Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 92 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,570–24,692 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 12:11
24,640
-5
6 Nov 2026, 14:54
24,645
+4
5 Nov 2026, 17:35
24,641
-6
4 Nov 2026, 20:26
24,647
-13
3 Nov 2026, 17:38
24,660
+7
2 Nov 2026, 14:16
24,653
+17
1 Nov 2026, 14:12
24,636
+38
31 Oct 2026, 12:48
24,598
-10
30 Oct 2026, 09:45
24,608
-6
29 Oct 2026, 07:00
24,614
-3
28 Oct 2026, 05:06
24,617
-12
27 Oct 2026, 05:20
24,629
-3
26 Oct 2026, 04:39
24,632
-8
25 Oct 2026, 06:07
24,640
-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:31
24,646
-1
23 Oct 2026, 00:31
24,647
+1
22 Oct 2026, 02:07
24,646
-2
20 Oct 2026, 17:06
24,648
-3
19 Oct 2026, 19:07
24,651
-13
18 Oct 2026, 17:08
24,664
first reading
Engagement
178 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 24,640 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 178 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
178 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
275,972
Reactions total
10,335
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,140
Videos
≈2,350
Links
≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
34m 41s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27,229 reactions across 167 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14,085
51.7%
🔥
10,783
39.6%
😍
2,361
8.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 178 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.93%
7 of 178 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,130
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,740
over 160 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5xd8Lxi
2
31 October 2026
31 October 2026
2VSb5wLgVJr
1
26 October 2026
26 October 2026
2VSb5wN8oFx
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2VSb5wd21kW
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2VSb5yBUcw4
1
27 October 2026
27 October 2026
2W5zFKA9Mr9
1
15 August 2026
15 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 84 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Первый раз я пропила курс Vitabeauty гиалуроновая кислота+ресвератрол несколько лет назад перед одной из поездок в Таиланд (и, конечно, продолжала принимать во время пребывания там). Девочки, я была в шоке от того, как прекрасно на этот курс отреагировала кожа!
Я просто по умолчанию всегда была готова к тому, что после тёплых стран, после активной инсоляции, солёной воды, тонн средств с SPF, которые потом нужно тщат…
Подарите себе 75 минут интеллектуального удовольствия 🙌🏻
Разговор о чтении, НЕчтении, книгах, детях, уме, душе, воле, жизни, смерти, смехе, скуке наедине с самим собой, одиночестве и многом другом.
Спасибо алгоритмам ютуба за то, что посчитали меня целевой аудиторией этого прекрасного диалога!
Самое интересное интервью... ДЕЖУРОВ | КОПАНЦЕВ
P.S. После этого интервью в очередной раз похвалила себя за «Улисса»
В Петербурге просто чудом успела попасть на выставку Серов и Коровин в KGallery.
Толпы!
Пространство крошечное!
Посетители плечом к плечу!
Удовольствие НЕВЕРОЯТНОЕ!!!
Идти строго ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО!!! Соберусь с силами и непременно напишу подробный пост об этой выставке — недаром, несмотря на все экспозиционные нюансы, о ней трубят во все голоса!
Отдельное удовольствие — серия видов Парижа, написанных Коровиным в эмиграц…
Начала писать пост об этих книгах и не могу продвинуться дальше первой строчки потому что не знаю, как правильно классифицировать эти потрясающие новинки, которыми, не могу подобрать другого слова, балует нас издательство АСТ в лице редакции Аванта @astdeti
С одной стороны, эти книги, вне всяких сомнений — естественнонаучные энциклопедии, каждая из которых детально, подробно и всеобъемлюще рассказывает об одном из п…
✔️ Отрицание
✔️ Торг
✔️ Заказ аэрогриля
Я ооооочень долго убеждала себя, что мне не нужна никакая новая кухонная бытовая техника, потому что вся уже имеющаяся техника целиком и полностью закрывает все мои потребности.
Но после последнего мытья духовки я сдалась 🙌🏻
Девочки, буду очень признательна, если поделитесь своими лайфхаками по использованию аэрогриля, любимыми проверенными рецептами и посоветуете, с чего на…
Мне кажется, каникулы Саши я люблю даже больше, чем любит их Саша🤣
С учётом того, что в учебное время Саня обычно максимально загружена, именно на каникулах у нас есть время для всего того, до чего в обычные дни не доходят руки, а самое главное — у нас есть время на долгие разговоры по душам, на просмотр фильмов, на любимые долгие настолки, на чтение без чёткого тайминга, а у Саши наконец-то есть время на творчество!…
Трудно быть богом
Роман/повесть братьев Стругацких
Книга vs сериал
Книга давно была в моём списке #перечитать
Я уже признавалась к своей любви к Стругацким, писала, что для меня их творчество — настоящая машина времени!
И вот теперь ТББ ассоциируется у меня с ночным Питером — именно слушая эту книгу, я долго бродила по городу, а финалом заслушалась так, что заблудилась.
Если вы не читали произведение, кратко рас…
В продолжение начатой утром бьюти-темы: когда у тебя дочь-подросток, то не только твой гардероб и твоя косметика принадлежат не только тебе, но и бьюти-гаджетами тоже приходится делиться🙌🏻
Саша, безусловно, тоже опробовала мою новую LED-маску, авторитетно сообщила, что она значительно удобнее предыдущей модели (более эргономичная форма, беспроводное соединение с пультом управления) и теперь регулярно использует сини…
Как хорошо, когда у ребёнка каникулы — у меня всегда есть компания для всех интересных дел и занятий))))
Поговорим о косметологии?
Вы знаете, до недавнего времени я несколько скептически относилась ко всевозможным препаратам для мезотерапии. Вот биоревитализанты (то есть препараты для увлажнения кожи) — однозначно да, эффект виден сразу, особенно если делать инъекции в зоне шеи или тыльной поверхности кистей — эти з…
Мной написано невероятное количество постов с тегом #питер_mama_mishonka и самый лучший комплимент — это когда девочки-петербурженки пишут, что именно благодаря моим постам они находят идеи для досуга в своём родном городе.
Сказать, что это приятно — ничего не сказать!
Но есть одна тема, одна часть культурных объектов, которая мной практически не охвачена — это мемориальные квартиры знаменитых жителей города.
К сожа…
В первом классе, в неполные семь лет, на уроке танцев я узнала от учителя этих самых танцев, что у меня «танцевальный кретинизм». Я тогда не очень поняла, что это значит, и после уроков решила подойти и уточнить, что значит это непонятное слово. Тогда я узнала про себя, что я слон в посудной лавке, не могу запомнить простейшую танцевальную связку а-ля два притопа, три прихлопа, совершенно не попадаю в ритм и вообще я…
🔥231❤91😍16
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @mama_mi_shonka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @mama_mi_shonka as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
40 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Не стал(а) читать пост, тема мне не очень интересна9%
Чтобы определиться окончательно нужны ещё аргументы8%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Начал(а) читать, бросил(а), НЕ хочу возвращаться9%
Знаю об этом романе и поэтому даже не планирую его читать24%
Знаю об этом романе, планирую его читать16%
Ничего не знаю об этом романе40%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
UletimRU - о путешествиях и не только @uletimru · 41,472 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Ma_linochka @ma_linochkaa · 22,262 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 September 2026
Екатерина Шрейнер | SchreinerKate | Психолог @schreinerkate_life · 64,178 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Полина Мальцева @polina_education · 124,881 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Вшивая интеллигенция @vshivaya_intelligenciya · 51,802 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
Радио и Театр @oldradioteatr · 111,743 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
the_nesya резерв @the_nesya · 32 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
kattrin @kattrin_official · 27,551 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
❤️🔥istinaglagolova Life❤️🔥 @istinaglagolova · 41,247 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Ksenia_finance @ksenia_finance · 75,352 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Tobolator @tobolator · 50,428 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
vasilkova_maria @vasilkova_maria · 94,838 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 August 2026
Karneeva_elena @karneevaElena · 45,868 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
Lil.School — онлайн-школа рисования @lilschool · 19,171 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
Лариса Суркова - larangsovet @larangsovetme · 110,425 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
Melannett @melannettt · 106,686 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Юлия Егорушкина о психологии @nesovetchik · 80,865 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Голова в холоде [ ноги в тепле ] @polivaleriya · 19,356 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 October 2026
ARINA SHUMAKOVA @arina_travels · 87,448 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Эффект Бочковой @OlgaBochkovaAcademy · 19,284 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
doctor_annamama @doctor_annamama · 82,313 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
matolimp @matolimp · 31,902 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mama_mishonka 📚” (@mama_mi_shonka), 24,640 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mama_mi_shonka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.