Channel
@theNeurologue
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
716subscribers
+145 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002555565803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theNeurologue |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theNeurologue |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 716 | +60 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:23 | 656 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:54 | 656 | +17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 639 | +27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 612 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 600 | +27 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 573 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 571 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (26 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,317 |
| Reactions total | 81 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
81 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 87.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.17% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یکی از باارزشترین حرکتهای جامعه نوروساینس توی ایران و خارج از ایران، که من هم کلی ازش سود بردم و لذت🥰 میتونم با خیال راحت بگم تو خیلی از زمینهها بچهها آموزش خیلی بهتری گرفتن، در مقایسه با خود نورومچ اصلی :))
❤13🔥2
🧠 نوروکانکت | بزرگترین مدرسهٔ نوروساینس ایران با وجود تقاضای زیاد و ارزش بالای مدرسه، از ابتدا تصمیم گرفتیم نوروکانکت رایگان برگزار بشه تا جای خالی نورومچ امسال برای ایرانیها احساس نشه. 🤝 برگزاری رایگان مدرسهای ۳ هفتهای در این ابعاد و با همراهی TAهای تمام وقت، فقط با حمایت مالی گستردهٔ جامعهٔ ایرانی خارج از کشور ممکن میشد و صمیمانه از همهٔ حامیان ممنونیم. ❤️ نوروکانکت رو یه تجربهٔ موفق و شروع مسیر تازهای بر…
❤13
زمانی که چیزی باقی نمانده و ما به آخر خط رسیده ایم، در آسمان ها تو مرموزانه به من میخندی. جایی که خندهات بارها و بارها انعکاس مییابد و چیز یا فردی به این قدرت وجود ندارد؛ و آن نوری که بر تو میتابد، همین را میگوید. وقتی که برمیخیزم در حال معلق زدنم_ برای کسانی که هیچوقت جرعت نکردند نام مرا به زبان بیاورند ● Artist: I Got you on tape ● Title: somersault ● Album: 2 ● Genre: Rock ● Year: 2007 @beyond_the_fence
❤1👍1
کلا همیشه مطالعات بایولوژی کمتر روی خانمها انجام شده. یک علت مهمش طبعا همون داستانی بوده که از سالیان دور، ریسرچرها بیشتر از جماعت ما مردها بودن و بایاسد به اینور داستان :دی، منتها بقول سوپروایزرم (که خودش هم خانمه) سمت دیگر ماجرا هم همین سختی ریسرچ روی خانمهاست: مغز مردها متغیرهای مداخلهگر کمتری داره و (از اینجاش بقول خودم:) در یک کلام، خیلی سادهتره! :)))
❤11👍2
اخیراً داشتم به این فکر میکردم که فیزیولوژی زنان چقدر در پژوهشهای مغز ~نادیده گرفته شده: کلی اثر مختلف گزارش شده که نشون میدن چرخهی قاعدگی میتونه بهصورت پویا هم سیگنال BOLD و هم فیزیولوژی مغز رو تغییر بده. از اون طرف، گزارشهای مختلفی هم هستن که نشون میدن تجربههای متفاوت در طول دورهی فعال باروری، از شروع پریود تا منوپاز/یائسگی، خودشون میتونن روی سلامت مغز اثر بذارن. تازگیها یه سری ریزالت خیلی جالب هم روی یک…
❤10👍1
"Breathing shapes brain activity, but prior work has characterized this coupling by aggregating across many breath cycles, leaving the fine-grained shape of individual breaths unexamined. Here, we show that the precise waveform shape of each breath is coupled to the shape of corresponding neural oscillation cycles in the human forebrain, on a breath-by-breath basis. Using invasive brain recordings from 16 epilepsy p…
❤1
و به «حرکت» هم محدود نمیشه و منتظر پیپرهای مشابه در زمینههای دیگه خصوصا higher order cognition باشیم..
❤1👍1
این دقیقا همون چیزی بود که پارسال بهش فکر میکردم👍👍👌👌 "The cortex and cerebellum split the labor: the cortex provides a stable, general-purpose movement blueprint, while the cerebellum reorients that same blueprint differently for each context" Granule cells reorient cortical trajectories to separate contexts https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10946-1 @theNeurologue 🧠
❤7
Four faces of information in natural systems (2026)
بچههایی که دوره مناسب برای دیتاست HCP میخوایین، این تقریبا بهترین دوره ممکنه که خود دکتر راجیمهر و دکترعبدالعلیزاده تدریسش میکنن.
❤5
🟢 دوره تخصصی آشنایی با دیتاستهای معتبر نوروساینس و ورکشاپ آشنایی با Human Connectome Project ▪️امروزه پژوهش در نوروساینس لزوماً به معنای تولید داده از نقطه صفر نیست. ▫️با توجه به هزینههای بالای تجهیزات و نمونهگیری در مطالعات نوروساینس، استفاده از دیتاستهای معتبر مسیری نوین برای بازتحلیل و انجام مطالعات جدید است. اما استفاده علمی از این منابع فراتر از یک دانلود ساده است. در این دوره به پرسشهای زیر پاسخ میدهیم…
❤1
~95% of first technology adoption happened through physical observation of artifacts in the world. Direct inventor-to-adopter contact was statistically indistinguishable from a shuffled null. The agents mostly learned technology by walking past it. That is stigmergy (the termite trick!) operating in societies of reasoning machines. Non-communicating societies win on portfolio breadth, held-out resilience, and valid…
⚡1❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @theNeurologue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Neurologue 🧠” (@theNeurologue), 716 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theNeurologue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.