Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

САЭ | Электромобили, батареи и EV

@t_ener

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

545subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001826412377
TypeChannel
Username@t_ener
Description⚡️Канал для тех, кому интересны электромобили, электробусы и аккумуляторные технологии 👤Автор канала - компания «Системы автономной энергии», российский производитель аккумуляторных батарей для электротранспорта 📧 Контакты для СМИ - @daria_samoylov
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/t_ener

Growth

5457 Aug 2026, 13:03 — 545 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:46 — 545 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:038 Aug 2026, 03:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 544–546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:46545no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:03545first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.3%
avg views ÷ 545 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (21 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,318
Reactions total117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
401
Videos
21
Links
83

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 22s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

215 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6027.9%
👍5324.7%
🔥4520.9%
94.19%
👏94.19%
🍾83.72%
🏆83.72%
🎉73.26%
👌62.79%
😁31.40%
🤔31.40%
❤‍🔥20.93%
💯20.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC152 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Еще один продукт САЭ признан полностью российской разработкой ⚡️В реестр включена литий-ионная аккумуляторная батарея “Вита”. Она уже успешно функционирует в составе вакуумно-подметальных машин ВКМ 2024Э — они убирают улицы Москвы. Но универсальность решения позволяет использовать его в любых системах электротранспорта. 🟩 Энергия батареи - 84 кВт.ч 🟩 Масса — 580 кг 🟩 Встроенный подогрев для работы зимой 🟩 Заряд

👍87🔥3❤‍🔥21

3 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC178 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ В Петербурге разрабатывают механизмы, которые простимулируют переход на электротранспорт. Об этом сообщил губернатор Александр Беглов. Конкретные меры пока не названы, но они станут частью экологической политики города. Петербург уже активно переводит на альтернативное топливо общественный транспорт: в городе работают электробусы и троллейбусы с автономным ходом, в том числе с батареями САЭ. Следующим шагом, по

👍5👌4🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC235 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @maximkadakovVideo

Электрический Ларгус: как он? Намедни прокатился на е-Ларгусе. Реальные машины в эксплуатации и с номерными знаками существуют )))

👏76🔥3

23 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC361 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В июле САЭ исполнилось 6 лет 🎉 За это время мы прошли путь от первых разработок до аккумуляторных решений, которые уже работают в реальном транспорте: на городских маршрутах, в электробусах, троллейбусах с автономным ходом и новых проектах электротранспорта. Для нас батарея — это инженерия, производство, испытания, контроль и ответственность за то, как техника будет работать каждый день. Спасибо команде, партнерам

🔥107🎉73

21 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC305 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В Коннектикуте фонарные столбы превратят в зарядные станции для электромобилей ⚡️ В штате готовят пилотный проект: зарядки будут устанавливать прямо на существующие городские опоры и фонари. Планируется разместить 40–60 станций примерно на 100 зарядных портов. Первые установки ожидаются уже в августе этого года. Идея простая: вместо того чтобы строить отдельную зарядную инфраструктуру с нуля, можно использовать то,

👍7🔥5

19 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTC266 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как у вас с электромобилями?

  1. 🔋 Уже давно перешел на «зеленую» сторону44%
  2. Присматриваюсь к «электричке» 👀21%
  3. 🚌 Мой электромобиль — это электробус по утрам13%
  4. ⛽ Верен ДВС25%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC262 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В Москве раскупили все электрокары 👀 На фоне бензинового кризиса подскочил спрос на электромобили. Если до этого в салонах Москвы продавалось по несколько электрокаров за месяц, то в июле сопоставимые продажи происходили уже ежедневно. Но есть нюанс: купить электромобиль стало сложнее. Интерес покупателей вырос быстрее, чем поставки, поэтому у дилеров уже не хватает электрокаров в наличии. На вторичном рынке ситуа

4👍2

18 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC237 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Финальный этап создания батареи САЭ — в кадре 🔋 На нашем производстве оборудование и ручная работа дополняют друг друга: часть операций выполняют машины, а там, где нужно участие человека, подключаются специалисты. Так и держим темп: собираем бодро, проверяем тщательно 👌 А вам желаем заряженных выходных ⚡️

👍6🔥521😁1

15 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC322 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему мощная зарядка не всегда означает быструю зарядку? ⚡️ Кажется логичным: чем мощнее зарядная станция, тем быстрее зарядится электромобиль. Но на практике все чуть сложнее 🤏 Скорость зарядки зависит сразу от нескольких факторов: 🔋 У каждого аккумулятора есть предел по мощности, которую он может безопасно принять. Если станция выдает 350 кВт, а автомобиль рассчитан на 150 кВт, быстрее он заряжаться не станет.

🔥52💯2

13 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC359 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В России появился электрический мини-гелик ⚡️ Марка ZIF начала продажи компактного электромобиля ZIF Morena. Создатели модели явно вдохновились Mercedes-Benz G-Class, но умньшили и электрофицировали легенду. Габариты у новинки действительно скромнее: 4010×1850×1850 мм. В электрической части тоже без лишнего пафоса: мотор мощностью 10 л.с. и литий-железо-фосфатная батарея емкостью 14,4 кВт·ч. Заявленный запас хода —

3🔥3🤔2

10 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC311 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Батареи САЭ появятся на скоростных беспилотных катерах на подводных крыльях 🌊🚤 Тяговые аккумуляторные системы «Сигма С» будут установлены на новые электрические автономные суда FLYMAR F8. Беспилотные катера получат комплект из 4 NMC-батарей🔋, емкость каждой — 20,4 кВт·ч при номинальном напряжении 350 В. За управление системой будет отвечать наша BMS. Она в реальном времени контролирует параметры работы, температуру

5🔥5👍4

7 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC365 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @maz_avtozavodecPhoto

🟪 На выставке «ИННОПРОМ» экспонирована новинка 2026 года — троллейбус третьего поколения МАЗ 303Т21 с увеличенным автономным ходом до 30 км. Машина создана в рамках стратегического сотрудничества Минского автомобильного завода с российской ГК «ИТЭЛМА» в части создания «союзного» электротранспорта. ❗️ Показательно, что именно на «ИННОПРОМЕ‑2025» в прошлом году был подписан ряд соглашений о сотрудничестве между МАЗ, И

👍864👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @t_ener. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

Как у вас с электромобилями?

  1. 🔋 Уже давно перешел на «зеленую» сторону44%
  2. Присматриваюсь к «электричке» 👀21%
  3. 🚌 Мой электромобиль — это электробус по утрам13%
  4. ⛽ Верен ДВС25%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 327,632 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“САЭ | Электромобили, батареи и EV” (@t_ener), 545 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t_ener.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.