Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Телеграм Маркетинг

Channel

Телеграм Маркетинг

@tgmarketing

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,631subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001058047847
TypeChannel
Username@tgmarketing
DescriptionПоследние пару лет я просто угораю про Телеграм. И иногда пишу что-то серьезное. Мысли, промо, реклама и интеграции: @teodorix
Created17 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tgmarketing

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Телеграм-маркетинг” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

6,6306,7246,6775 August 2026 — 6,723 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,723 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,722 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,717 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,716 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,720 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,724 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,712 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,708 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,696 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,689 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,685 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,672 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,651 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,643 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,637 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,630 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,634 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,631 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,648 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,644 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,638 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,639 subscribers13 November 2026 — 6,631 subscribers6,6315 August 202613 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 100 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,616–6,738 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 13:086,631-8
8 Nov 2026, 23:576,639+1
5 Nov 2026, 19:266,638-6
30 Oct 2026, 13:566,644-4
27 Oct 2026, 04:056,648+17
23 Oct 2026, 19:186,631-3
20 Oct 2026, 21:286,634+4
18 Oct 2026, 01:286,630-7
14 Oct 2026, 17:016,637-6
11 Oct 2026, 15:176,643-8
5 Oct 2026, 03:186,651-21
26 Sept 2026, 08:176,672-13
17 Sept 2026, 16:396,685-4
9 Sept 2026, 13:216,689-7
3 Sept 2026, 22:386,696-12
28 Aug 2026, 11:166,708-4
25 Aug 2026, 20:426,712-12
23 Aug 2026, 06:256,724+4
19 Aug 2026, 21:356,720+4
16 Aug 2026, 15:226,716first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 6,631 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held32 (7 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total21,597
Reactions total311
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
242
Videos
2
Links
555

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

850 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁42449.9%
👍12614.8%
❤8610.1%
🤯8610.1%
🔥627.29%
🌚323.76%
😱182.12%
👏161.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 850 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (90.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC907 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Это все вранье, Дуров же сказал что никаких уязвимостей нет и не было! Главное никуда не кликать в Телеграм! https://t.me/kasperskylab_ru/7881

😁15😱3

13 Nov 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,340 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Я, короче, понял. Завтра Дуров отключит всех ботов, кроме официальных (и уважаемых партнеров). А то развелось скама, виджеты испортили, скоты. Вуаля, проблема решена, если у тебя на платформе только качественные и проверенные сервисы.

😁17🌚6👍3👏2

13 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,360 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Телеграм отключил виджеты на сервере @ Дуров призвал ломать его через виджеты в лс @ Отправить сообщение его аккаунту стоит денег @ Телеграм прибылен!

😁28

13 Nov 2026, 15:44 UTC≈4,340 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Птички принесли на хвосте, что из-за виджетов вот буквально вчера/сегодня десктопный доступ к ТГ с рабочих компов корпы начали банить в экстренном порядке. Никакой РКН не справился бы лучше.

😁11😱2

13 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,530 views32 reactionsread 14 November 2026

выкатили виджеты @ всех взломали @ откатили виджеты p.s. если что, их отключили на сервере

😁30❤1😱1

13 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,350 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Кстати, тут спросили, знаю ли я, что Пал Лаичем называют Темнейшего обычно (ВВП). Канеш знаю. Наш его косплеит, только в меньшем масштабе и звание в ФСБ неформальное, даром что оба Весы и из Питера (хохотнул). Потому и Пал Лаич.

😁20👍2❤1

13 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC≈2,820 views38 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Пал Лаич призывает фаундеров избавляться от совета директоров. Видимо, чтобы без всяких помех и возражений заниматься всякой хуйней, как он в последние годы, и никто не мог сказать слова против. Чо такое система сдержек и противовесов и почему нужны равные партнеры и контроль даже над самыми талантливыми основателями, хоть это и неприятно, Пал Лаич делает вид, что не понимает. Пал Лаич так-то социал-дарвинист, типа …

😁20❤9👍8🤯1

11 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,330 views32 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Подписывайтесь на канал с сигналами Павла Дурова

😁32

10 Nov 2026, 22:14 UTC≈1,730 views44 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Пал Лаич 2016 — свобода слова, приватность, безопасность, Телеграм за Машу и Вашу свободу Пал Лаич 2026 — сидит и редактирует пост в тг-канале, пампя тон, купив его на всю котлету из 500$, после чего выкладывает скрины по мере роста курса — сперва там был скрин про 7%, потом 9, потом 11, на момент написания поста было 12%

😁36🤯6😱2

5 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,340 views29 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Чем хуже дела идут у Телеграм, тем тупее шутки их аккаунта в Твиттере. Это было несмешно уже лет 20 назад, если не больше

🤯17😁5🌚4👍3

30 Oct 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,550 views26 reactionsread 14 November 2026

В 2026 году вы можете доверять в Телеграм только пользователям, у которых в имени есть «Never DM you first». Если вам пишет кто-то без этого уточнения — это мошенник. Впрочем, если вам первым пишет человек с таким именем, он тоже мошенник т.к. соврал, что так не делает.

😁26

9 Oct 2026, 14:08 UTC≈29,300 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026

https://t.me/bponline/177035 Эт вряд ли «версия», девочки, кэширующие CDN есть в каждом важном регионе, РФ не исключение. Даже Ютуб, кажется, до сих пор какие-то имеет для РФ, хотя там были разборки всякие на тему обслуживания и его оплаты. CDN и кэширование нужны чтобы ваш Телеграм клиент не ломился, например, за каким-нибудь видео или превью на Ближний Восток или в Европу, и грузилось все быстро.

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @tgmarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @tgmarketing as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Telegram Info
@tginfo · 83,952
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
TGStat.ru — Аналитика Telegram-каналов и чатов
@TGStat · 131,887
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Tribute | Монетизация контента
@TributeNewsRU · 48,880
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026
Глеб Пройдов
@proydov · 18,710
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 October 2026
BotNews
@BotNews · 154,888
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026
Beta Info
@betainfo · 25,599
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Timeweb Cloud Alerts
@timewebcloud_alerts · 25,846
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
ohuenko
@ohuenko · 287,890
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Официальный канал Телеметра - Telemetr.me
@telemetr_me · 36,996
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Телеграм Маркетинг” (@tgmarketing), 6,631 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgmarketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.