2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,930–2,936 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 04:12
2,933
no change
12 Aug 2026, 02:45
2,933
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.72%
avg views ÷ 2,933 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.8
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
17 (10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
1,357
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 21s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2
66.7%
😢
1
33.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وزارة الدفاع تتبنى فكر القائد رسميا وتنعي فطائس مليشيا قسد وتصفهم بالشهداء وكان الشهاده رتبه عسكرية او وسام من بلاستيك يتم منحه حتى للعرصات والشراميط
تبني وزارة الدفاع لقتلى قسد ووصفهم بانهم جنود بالجيش السوري يؤكد ان الحكومه شريكه في جرائم مليشيا قسد ضد ابناء المكون العربي في الحسكه فهي تقف موقف المتفرج والمشاهد من بعيد وكان الاحداث تقع في كولومبيا وليست في رقعه محسوبة على هذا الشبه وطن
وصف الحكومه لفطائس قسد بالش…
بين هاتين الصورتين... حكاية شعب، وسنوات من الصمود والمعاناة والتضحيات.
أحسب، حين كان على عرشه وبين جنوده، أن هؤلاء المستضعفين سينتصرون يوما ويقتصون منه؟
إنها عدالة الله في الدنيا.
#محاكمة_عاطف_نجيب
قاضي محكمة الجنايات الرابعة في دمشق: المحكمة قررت دمج العقوبات بحق المجرم عاطف نجيب وتنفيذ أشدها وهي الإعدام
قاضي محكمة الجنايات الرابعة في دمشق: المحكمة قررت تجريم المتهمين لؤي العلي وقصي ميهوب ووفيق ناصر وطلال العيسمي بجنايات القتل والاعتداء والحكم عليهم بالإعدام
قاضي محكمة الجنايات الرابعة في دمشق:
أثبتت التحقيقات وأقوال الشهود تورط المتهم عاطف نجيب في التحقيق مع عدد من المعتقلين عقب اندلاع الاحتجاجات في درعا
📌 فرع الأمن السياسي في درعا الذي كان يقوده المتهم، اقتحم المسجد العمري في درعا برفقة فروع أمنية أخرى
📌 عاطف نجيب كان يقود الحملة الأمنية على المدنيين في درعا، والتي سُميت بـ "المصيدة"، وفقاً لما ورد في استجوابه
📌 قاضي محكمة الجنايات الرابعة في دمشق: عاطف نجيب كان يقود الحملة الأمنية على المدنيين في درعا والتي سُميت بالمصيدة وفقاً لاستجوابه
📌الأفعال المنسوبة إلى عاطف نجيب وفقاً للتحقيقات وأقوال الشهود هي جرائم ضد الإنسانية
📌مساهمة المجرم بشار الأسد في الجرائم كانت مساهمة صاحب القرار الأعلى وسخر لها أجهزة الدولة
📌 المجرم بشار الأسد فاعل معنوي في كل الجرائم المرتكبة بحق الشعب السوري حتى لو لم يرتكبها بيده
#الرقة
احتجاجات في منطقة تل ابيض شمال الرقة على ما قام به حزب العمال الكردستاني حرق علم الجمهورية العربية السورية في منطقة عين العرب
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kabossay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
زينو ياسر محاميد @zainaldinmaham1 · 474,947 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
كابوس جرابلس @Jarablous_Jarablous · 146,128 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كابوس ادلب⚔️الكابوس⚔️” (@kabossay), 2,933 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kabossay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
