Канал для предпринимателей о налоговой безопасности бизнеса
За 20 лет сохранили клиентам 1,4 млрд₽, прошли 1000+ налоговых проверок. Снижаем доначисления и риски при дроблении бизнеса и спорным контрагентам. Конфиденциально
Для связи — @lizabezpibot
Created
25 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,867–8,873 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 13:48
8,871
-1
12 Aug 2026, 17:44
8,872
+4
9 Aug 2026, 11:51
8,868
-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:20
8,869
no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:21
8,869
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 8,871 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
33 (23 July 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
36,519
Reactions total
650
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈176
Videos
≈4
Links
≈1,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
601 reactions across 27 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
210
34.9%
🔥
187
31.1%
❤
118
19.6%
🤔
47
7.82%
🤝
17
2.83%
👏
7
1.16%
🤣
5
0.832%
🥱
5
0.832%
👌
4
0.666%
🙈
1
0.166%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 650reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.03%
1 of 33 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
364
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,120
over 32 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxKYX6s
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Курс «Требования ФНС: Как отвечать, чтобы не доначислили. Практика 2026 г.».
Кто ещё не присоединился к нашему обучению по ответам на требования налоговой, напоминаем:
— Если вы сталкиваетесь с требованиями ФНС и боитесь серьёзной налоговой проверки;
— после ваших ответов налоговая присылает новые требования и вызывает на допросы;
— боитесь, что одно неверное пояснение или лишний документ приведут к доначислениям …
«Сами справимся» или как ответы в ФНС обернулись проблемами для бизнеса
Рубрика «Наши кейсы»
Компания несколько месяцев отбивалась от претензий ФНС самостоятельно. Директор с бухгалтером отвечали на требования, ходили на комиссии, давали пояснения. Казалось, всё под контролем. А потом стало понятно, что каждый их ответ только добавлял инспекции аргументов для доначислений.
Что произошло
Налоговая взяла компанию в…
Налоговая нашла разрыв по НДС. Что теперь?
Огоньков под прошлым постом вы накидали, продолжаем. Закончили мы на том, что работа с разрывами по НДС расписана во внутренних документах ФНС. Но разрывы бывают разные. Сегодня посмотрим, что происходит с теми, которые ФНС отправляет в отдельную углубленную отработку как сложные. Налогоплательщик этой внутренней кухни обычно не видит. Мы регламент прочитали. Начнём с вопр…
192 млн отбили у налоговой. А потом пришлось вернуть
Разбор судебного дела. ЧАСТЬ 2
Голосование закрыто, спасибо за огонёчки. А развязка начинается с того, что кассацию подала налоговая.
В апелляции «Честный Чек» отбил 192 млн, и именно этот кусок инспекцию не устроил. Управление ФНС пошло оспаривать ровно то, что бизнес у него выиграл.
Итог: кассация отменила победу бизнеса в апелляции и оставила в силе решение …
«Есть ли у меня признаки дробления?» ❌
«Сколько налоговая сможет заработать на мне?» ✅
Прежде чем искать признаки дробления, стоит ответить на другой вопрос: сколько денег налоговая сможет доначислить, если выиграет спор? Чем больше эта сумма, тем выше вероятность серьёзной проверки. Поэтому мы всегда сначала считаем цену риска:
• сколько НДС могут доначислить;
• сколько налога на прибыль или НДФЛ придётся доплати…
Как отбить 192 млн у налоговой. Хотя сначала всё проиграть.
Разбор судебного дела. ЧАСТЬ 1
Неделю назад разбирали «Муссон»: там победа бизнеса устояла во всех трёх инстанциях. Сегодня всё наоборот, проигрыш в первой инстанции, а через девять месяцев апелляция возвращает почти двести миллионов. Чем это кончилось в кассации, голосование в конце.
Знакомьтесь: ООО «Честный Чек», Калининградская область, производство ка…
Что делать, если в компании нет системы комплаенса и коммерческой осмотрительности?
Сценарий, знакомый большинству предпринимателей: пришел новый подрядчик/поставщик, быстро согласовали договор, начали работу и вдруг спустя полгода прилетает требование из налоговой. А вы даже не помните, кто его “пробивал”, по каким критериям выбирали, и были ли вообще какие-то документы. А менеджер, который этого контрагента прив…
Проверили контрагента по ЕГРЮЛ? Для налоговой этого может оказаться мало
Представьте обычную сделку. Компания закупила товар на 15 млн рублей. Поставщик работает не первый год, есть сайт и офис, в ЕГРЮЛ ничего подозрительного. Товар получили, документы подписали, НДС приняли к вычету.
Вроде всё нормально.
Через год налоговая начинает задавать вопросы. Сколько сотрудников было у поставщика? Где он хранил товар? У …
Две одинаковые уточнёнки, или как самостоятельно продлить общение с налоговой
Рубрика «Наши кейсы»
ИП подал декларацию по УСН с заявленным доходом около 19 млн рублей. Сумма соответствовала поступлениям по расчётному счёту, бухгалтер всё сверила.
В последний день камеральной проверки приходит требование: налоговая видит расхождение на 20 млн рублей. То есть расхождение оказалось даже больше дохода, заявленного пре…
Планов по комиссиям в инспекции нет. Планы есть по деньгам
Рубрика “Бывших не бывает”
В нашей команде работает налоговый консультант, бывший сотрудник налоговой инспекции. Он сам проводил комиссии по НДС, дорос до исполняющего обязанности начальника отдела, в подчинении было около полусотни инспекторов. В работе каждый квартал держал тридцать-сорок сложных организаций.
Мы задали ему вопросы, которые клиент обычно …
Кредит бухгалтера на 12 🍋 за долги клиента, дробление и доначисления на 26 млн, подарок от бабушки внучке ИП. Нескучные налоговые истории
Ежемесячная рубрика для тех, кто не успевает читать канал от корки до корки, но хочет оставаться в курсе важных налоговых историй.
Собрали статьи июля, которые вызвали больше всего обсуждений, реакций и вопросов. Где-то налоговая удивляла своей логикой, где-то суды, а где-то биз…
Сколько признаков дробления нужно, чтобы проиграть спор? А чтобы выиграть?
Разбор судебного дела. ЧАСТЬ 2
Налогоплательщик АО «Муссон» выиграло все три инстанции, доначисления на 43 миллиона сняты. Для тех, кто пропустил первую часть.
Досудебное обжалование не помогло, межрегиональная инспекция по ЮФО жалобу отклонила. Дальше суды:
✔️Арбитражный суд Севастополя, решение от 05.06.2025: в пользу налогоплательщика.
…
🔥17❤4🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @tax_pi_RU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если получили требование по прибыли, что стало причиной?
Убыток или низкая налоговая нагрузка24%
Вопросы по расходам10%
Запросили подтверждающие документы9%
Пока только пояснения14%
Требований по прибыли не было52%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если было требование по НДС, что именно заинтересовало инспекцию?
Разрывы по НДС20%
Контрагенты31%
Пояснения по декларации23%
Запросили документы22%
Продлили срок камеральной проверки11%
Требований по НДС не было34%
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как у вас прошла камеральная проверка за 1 квартал 2026?
Прошли спокойно46%
Были требования, закрыли сами37%
Были требования, обратились к налоговому консультанту6%
Требования не кончаются, боимся ВНП4%
Проверка ещё продолжается5%
Пока камеральной проверки не было10%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 15,372 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Нетипичный бухгалтер 🥇 @netipichniy_buh · 78,716 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Налоги без ПИ” (@tax_pi_RU), 8,871 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tax_pi_RU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.