Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Телеграм Маркетинг

@tgmarketing

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,717subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001058047847
TypeChannel
Username@tgmarketing
Created17 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tgmarketing

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Телеграм-маркетинг — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

6,870 average views per post against 6,717 subscribers — an engagement rate of 102.3%. Across the 39,652 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.02% and 25.9%, with a median of 13.9%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (16 July 2026 15 August 2026)
Posts measured8 of 8 published in the window (0 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled54,950
Mature posts only102.3% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers6,717 measured 13 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 39,652 channels · p10 3.39% · p25 7.02% · p50 13.9% · p75 25.9% · p90 42.8%
Position in cohort99.115th percentile · 7.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.087% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,7176,7236,7205 August 2026 — 6,723 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,723 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,722 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,717 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,716–6,724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:346,717-5
6 Aug 2026, 13:216,722-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:186,723no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:106,723first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.3%
avg views ÷ 6,717 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,870
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.388%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (7 July 202630 July 2026)
Views total54,950
Reactions total213
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

485 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁16734.4%
👍9820.2%
7515.5%
🤯5711.8%
🔥4910.1%
🌚204.12%
👏112.27%
😱81.65%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 485reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,970 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Банки спермы заморозили вклады Павла Дурова.

😁50🔥4👏3

30 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,580 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Быстрый ответ на вопрос, стоит ли суетиться, удалять ссылки и так далее. Нет, если вы не ведете деятельность, на которую могут могут нажаловаться сумасшедшие активисты, конкуренты с которыми у вас испорчены отношения и она в целом не вызывает претензий по духу у силовых структур. Если вы сидите тише воды и ниже травы, никто никого пинать не будет, так что для Телеграм-связанных активностей как всегда выгоднее страт

😁14🌚7😱3👏1

30 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈21,600 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я тут был в отпуске и почти без интернета, так что по факту внесения Пал Валерича в список террористом и экстремистов могу сказать только то, что вероятность, что любая белая финансовая активность (реклама с ерид, прием платежей с упоминанием Телеграм через белые эквайринги и так далее) будет крайне затруднена к концу осени. Про рекламу и раньше было известно (ФАС дал отсрочку). Телеграм с вероятностью в 100% будет

🤯21😁5👍4

23 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC≈22,800 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Павел Дуров переезжает в Батуми. Сложные времена, нужно экономить, в Дубае дорого. С пониманием.

😁25🤯7👍1

22 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,870 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

И снова возвращаясь к теме сообществ. Как многие знают, обычно я на эту тему пишу в Селёдку (свой второй канал), но так как мы с вами на нашем прекрасном рынке (телеграма и РФ — хоть и не все РФ, но телеграма точно) заперты в какой-то степени и выходов из этого у нас немного, кроме модели "сообществ", то расскажу и тут. 17 августа у ИнтерКомм и Сбер будет вторая по счёту конференция «Мосты», про внутрикорповые сообщ

🔥43👏2😁2

22 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,550 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ночью Телеграм запретил невидимые символы в именах пользователей и заменил их на прочерки. Этот пост сделан для того, чтобы я и вы могли его отправить тому самому человеку, который регулярно писал с невидимого аккаунта. НАКОНЕЦ-ТО АХАХА

😁20👍152🌚1

21 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,510 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как выразился мой бизнес-партнер: Ну что, ждем бана Телеграм вообще везде. Wallet перестал платить за размещение в скрепке и меню, как пить дать. P.S. все-таки надо объяснить. Идти на IPO имея за плечами судебное преследование во Франции лучше, если и кошелек и ТОН и иные активы будут от Телеграм, а не от уважаемых партнеров из Top.co. Тем более, на рынке ходят слухи, что Пал Валерич и Андрей Олегович (Рогозов) дале

😁4🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,070 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не раз и не два вижу как у людей из ИТ блокирует каналы по неизвестным жалобам на контент, и Телеграм предлагает писать на [email protected] (то есть на деревню дедушке). Народ не отсекает, за что. За что прилетело (с вероятностью в 99%) в последнем видимом случае: - инструкции и хаки по обходу региональных и санкционных ограничений со стороны Apple. Для разработчиков. Скрытие региона аккаунта и советы, как пройт

11👍1

16 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC≈18,200 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пп выноса Max и всех приложений ВК/ОК из Google Play и вероятного выноса vk.com (ВК переезжает на .ru). Как верно написали девочки из БП, никакого (или почти никакого) злорадства по этому поводу нет. Кстати, нет его и по поводу проблем Телеграма, что бы не думали некоторые из вас — у меня по крайней мере. Я 10 лет работаю с Телеграм, как основной площадкой. Я кровно заинтересован в том, чтобы у ТГ было все хорошо и

👍18😁125

14 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC≈22,700 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не мытьем так катаньем. Подъехал публичный ответ от держателя зоны Me по поводу ночного отключения t.me Похоже, что это была не ошибка, а вполне целенаправленное действие, которое будут активно использовать — банить весь t.me если у санкционного ресурса есть публичный адрес в ТГ. https://x.com/domainME/status/2077077395777994942

🤯25😱1

14 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,950 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Заметили, что Telegram в этом году как-то особенно бережно относится к финансовой отчетности? В январе в FT утекли неаудированные результаты за первое полугодие 2025 года: выручка выросла на 65%, до $870 млн. Правда, итогом стал чистый убыток в $222 млн из-за переоценки TON (удивительно, да?). Около $300 млн, то есть больше трети всей выручки, пришлось на «эксклюзивные соглашения», связанные с TON. Кроме того, за эт

👍10🔥75😁3

13 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC≈23,900 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Опять же, походу надо обьяснить. 1. Никакой прямой связи между шутками в Хвиттере и саспендом домена может не быть. И, вероятно, ее и нет. 2. Имидж и репутация работают так, что в какой-то момент, когда французская полиция/российское руководство/илон маск/черногорский оператор реестра/кто угодно другой имеют некие претензии к Телеграм, груз имиджа Дурова, совокупность публичного поведения аккаунтов и прочих коммуник

12👍3👏2🔥1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tgmarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 34,600 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TGStat.ru — Аналитика Telegram-каналов и чатов
@TGStat · 130,015
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Телеграм Маркетинг” (@tgmarketing), 6,717 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgmarketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.