Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Surf Code Repeat

Channel

Surf Code Repeat

@surfcoderepeat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

742subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001331274655
TypeChannel
Username@surfcoderepeat
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/surfcoderepeat

Growth

7327427376 August 2026 — 732 subscribers6 August 2026 — 732 subscribers14 August 2026 — 742 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 731–744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:55742+10
6 Aug 2026, 16:12732no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:49732first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

523 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19036.3%
🔥19036.3%
👀438.22%
👍366.88%
👏224.21%
🥰122.29%
😭91.72%
🌭61.15%
🕊40.765%
🙏30.574%
🌚20.382%
🍓20.382%
💔10.191%
💩10.191%
😁10.191%
🙉10.191%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 523reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2023 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jan 2026, 01:07 UTC593 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://x.com/surfcoderepeat/status/2008706719665496523

🔥14🙉1

8 Jul 2025, 21:53 UTC≈1,210 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

simulation shows 1 million of the next 1 million crypto startups are going to 0 run your own crypto startup here: https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/eb49c4d6-5038-4e46-a7f8-df6351d0a2ff?fullscreen=true

🔥14😭95👀2

8 Aug 2024, 02:20 UTC≈3,310 views190 reactionsread 6 August 2026

New thing soon

🔥116👀41👍13🌭65🥰5🌚2👏1

29 Dec 2023, 15:13 UTC≈3,610 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

25% of all FP that will ever exist is burned already https://fxtwitter.com/surfcoderepeat/status/1740751725386952887

🔥21🥰61

6 Dec 2023, 17:07 UTC≈2,940 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Think frenPet is going good, users are down since last week as was expected after a cycle of low attention span pepes, but overall still good: - players are paying to use the game - 600k transactions on base, 2nd most used app after FT - 500 regular returning users - 24% of all $FP that will ever exist is already burned by players - FP is the token with most individual holders on base after bald If the burn remains

43👍12🔥7👏4

20 Nov 2023, 03:49 UTC≈2,780 views84 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Been some crazy 3 days! FrenPet is taking off rn didn't sleep much but moments like this is what I live for in my "job". Only downisde is not giving much attention to my daughter but it's just 3 days. Obviously most crypto apps lose attention after a weeks, so hard to consider something in crypto a "success", I am practical and realist. think once we stabilize the app backend and bring more ppl in, this can reach p

57👏15🔥12

6 Sept 2023, 14:41 UTC≈2,150 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Think if you are still in crypto but not on friend tech you are really missing out and should join. We are so few ppl left active, ft really is a good place to meet new people and talk to ppl who stayed despite all the shit we've been through. When 100s of millions of ppl join this movement next years, you will remember and prioritize who stayed through the shit Even if you are down bad now, the ppl who stayed are

31👍6🕊4💔1

31 Aug 2023, 07:09 UTC≈1,970 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Some ppl are pming me why i don't airdrop them for this or for that, to join the game was literally $0.50 cents, and rn it's like $20 i think. I created limits so anyone can join, just try it and if you have fun play and if not it's ok too.

18🙏3💩1

31 Aug 2023, 03:33 UTC≈1,820 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

We are launching in the next hour a game for the base hackaton if you want to join @frenpet

🔥6🍓2

28 Aug 2023, 06:20 UTC≈1,750 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

5 more invites, app is live on goerli testing rn. we launch in a day or two https://t.me/+VkVv8Virg4EwZmE5

🥰1

25 Aug 2023, 20:15 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 6 August 2026

5 more invites planning for users to test the sign up flow on testnet today, and launch shortly after https://t.me/+8NYY1Zwo1H8wZDhh

23 Aug 2023, 04:32 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

5 more invites. Testnet and more info will come out in the coming two days. https://t.me/+Cn3PJbn8UEg1ZjZh https://t.me/+9WKu-aYSs1A0NTM5 https://t.me/+Z_3heWHhVLtkNTVh https://t.me/+t6M2AYaRZQA4NTdh https://t.me/+YvBM1rU9uf83N2Ex

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @surfcoderepeat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 107,986 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Surf Code Repeat” (@surfcoderepeat), 742 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/surfcoderepeat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.