Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юрист I Налоговый КонсультантI

Channel

Юрист I Налоговый КонсультантI

@taxfortax

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

296subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001878561261
TypeChannel
Username@taxfortax
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/taxfortax

Growth

296297296.57 August 2026 — 297 subscribers8 August 2026 — 297 subscribers16 August 2026 — 296 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:38296-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:04297no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:54297first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 296 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.1
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total379
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5238.2%
👍4130.1%
🔥1914.0%
😁64.41%
💯53.68%
👌32.21%
👀21.47%
💋21.47%
😱21.47%
🤝21.47%
👏10.735%
🤔10.735%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @taxfortax. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC34 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🌌 Где-то здесь ты живёшь в тревоге и платишь налоги… Эта картинка - не просто грустный мем, а идеальный тренажер для психики. Психологи называют такой взгляд космической перспективой - это легальный способ выключить суету, сделать глубокий выдох и напомнить себе: всё временно, а мы - часть чего-то огромного и прекрасного. 🪐 Иллюстрация: галактика Андромеда (М31). 📸 Фото: NASA / ESA / Hubble (общественное достояние

3👍1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC43 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💡 Правильный ответ: Да, это абсолютно реально! Конституционный Суд РФ (Постановление № 49-П) и Верховный Суд встали на защиту граждан. Если вас привлекают к личной ответственности по долгам компании (субсидиарка или убытки), вы имеете полное право пересмотреть первоначальный долг. Для вас, как для лица, не участвовавшего в старом деле, срок на подачу апелляции начинает течь только сейчас - с даты, когда вы официа

🔥21👍1🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Налоговая обязанность: товара нет, а обязанность платить осталась. ЧП на складах маркетплейса вскрыли системные уязвимости в бизнесе селлеров и жесткие налоговые требования. ✅Авансы платить всё равно придется: авансы по УСН платятся поквартально. Если товар сгорел в июле, это не отменяет обязанность до 28 июля заплатить налог за все продажи апреля, мая и июня. Денег на счетах нет, а обязательство перед ФНС осталос

2👍2💋1

4 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC51 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Реально ли отменить судебное решение, вступившее в законную силу 4-летней давности?

  1. 🔥 Да, если последствия этого решения наступили только сейчас!39%
  2. 🚫 Исключено. 4 года - это слишком много, все процессуальные сроки давно сгорели.22%
  3. ⚖️ Только при наличии форс-мажора (например, тяжелой болезни или комы).22%
  4. 🤔 Я не юрист, но мне интересен исход этого спора!28%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️ Эмоции на миллион: как заставить оппонента в суде сомневаться в вашей адекватности. Сегодня в Арбитражном суде Иркутской области я наблюдала бесценную картину. Лицо юриста истца в один миг выразило всю палитру чувств - от искреннего недоумения до священного ужаса. А случилось вот что: мы прямо в процессе заявили, что... обжалуем решение, на котором строится весь их иск. Всё бы ничего, но это решение вступило в

1👏1

3 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC62 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Налоговое закулисье маркетплейсов: сколько WB и Ozon приносят в бюджет страны? Ежедневные онлайн-покупки стали для нас привычкой. Но задумывались ли вы, какие колоссальные налоговые отчисления стоят за каждым кликом «Оплатить»? Давайте разберем реальные цифры и масштаб влияния на бюджет. По итогам 2025 года Wildberries официально подтверждает статус одного из ключевых налогоплательщиков России: 6,1 трлн рублей -

4👀2👍1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC89 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Однажды летом: коротко о том, почему юристы не отдыхают. В блоге в последние дни было тихо: у меня случился мини-отпуск. Точнее, отчаянная попытка его организовать. Попробуй выбери неделю, в которую: ✅ не выпадает сдача отчетности, ✅судья не назначит заседание на другом конце страны, проигнорировав ходатайство об отложении (естественно), ✅и не всплывут любимые клиенты с классическим «нам надо было еще вчера, спасай

5💯2🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC151 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚖️ Верховный Суд разрешил доначислять НДС физлицам без статуса ИП. Многие до сих пор живут с опасной иллюзией: «Раз я обычный гражданин и у меня нет ИП, значит, максимум, что мне грозит - это 13% НДФЛ. Никакой НДС меня не касается». ФНС и суды окончательно разрушили этот миф. Верховный Суд РФ в свежей практике закрепил жесткий подход: если гражданин ведет себя как бизнес, то и налоги он будет платить как бизнес.

👍53🔥2😱2

3 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC150 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawlyricsPhoto

А теперь о действительно актуальных юридических консультациях ☝🏼

😁4👌1👍1💋1

30 Jun 2026, 08:40 UTC180 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Операция "быстрые ноги": арест дебиторской задолженности 🚀 В продолжении поста. Если вы хотите защитить дебиторскую задолженность от налоговой, здесь не будет волшебной таблетки 💊, а быстрое обращение взыскания. Если приставы успеют принять постановление о переходе права требования к вам или дебитор напрямую перечислит деньги на счет ФССП до того как ФНС вынесет решение, вы успеете зафиксировать средства за собой.

1

25 Jun 2026, 05:02 UTC177 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Когда деревья были большими.👨‍👧💚 Вот и настал тот день, когда ты пришёл в суд защищать папу подруги детства от субсидиарной ответственности. Как это произошло? Быстро: жизнь проносится с пугающей скоростью. А судебный конвейер не оставляет времени для сантиментов. Тридцать лет назад время тянулось совсем иначе. Мы мчались летом на дачу по разбитой трассе на его «девятке». В салоне, перекрывая дребезжание дверей, н

7👍2👌1

24 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTC129 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы делили апельсин: дебиторская задолженность - новый актив для налоговой. Как делить её с бюджетом? 🍊 Налоговые инспекции уже полгода используют новые полномочия: теперь они вправе накладывать обеспечительные меры не только на вещи, недвижимость и деньги, но и на дебиторскую задолженность. Это стало возможным благодаря расширению понятия "имущество" в налоговом кодексе. Представим, что ваша компания уже наложила

🔥8👍42

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @taxfortax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Реально ли отменить судебное решение, вступившее в законную силу 4-летней давности?

  1. 🔥 Да, если последствия этого решения наступили только сейчас!39%
  2. 🚫 Исключено. 4 года - это слишком много, все процессуальные сроки давно сгорели.22%
  3. ⚖️ Только при наличии форс-мажора (например, тяжелой болезни или комы).22%
  4. 🤔 Я не юрист, но мне интересен исход этого спора!28%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 421,407 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юрист I Налоговый КонсультантI” (@taxfortax), 296 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/taxfortax.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.