Channel
@the_links_en
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001867229165 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_links_en |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_links_en |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 125 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 126 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 126 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 30 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 58.5% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 24.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 14.6% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @the_links_en. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2025 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Evolution of Tokens Previous part Pupupu, it's been almost a year since I wrote the previous article. On one hand, a lot has changed. On the other hand, almost nothing has. In this series, I talk about trends in tokens and launchpads on TON (GRAM). It feels like I could also start covering trading terminals now, because we finally have those too. Stonks launched its terminal, and DeDust released the x1000 termina…
👍2
I won the contest and finally received my prize. Enough for a burger — thanks! Fun fact: at one point, 50 $EVAA was worth $500. The Links
👍2
I played Durov’s casino and won Pretty clickbaity headline — I hope I managed to grab your attention. Now to the point. Since not all readers are up to speed on gifts, here’s a quick rundown of crafting. Today, Telegram introduced a feature that lets you, with a certain probability, “combine” several Desk Calendar or Jingle Bells gifts into one new gift. There’s a chance it won’t work and all the gifts used in craf…
❤2👍1
Today I joined a call with https://x.com/JamesWynnReal. Long story short, he’s a guy who likes trading with leverage positions about 100 $BTC. I asked him what he thinks about TON and Telegram, and I was pleasantly surprised to hear some positive notes in his answer. I decided to gift the good guy a Matrix button — it was cheaper than sending a message for 5,400⭐ 💡 Now I want to join other similar spaces, ask peop…
🔥4
By the way, here’s the Rich Cats NFT project from way back in 2022. It had a constructor where you could dress up a cat. The visuals were at a solid level, and overall the project looked promising, but at some point it was abandoned — the last post is dated February 2023. I don’t know many details. There were theories that Telegram implements the most successful mechanics, so now it’s just a matter of waiting for s…
👍2😁1
Gifts or stickers? What if in the end these turn out to be gifts, not the NFT stickers we were dreaming about back in spring? I suddenly remembered playing Diablo II after school — ah, those were the days. The current Gifts section kind of feels like an in-game inventory, just with infinite slots. I sketched out a concept of how we could dress up Durov. Almost all clothing items already exist, and as a weapon you …
👍2❤1
The Links pinned «❄️ Many people have already summed up the year, and I wanted to as well — but I won’t. I’ll leave only gratitude and wishes here. Thank you to everyone who reads The Links and still subscribed! Thanks for the comments and likes — it’s great to see that my…»
❄️ Many people have already summed up the year, and I wanted to as well — but I won’t. I’ll leave only gratitude and wishes here. Thank you to everyone who reads The Links and still subscribed! Thanks for the comments and likes — it’s great to see that my notes resonate with some of you, or that you’re willing to stand your ground in the comments. That’s important too! I wish you green candles, high-quality content…
❤2👍1
Another sticker launcher / sticker store A new app has recently appeared, where new sticker packs will be released. They’ve already got support from many major IPs. Meet the first launch on Goodies Today you can grab a sticker for just 1 TON, and the supply is limited — only 888 pieces, which is quite few. The stickers look great, but the most important thing is that they’ll have utilities: They will play a major…
👍2
X Competition: First to get a public reply from @s0meone_u_know, @mcrown or @ton_blockchain wins 10 30 TON. How to enter: 1. Use memes from the meme channel or create your own with Didi and be creative. 2. Any public reply that mentions Didi counts. 3. Post your reply link. 4. Help others by raiding - teamwork increases your chances. Rules: first valid public reply = winner. Proof in group chat required. Play f…
👍1
EVAA Launch Recap & First Unlocks The $Evaa token just had a smooth launch and listings on Binance Alpha, Binance Futures, Gateio, and MEXC. All listings went live exactly on schedule – flawless execution. 👏 About first unlocks. 👼 Angel Round At the very beginning, tokens were only in the hands of market makers and angel investors. - $120k raised at $0.20 per token - 5% unlocked at TGE, while the remaining 95% i…
👍1
https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/a77f1232bd7c446796d87a3047e71819
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @the_links_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Links” (@the_links_en), 125 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_links_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.