Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Суспільне Житомир

Channel

Суспільне Житомир

@suspilnezhytomyr

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

47,543subscribers

+204 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001278718368
TypeChannel
Username@suspilnezhytomyr
DescriptionУсі новини в одному місці. Офіційний канал Суспільного #новини #житомир #житомирщина #суспільне #suspilnezhytomyr #суспільнежитомир
Created16 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/suspilnezhytomyr

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@suspilnezhytomyr/38611 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC@trukha_UA7/309387 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC1.00under a minute
@suspilnezhytomyr/38612 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC@trukha_UA7/309397 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC1.00under a minute
@suspilnezhytomyr/38624 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC@trukha_UA7/309517 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@suspilnezhytomyr/38627 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC@trukha_UA7/309547 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@suspilnezhytomyr/38628 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC@trukha_UA7/309557 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@suspilnezhytomyr/38634 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC@trukha_UA7/309618 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@trukha_UA716 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (160)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 46 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @zhytomyrmilitaryadministration. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

47,33647,54347,439.56 August 2026 — 47,339 subscribers6 August 2026 — 47,339 subscribers6 August 2026 — 47,336 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,357 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,387 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,480 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,501 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,532 subscribers15 August 2026 — 47,543 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +204. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,305–47,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:5647,543+11
12 Aug 2026, 15:5447,532+19
11 Aug 2026, 14:5547,513+12
10 Aug 2026, 15:4147,501+21
9 Aug 2026, 14:1647,480+93
8 Aug 2026, 14:2347,387+30
7 Aug 2026, 16:5147,357+21
6 Aug 2026, 17:1247,336-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:0047,339no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5547,339first reading

Engagement

200 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 47,543 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,960
200 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.865%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
200
of 200 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held200 (5 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total1,591,111
Reactions total13,763
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 02:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
17,500
Videos
777
Links
26,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,763 reactions across 200 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏4,27331.0%
😢2,69419.6%
1,93214.0%
🤬1,84113.4%
👍1,2959.41%
🤔6524.74%
🤯4613.35%
💔1841.34%
😱1811.32%
🔥1010.734%
👏630.458%
👎500.363%
🫡200.145%
👌60.044%
🕊60.044%
🏆40.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 200 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,763reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 00:22 UTC≈1,060 views17 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🟢 Житомирська область — відбій повітряної тривоги!

🙏17

15 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC≈1,940 views34 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🔴 Житомирська область — повітряна тривога! Повітряні сили ЗСУ: Загроза застосування балістичного озброєння з півночі. 02:47 — балістичні ракети на Київ з півночі 02:48 — ще ракети на Чернігівщині у напрямку Києва

🙏23🤬92

15 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC≈1,980 views18 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🟢 Житомирська область — відбій повітряної тривоги!

🙏18

15 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC≈2,610 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🔴 Житомирська область —повітряна тривога!

🙏27🤬111

15 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈5,770 views66 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Трактор, екскаватор і навантажувач — техніка, яку опановують 15 жінок із різних областей України на Житомирщині. Серед учасниць — 44-річна Тетяна з Миколаєва. До повномасштабної війни вона працювала на глиноземному заводі, а з 2023 року розміновує деокуповані території. Тепер навчається керувати екскаватором. Як проходить навчання, які посвідчення отримають учасниці та що розповіла Тетяна про нову професію — читайте

42👏16🤬3👌2😢2🤔1

15 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈6,120 views50 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

У Центрі підтримки переселенців «ЯМаріуполь. Житомир» підбили підсумки дворічної діяльності з моменту відкриття осередку. Завдяки роботі центру переселенці з Маріуполя та Маріупольського району, які живуть у Житомирі, мають можливість отримувати різні види допомог — від гуманітарної та юридичної до психологічної, соціальної та медичної.

🙏32👍8💔71🤬1😢1

15 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈6,830 views42 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

У Бердичеві Тиждень молоді, присвячений Міжнародному дню молоді, завершився турніром зі стритболу 3×3 серед аматорських команд. На спортивному майданчику зустрілися молодь, ветерани і військовослужбовці 26-ї та 68-ї окремих артилерійських бригад. Докладніше про те, хто переміг і кому переможці передали свій приз, читайте на сайті Суспільного.

👏27🔥65🏆4

15 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈6,700 views116 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @suspilnednipro

Сили оборони України повернули під контроль 19 населених пунктів на фронті. Ще шість сіл, за даними DeepState, були зачищені від російських військових. Як зазначив співзасновник проєкту Руслан Микула, армія РФ не залишала ці населені пункти самостійно — українські військові проводили наступальні дії, вибивали противника та брали його військових у полон. Крім того, за його словами, російські війська також намагаютьс

63🙏34🔥8👏6🤬3🤔1🤯1

15 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈6,810 views109 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

У продовження опублікованого на Суспільне Житомир матеріалу про 46-річного Андрія Стесюка, який 6 серпня помер у приміщенні Коростенського районного ТЦК та СП, журналісти Суспільного побували в Овручі та поспілкувалися з матір’ю Андрія. Також Суспільне звернулося за коментарями до поліції, адвоката, ТЦК та уповноваженого Верховної ради України з прав людини. Детальніше про це дивіться у випуску програми «Тиждень Жит

🤬56😢36💔10🤔43

15 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈6,810 views127 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @suspilnenewsVideo

Зеленський підтвердив, що вночі Сили оборони уразили одне з ключових підприємств у складі «Роскосмосу» — центр «Прогрес» у Самарській області РФ. Українські військові вдарили по ньому ракетами «Фламінго». Також президент підтвердив влучання по аеродрому «Саваслейка», де базуються носії «Кинджалів» на відстані близько 700 кілометрів від кордону. А також повідомив про ураження нафтового об’єкта в Усть-Лузі. Відео: Te

73👍46🤬4🙏4

15 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈7,050 views65 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Від сьогодні почала діяти заборона на вилов раків на водоймах Житомирської області. Її впровадили на період другої линьки раків, під час якої вони скидають панцир та хітинову оболонку очей і зябер, через що стають майже нерухомими та беззахисними перед браконьєрами. Розповідаємо, на який період часу запроваджують заборону та які штрафи доведеться сплатити порушникам.

👍47🤔96🤯3

15 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈7,700 views46 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

У вихідні на Житомирщині переважатиме антициклональний характер погоди. За словами синоптиків, буде сухо, сонячно та тепло, а 16 серпня температура повітря вдень підвищиться до +28...+33°: детальний прогноз погоди.

31🤔12🕊3

Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @suspilnezhytomyr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@suspilnezhytomyr edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 313,538 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Новини Житомира | pzhytomyr
@zhytomyr · 112,121
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Труха⚡️Житомир
@truexazhitomir · 138,826
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q12104629 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelSuspilne Zhytomyr
YouTubeUCGh1isqBcoqpJmp-TYq8kmQ
Official sitehttp://zt.suspilne.media

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Суспільне Житомир” (@suspilnezhytomyr), 47,543 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suspilnezhytomyr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.