Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Держать Курс

Channel

Держать Курс

@keepkurs1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,589subscribers

-88 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001445535887
TypeChannel
Username@keepkurs1
DescriptionБусти https://boosty.to/keepkurs
Created17 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/keepkurs1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,5899,6789,633.56 August 2026 — 9,677 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,677 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,678 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,674 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,668 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,663 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,660 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,658 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,649 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,642 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,635 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,639 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,627 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,630 subscribers4 October 2026 — 9,625 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,635 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,627 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,622 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,627 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,619 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,621 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,608 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,599 subscribers10 November 2026 — 9,589 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 96 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,576–9,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:099,589-10
4 Nov 2026, 12:389,599-9
1 Nov 2026, 09:059,608-13
29 Oct 2026, 10:089,621+2
26 Oct 2026, 13:469,619-8
20 Oct 2026, 15:469,627+5
17 Oct 2026, 16:589,622-5
15 Oct 2026, 02:549,627-8
11 Oct 2026, 14:419,635+10
4 Oct 2026, 19:419,625-5
25 Sept 2026, 14:389,630+3
17 Sept 2026, 06:209,627-12
13 Sept 2026, 04:369,639+4
9 Sept 2026, 00:589,635-7
3 Sept 2026, 18:579,642-7
31 Aug 2026, 02:129,649-9
27 Aug 2026, 20:199,658-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:079,660-3
22 Aug 2026, 10:359,663-5
18 Aug 2026, 22:169,668first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.4%
avg views ÷ 9,589 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,870
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held33 (27 May 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total30,980
Reactions total451
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈406
Links
≈1,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,886 reactions across 33 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,886100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,886 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (75.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,820 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Япония вообще интересный исторический случай, который левые предпочитают не видеть. Представьте, страна сталкивается с набирающим обороты империализмом. В середине XIX века приезжают ребята с пушками и заставляют заключать неравноправные договоры, фактически лишая Японию части её суверенитета. Это порождает в стране самое классическое НОД — старую власть свергнуть, поставить новую, начать модернизацию, освободиться…

👍48

30 Oct 2026, 17:30 UTC≈3,090 views58 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Еще немного про Японию, а точнее про крестьянство, и про то, откуда вообще берутся все эти беды, связанные с наступлением капитализма. Крестьяне на самом деле породили не только движение молодых офицеров в Японии, но и множество других радикальных движений по всему миру. Причина недовольства крестьян во многих странах была примерно одинаковой — разорение. Там, где начиналось быстрое развитие капиталистических отноше…

👍58

25 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈4,240 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Тоже подкину своих мыслей о крахе отечественного марксизма. Я, в общем-то, уже как-то писал, что в основе постсоветского коммунизма и марксизма лежит не низовое движение пролетариата, а национальный реваншизм и накопившиеся обиды. То, что в нулевые и десятые были какие-то новые волны интереса к левым идеям, не меняет того факта, что сам общественный интерес к левым был связан прежде всего с советской ностальгией. М…

👍38

23 Oct 2026, 16:55 UTC≈4,190 views52 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Всем кому интересно, сообщаю, что я-таки решил создать новый канал для видео на английском. По моим ощущениям примерно 60-70% отписавшихся предложили заливать видео на отдельный канал. Поэтому последнее видео про Японию я скрыл на основном канале и перезалил на новый. Более того, наконец-то заработал автоматический дубляж на русский. Так что даже те, кто не знают английского могут посмотреть с ИИ-переводом. https://…

👍52

23 Oct 2026, 11:45 UTC≈3,640 views35 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Касательно молодого офицерства в Японии я бы хотел добавить ещё кое-что. Согласно традиционному левому представлению, правые защищают интересы элит, а левые — соответственно, интересы народа. Марксисты, конечно, не совсем согласятся с такой формулировкой и заявят, что интересы народа защищают исключительно они, а все остальные либо враги (правые), либо предатели (другие левые). Я бы, правда, добавил к этому, что даже…

👍35

16 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC≈5,030 views54 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Коль уж мы вернулись к теме Японии, мне есть что сказать. В 1930-е годы Японию захлестнула волна политических покушений и убийств, кульминацией которой стало восстание 1936 года. Главными бунтарями всей этой движухи выступали молодые офицеры, как правило полевые командиры в звании лейтенантов и капитанов, не выше. Часто движение молодых офицеров в Японии сравнивают с фашистским движением, так как их идеология была с…

👍54

14 Oct 2026, 08:31 UTC≈4,220 views87 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Заметка для аудитории канала Держать Курс. Как многие заметили, я долго отсутствовал, не занимался каналом, жил своей жизнью. Недавно у меня появилось желание перевести несколько старых роликов на английский. Вчера я опубликовал перевод ролика про Японию. Однако я сделал ошибку, когда не сообщил вам об этом заранее. Многие ожидали, что после долгого перерыва они получат контент для себя, а не для кого-то другого. Эт…

👍87

13 Oct 2026, 16:49 UTC≈4,750 views79 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Первый дубляж на английский сделан. Основательно переработал и пересобрал первую часть про Японию. Перехожу к переводу на английский второй части. Сценарии при этом полностью перерабатываю согласно своим текущим представлениям о правильном. https://youtu.be/Ob2HsG4JJLY

👍79

13 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC≈7,450 views40 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Прокомментирую заметку моего хорошего друга про связь автоматизации, репрессий и максимизации прибыли между собой. Внимание — сложно для понимания. Автор статьи на мой взгляд весьма заблуждается, а статья его содержит логические противоречия. Изначально статья предполагает, что капиталистическая конкуренция ведет к автоматизации и стремлению к максимизации прибыли. Но затем автор переносит эту же логику на государ…

👍40

11 Sept 2026, 19:25 UTC≈6,230 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Размышление о безответственности — о том, что происходит, когда человек получает возможность рассуждать о политике и обществе, не принимая никаких реальных решений и не отвечая за последствия своих идей. Как безответственность порождает радикализм, идеологическое мышление, поиск врагов и политическую клоунаду — и почему ответственность за решения необходима для самого процесса мышления. Текст

👍44

4 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC≈7,730 views55 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Почему большевики вообще смогли взять власть в 1917 году и при чем здесь крестьянская мечта поделить помещичью землю? В этом выпуске я попробую посмотреть на Октябрьскую революцию прежде всего как на крестьянскую революцию — от черного передела и развала армии до продразверстки, коллективизации и индустриализации. А заодно поговорю о том, почему советский путь удалось пройти именно России и что происходило, когда его…

👍55

29 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈8,380 views54 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Еще раз решил запись для вас своего рода подкаст! Знаю, что тема уже не новая для читателей, но все же решил ее поднять вновь. Потом поговорю о чем-нибудь другом. Текст тут

👍54

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @keepkurs1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@keepkurs1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Думай сам/Думай сейчас.
@dumai_sam_i_sei4as · 29,850
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
АГИТПРОП
@Agitblog · 109,067
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Диалектик
@dialectic_club · 26,340
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
Простые числа
@primenumbers2021 · 68,623
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
РТФ. Российский Трудовой Фронт
@RotFront_su · 24,981
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
Politeconomics
@politeconomics · 20,981
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 September 2026
Рудой
@rud01vb · 18,936
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 October 2026
У Жукова
@uzhukova · 41,353
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Профсоюз работников IT
@ruitunion · 36,079
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Держать Курс” (@keepkurs1), 9,589 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keepkurs1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.