простых россиян. Людей было много, более 10 человек подошли к пикетеру, чтобы поблагодарить за смелость. 💢 Пять лет назад Ижевск был городом с самыми частыми одиночными и массовыми пикетами в России, они проходили буквально каждый месяц,…
🔥42❤13custom 53620533423253850096👍4⚡2
Встреча с кандидатом в Государственную Думу о проблемах жилья и молодежи 📍 Москва, ул. Черняховского, 17к1, м. Аэропорт 📅 16 августа в 13:00 состоится уличная встреча с кандидатом в депутаты Государственной Думы Матвеем Зотовым, посвящённая жилищной политике. Поговорим о доступности жилья и мерах, которые помогут изменить ситуацию, в том числе об инициативе «Налог на роскошь — жильё молодым!». Место встречи указано …
❤25🔥15⚡10custom 53620533423253850094
«Студенты победят!» Или нет? Многие наверняка слышали о прошлогодних студенческих протестах в Сербии, связанных с трагедией на железнодорожном вокзале культурной столицы страны – Нови Сада. Об этом еще писали мои хорошие друзья из САФ, опубликовав письмо местного Студенческого фронта. Ознакомиться можете здесь. Но вот чего вы могли не знать: протесты не закончились, они продолжаются до сих пор, просто в разных город…
❤34🔥12⚡7🤔2🤣1
В столице Удмуртии прошел первый одиночный пикет за несколько лет 🧑🧑🧒 Активистка из Ижевска задала вопрос: почему олигархи стали богаче, а мы беднее? Люди реагировали по-разному: кто-то смутился, так как никогда не видел уличных протестов, но, большинство были солидарны, фотографировали и поддерживали! 💢 Как вы уже поняли — это агитация от наших штабов за налог на роскошь ради жилья молодым, которые работают в 10…
❤54👍21🔥15custom 53620533423253850091
БЛИЖАЙШИЕ ВСТРЕЧИ ГОРОДСКИХ ШТАБОВ 💯 Кампания «Налог на роскошь — жилье молодым!» прямо сейчас развивается в 10 регионах России. На встречах обсудим, как проводить уличные опросы, собирать подписи, распространять агитационные материалы и добиваться поддержки нашего законопроекта. 📍 Магнитогорск 9 августа, воскресенье, в 16:00 Горком КПРФ — ул. Калмыкова, д. 8/3. 📍 Казань Встреча пройдёт онлайн в Zoom в воскресенье …
❤8🔥5👍2
❗Израильские силовики арестовали учёного в аэропорту Тель-Авива Артём Кирпичёнок — известный историк и журналист, окончивший Еврейский университет в Иерусалиме, имеет гражданство России и Израиля. В своих многочисленных статьях и выступлениях (например, в мае) он критиковал агрессивную фашистскую политику Израиля. 2 августа он прилетел в Тель-Авив для поездки на мероприятие, однако после прохождения пограничного ко…
🤬113❤33😢18⚡3🤣3😁3
🛠 Предзаказ новой книги - «Проект Ревизия. Том I. Метод» Почему привычные политические и экономические теории всё чаще перестают объяснять происходящее вокруг? Что изменилось в устройстве капитализма XXI века, и почему старые ответы больше не работают? «Проект Ревизия. Том I. Метод» — это попытка создать современную систему анализа общества, объединив идеи классического марксизма, достижения современной науки и исс…
❤30🤣22custom 536205334232538500914🤬12👍2🔥2🗿2☃1
Posted without readable text
❤10👍7custom 53620533423253850097🔥5🤣5🤔4🗿3
Олег Комолов о налоге на роскошь 🎙️ Благодарим экономиста Олега Комолова за участие в эфире, конструктивную критику нашей инициативы и её позитивную оценку. Отдельно ценим, что Олег поддержал идею налога на роскошь ещё на старте кампании. 🌇 Мы согласны: одного налога недостаточно — необходим целый комплекс мер по перераспределению ресурсов от сверхбогатых к большинству. Поэтому предлагаем Олегу совместно разработат…
👍39🔥10custom 536205334232538500910❤9
БОЛЬШОЙ ЭФИР — УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ В 20:00 🔈 На «Рабкоре» Олег Комолов и Дмитрий Морозов обсудят налог на роскошь, недоступность жилья для молодых и дальнейшие шаги нашей кампании. 🧭 Сегодня, 27 июля, в 20:00 по Москве 🔁 Подключайтесь к эфиру по ссылке. Задавайте вопросы и поддерживайте кампанию! #НалогНаРоскошь
👍18custom 536205334232538500916❤7🔥7🤣7🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @saf_union. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 6,862 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Student Anti-Fascist Front |
|---|---|
| Description | Left-wing student organisation in Russia |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“САФ | Студенческий Антифашистский Фронт” (@saf_union), 9,235 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saf_union.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.