Для тех кто только присоединился, на платформе в подписке «Еда и напитки» собраны 32000 с лишним товаров: — Детское питание — Перекусы и сладости — больше 7 000 позиций — Бакалея — Замороженные продукты — Масла, уксусы и соусы — Напитки — Подарки и подарочные наборы — Консервация — Молочные продукты — Полуфабрикаты — Специи и многое другое И бонусом: — Памятка «Тарелка здорового питания» — Чек-лист «Как отучить реб…

Channel
НЕСЮ НЕСЁТ | ЭКОРАЗНОС
@the_nesya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,778subscribers
-411 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001127481227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_nesya |
| Description | Канал для осознанных родителей и потребителей. 💚 Экоразнос® — это место, где выбирают проще, живут спокойнее и перестают делать покупки “наугад”. ecoraznos.ru — платформа безопасного выбора для семьи №7772673319 the_nesya Инесса Генералова |
| Created | 8 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_nesya |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 40,778 | -27 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 40,805 | -19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 40,824 | -17 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 40,841 | -28 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 40,869 | -40 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 40,909 | -37 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 40,946 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:53 | 40,945 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:24 | 40,960 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 40,965 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 40,978 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 40,988 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 40,993 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 40,984 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 41,001 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 41,011 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 41,021 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 41,039 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 41,058 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 41,070 | first reading |
Engagement
222 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.73%
- avg views ÷ 40,778 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,930
- 109 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.23%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 109
- of 222 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 105 of 109 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 222 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 210,374 |
| Reactions total | 2,500 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 00:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,590
- Videos
- ≈1,810
- Links
- ≈4,210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 14s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,448 reactions across 217 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,764 | 62.1% | |
| 🔥 | 682 | 15.3% | |
| 👍 | 424 | 9.53% | |
| 🥰 | 150 | 3.37% | |
| 😁 | 132 | 2.97% | |
| 💯 | 99 | 2.23% | |
| 🎉 | 36 | 0.809% | |
| 🤣 | 32 | 0.719% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 0.427% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 0.405% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 0.382% | |
| 🙈 | 16 | 0.36% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 0.292% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 0.112% | |
| 😐 | 5 | 0.112% | |
| 🤨 | 5 | 0.112% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 0.09% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.09% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.09% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.09% | |
| 10 further kinds | 15 | 0.337% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 217 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,448 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 222 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @the_nesya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 222 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Но давайте осудим и другие грани ПЭПЭ. Грани разумного. Вы отказываетесь от ЗОЖ потому, что не в силах жить без колбасы и шпрот? Или отказываетесь от протеста и колбасы? А вот и не нужно этого делать. Нужно просто покупать безопасные, по нашей подписке с базой продуктов и напитков. Вот серьезно! Я ж ее не только для вас придумала, но и для себя и своих близких. Просто потому, что мой папа любит майонез, Федя доктор…
❤12
Ну вот, например, такая каша вообще не про здоровый завтрак. И категорически не подходит тем, кто следит за фигурой. ❌Сахар — мгновенный скачок глюкозы, за которым следует резкий упадок сил уже к середине утра. ❌Ароматизаторы — обманывают рецепторы вместо настоящего вкуса. Хотели быстрого и полезного завтрака — получили миску сахара с отдушкой. Выбирайте крупу долгой варки и настоящие ягоды🍓🫐🍒 〰📱 ВК 〰📲 Max 〰
❤🔥7❤1
Хочу поговорить с вами про НЕ полезный завтрак. С детства мы привыкли, что нужно обязательно есть каши — это залог здоровья и иммунитета… Кто так делает до сих пор? Кто приучил к этому детей? Вся моя семья ест каши каждое утро, мой жених и Вика без них наверное не смогут начать день (я даже боюсь экспериментировать), а вот я переелс их в детстве, навсегда🤭. Но реальность с пользой каш совсем иная! Сейчас будет шо…
👍13❤6
С чего началось ваше доброе утро сегодня? И восколько оно началось?) 〰📱 ВК 〰📲 Max 〰
❤11
🧴 Худшие влажные салфетки для детей: Мы уже привыкли, что взрослые влажные салфетки — это коктейль из агрессивных ПАВ, спиртов и ароматизаторов. Но, казалось бы, детские должны быть идеальными. Увы, просто взглянув на состав мы видим обратное. ❌Huggies Elite Soft - раздражение кожи и усиление чувствительности ❌Yokosun - аллергический дерматит, нарушение микробиома кожи ❌Aura Ultra Comfort - раздражения, гормональ…
👍7😱5❤2
Проверяйте почту. Серьёзно. Не только папку «Входящие», но и «Спам» заодно. Все, кто оформлял подписки… Потому что именно туда мы отправляем индивидуальные промокоды на дополнительные плюшки и бонусы от проекта. Это ваш личный сюрприз. И он может быть очень и очень приятным. Так что загляните в почту. Возможно, вас там уже ждёт кое-что. 💚 А если ничего нет, напишите, пришлем еще разок! А если что-то непонятно — пр…
❤9👍3
Отвечаю на самый частый вопрос: «А если у меня уже есть подписка?» Всё суммируется, складывается и приплюсовывается. Спокойно. Если у вас уже есть подписка до какого-то периода — она просто продлится. Вы покупаете комбо или другой тариф в дни приятных цен, и ваш срок складывается с новым. Всё ваше остаётся вашим. Ссылка на акцию 👇🏻 👉🏻 https://ecoraznos.ru/sale/ 〰📱 ВК 〰📲 Max 〰
🔥7❤3
Доброе утро! (сегодня проснулись попозже, нам же не в школу 🫢) За последний год я совсем изменилась, мягкая стала, домашняя. Помню период, когда даже пустая сковородка на плите вызывала раздражение. А сейчас я просто хозяюшка с сырничками на завтрак, свежими, только из духовки. Интересно это связано с моими изменениями в личной жизн? Или это общий фон и запрос на домашнее тепло в условиях нестабильного мира? 〰📱 В…
❤37🔥4🥰1
Posted without readable text
❤10
Что у нас придумано интересненького для этой акции? Бонусы: 🎁 При оформлении подписки «Косметика и бытовая химия»— 5% на новый курс «Сам себе косметолог» и купон 1 000 ₽ на «Особый уход». 🎁 При оформлении баз с едой или витаминов — купон 1 500 ₽ на «Сам себе нутрициолог». Ссылка на акцию 👇🏻 👉🏻 https://ecoraznos.ru/sale/ Просто оформляйте, наслаждайтесь и будьте здоровы. 💚 〰📱 ВК 〰📲 Max 〰
Роспотребнадзор выявил серьезные несоответствия в составе популярных детских смесей «NESTOGEN 1» и «NESTOGEN 2» от производителя «Нестле Россия». Согласно результатам проверки, фактическое содержание ряда критически важных нутриентов оказалось значительно ниже заявленного на упаковке: витамина А — почти в 4 раза меньше нормы, витамина Е — в 2 раза, а также зафиксировано сильное занижение уровня йода. При этом концен…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @the_nesya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@the_nesya edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 25 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iv_novikov29 · 6,637#1
@emets_ea · 549#2
@garikovainsight · 23,823#3
@naturebeauty_bogdanova · 641#4
@doctor_annamama · 82,960#5
@mikeryna_sashaa · 189,517#6
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390#7
@vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 265,719#8
@bezuderjnoe_veselie · 33,700#9
@larangsovetme · 112,374#10
@Pokypaem_s_ymomSS · 25,484#11
@ksenia_finance · 76,055#12
@mama_bond007 · 96,852#13
@eco_system_vo · 5,683#14
@pptonya · 113,301#15
@vpokoe · 71,348#16
@olechkindurdom · 52,001#17
@dvoe_v_zhivote · 34,582#18
@rudnev_eco · 465#19
@nastia_tasty · 31,289#20
@hochuibydy · 11,140#21
@magerya · 288,728#22
@drabakumof · 146,408#23
@anna_akininaa · 161,202#24
@mama_mi_shonka · 24,633#25
@yunatspervie41 · 279#26
@chusovskoy · 844#27
@vstre4isosmislom · 1,044#28
@stilderella · 584#29
@karneevaElena · 45,810#30
@natasha_ffb_tyt · 39,526#31
@vasilkova_maria · 96,076#32
@irina_gavrilova_neigrushki · 12,313#33
@ollyrussia · 12,024#34
@ekotest · 14,156#35
@mamalino_mam · 6,385#36
@pereverzeva_live · 47,137#37
@urist_business · 1,774#38
@thefield_of_one · 19,699#39
@ella_go22 · 2,561#40
@moi_mirt · 505#41
@uletimru · 41,798#42
@detsdoc · 59,048#43
@nastyamizgir · 7,602#44
@anastavanga · 47,461#45
@mixaatomov · 1,608#46
@ivfmom · 2,379#47
@chaadaevamaria · 43,672#48
@marinka_kvadromama · 44,924#49
@ma_linochkaa · 22,189#50
@kudri_v_oblaka · 27,267#51
@mom_pati · 5,260#52
@UF_jirojable · 5,365#53
@polosinaks_new · 12,033#54
@mama_sinka · 40,842#55
@profinansy · 576,732#56
@amelyrain · 32,617#57
@valentinapaevskaya · 230,771#58
@hidden_upd_gc · 1,507#59
@olgaavet · 4,180#60
@gazarovalexandr · 18,695#61
@ya_glyva · 20,654#62
@shamilahmadullin · 179,006#63
@olly_team_psy · 6,541#64
@get_useful · 1,990#65
@svetlana_nechego_nadet · 12,465#66
@free4kids_official · 27,672#67
@lanaoky_znaet · 20,404#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@istinaglagolova · 41,777
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
@potreb_solntseva · 57,059
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@bezuderjnoe_veselie · 33,700
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
@natasha_ffb_tyt · 39,526
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
@panochka_yanochkatut · 36,973
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 1 September 2026
@raisa_alibekova · 74,140
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
@anastavanga · 47,461
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
@pp_foodpro_tg · 35,291
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
@nastia_tasty · 31,289
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
@amelyrain · 32,617
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕСЮ НЕСЁТ | ЭКОРАЗНОС” (@the_nesya), 40,778 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_nesya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.