Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Good Vibes Club 🤙

@GoodVibesClub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,871subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002509855792
TypeChannel
Username@GoodVibesClub
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GoodVibesClub

Growth

1,8711,8791,8756 August 2026 — 1,879 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,879 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,878 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,872 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,871 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,870–1,880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:461,871-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:311,872-6
6 Aug 2026, 17:501,878-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:371,879no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:241,879first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

782 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535974986976018254039250.1%
custom 542031577199149730710012.8%
custom 53594093175083122859612.3%
custom 5359390638695543866769.72%
custom 5449372007432985754597.54%
526.65%
custom 547195298697026716370.895%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 782reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 16 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GoodVibesClub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 October 2025 to 14 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 May 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,110 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

The crew is locked in. Excited to co-sponsor the Good Vibes Club Vibeathon Time to ship 🤙

custom 5359749869760182540247custom 54493720074329857546custom 53594093175083122855

7 May 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,380 views59 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

sails up Good Vibes Club !🤙

custom 53597498697601825403910custom 535939063869554386610

11 Mar 2026, 19:13 UTC≈2,210 views71 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Year one in the books 1️⃣ Vibetown is just getting started 🤙

custom 542031577199149730735custom 535974986976018254024custom 535939063869554386612

14 Jan 2026, 19:41 UTC≈3,590 views79 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Collector Rewards Update 🤙📈 $375K+ and climbing. The Vibewheel is alive — stacking $VIBESTR, $PNKSTR, and GVCs nonstop. 200+ GVCs moved via VibeStrategy in the last few days, burning another 5% of supply. Positioning matters: • Badges are the alpha • Premium Badges = more weight (Grails, Rares, Mid-Rares getting scarce) • Deeper alignment → heavier impact as the pool grows • $VIBESTR Badges count too (69K for Blue

custom 542031577199149730734custom 535940931750831228516custom 535974986976018254012custom 5449372007432985754125

18 Dec 2025, 18:41 UTC≈3,230 views44 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

✨Rondellus Goldsole✨ He’s everywhere, all at once. To find out more check out the full post @GoodVibesClub on X

custom 535974986976018254025custom 535939063869554386610custom 54719529869702671637custom 53594093175083122851custom 54493720074329857541

16 Dec 2025, 19:19 UTC≈2,900 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

GVC GIF FACTORY 🤙 New way to build inside Vibetown. Pick a GVC you own and pair it with a GIF that fits the character. The pairing is the story. How to enter: • Quote RT this post with your GVC + GIF • Drop it in the discord for extra visibility Winner becomes an official GVC GIF in the Vibetown library. A few extras may stick around for future use. The factory stays open. 🌴

custom 535974986976018254020custom 53594093175083122855custom 53593906386955438664custom 54493720074329857543

12 Dec 2025, 17:00 UTC≈2,550 views36 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Vibetown has opened a new portal ✨ Khakis on, mullet flowing, Craig is now playable inside Otherside. GVC holders can jump in as Craig starting today. Go show that mullet some range. 🌴

custom 535974986976018254019custom 544937200743298575411custom 535940931750831228542

10 Dec 2025, 14:58 UTC≈2,040 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Raffle Time in Vibetown 🤙 Two GVCs + 69k $VIBESTR each are up for grabs this week. Winners get pulled live on Friday. If you want in, hop over to goodvibesclub.io/raffle before 11am EST Friday.

custom 535974986976018254017custom 544937200743298575487custom 53594093175083122851

1 Dec 2025, 19:47 UTC≈2,230 views33 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

$20,000 Creator Tournament Good Vibes Club x Xeet 🌴🤙 Vibetown is opening a two week Flash Tournament. Dec 1 to Dec 15 Prizes: $20,000 in $VIBESTR Plus 3 GVC NFTs raffled to the Top 50 creators How to Enter: Post on X Tag @GoodVibesClub, $VIBESTR or just talk about Vibetown. Xeet determines rankings. Winners must follow the Xeet terms of service. Bring your best and let the vibes do the rest.

custom 535974986976018254021custom 53594093175083122855custom 53593906386955438663custom 544937200743298575431

13 Nov 2025, 16:27 UTC≈2,260 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Miami’s around the corner. Who’s making the trip out to Basel? 🏖

custom 535974986976018254023custom 53594093175083122859custom 542031577199149730781

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GoodVibesClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 176,615 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Good Vibes Club 🤙” (@GoodVibesClub), 1,871 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoodVibesClub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.