Channel
@lawlyrics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,369subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001135234596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lawlyrics |
| Created | 6 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lawlyrics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 2,369 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 2,371 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 2,372 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 2,371 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 2,371 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,287 |
| Reactions total | 314 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,345 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5278356056202813919 | 977 | 72.6% | |
| custom 5341796824858508807 | 281 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5424827029545561660 | 84 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5330288584542927229 | 3 | 0.223% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,345reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lawlyrics. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Посмотрим, куда пойдет автор тейка после того, как ему квартиру сдадут с нарушениями всех норм строительства или соседи затопят. Как думаете, к врачу или к кальянщику? 🧐 Народная рубрика "Пни юриста" #pni
custom 527835605620281391937custom 53417968248585088079
Автор канала последние 5 лет очень плотно работает с лицензированием музыкального и не только контента для его последующего коммерческого использования. Поэтому я возьму на себя смелость написать несколько самых частых заблуждений, с которыми я сталкиваюсь сейчас в области использования IP в миру. Я не могу точно сказать, откуда они берутся: что-то явно из смешения американского законодательства, правил площадок (Ин…
custom 527835605620281391936custom 53417968248585088077
Забытая рубрика «Толстой, подвинься!» внезапно снова с нами ✨
custom 527835605620281391930custom 534179682485850880710
Удобное мнемоническое правило для новичков и не только: если вы пРодаете права, вы – лицензиаР, а если вы покупаеТе права – вы лицензиаТ 😉
custom 527835605620281391958custom 534179682485850880715custom 54248270295455616607
Понятно? Рубрика "Пни юриста" #pni
custom 527835605620281391958
Наткнулась на днях на термин "юрислоп". О, думаю, наконец-то, придумали и нам отдельное слово для лигал-галлюцинаций нейросеток. Как же жестоко я обманулась, погуглив 🤦♀️
custom 527835605620281391933custom 534179682485850880714
Примерно догадываюсь 😏
custom 542482702954556166023custom 527835605620281391918custom 534179682485850880710
Увидела в одной статье про соглашение для соавторов музыки термин соисполнители для лиц, исполняющих вместе музыкальное произведение. Звучит кошмарно и люто отдает статьей 34 УК РФ про ответственность соучастников преступления. В этой связи хочется рекомендовать всем причастным не использовать в договорах музыкальной индустрии слово соисполнитель, а заменить его на какой-то авангардный вариант типа "участники исполн…
custom 527835605620281391942custom 53417968248585088079
Вот ст. 1277 ГК говорит, что на похоронах допускается публичное исполнение музыки без согласия автора и выплаты вознаграждения в РАО. Интересно, кто первый устроит большой концерт без очистки прав рядом с кладбищем, поставив гроб с покойным сбоку от сцены? Думайте, подсказывайте.
custom 527835605620281391968custom 534179682485850880714custom 54248270295455616607
А теперь о действительно актуальных юридических консультациях ☝🏼
custom 527835605620281391951custom 54248270295455616607custom 53417968248585088074
С ним?
custom 527835605620281391939custom 54248270295455616609custom 53417968248585088078
Ставь 🌹, если ты высокомерно хотел выпендриться, ставь 🐈, если ты тратишь свое и чужое время, не ставь ничего, если в правках ссылаешься на законодательство. Народная рубрика "Пни юриста" #pni
custom 527835605620281391982custom 534179682485850880754
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lawlyrics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 258,773 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юрлирика” (@lawlyrics), 2,369 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawlyrics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.