Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mztacat's FAM 🧩 [ NO-DISCORD A.T.M]

Channel

Mztacat's FAM 🧩 [ NO-DISCORD A.T.M]

@mcatfam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

23,486subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001934147119
TypeChannel
Username@mcatfam
DescriptionNODE -- ALPHA -- WAIT-LIST -- TECH ⭐️🧩 Just be Early!!!.... 👏✨ Managed & Owned by @mztacat Careful please, admin in group bans. watch your words.. let's all respect each others. Adding you back is beyond my capacity as the group is looking to eliminat
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mcatfam

Growth

23,48623,55823,5227 August 2026 — 23,558 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,551 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,545 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,529 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,523 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,520 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,508 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,504 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,486 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,475–23,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:5823,486-18
14 Aug 2026, 06:1923,504-4
12 Aug 2026, 19:2323,508-12
11 Aug 2026, 17:2223,520-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:1523,523-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:4223,529-16
8 Aug 2026, 17:3723,545-6
7 Aug 2026, 20:1523,551-7
7 Aug 2026, 10:1523,558first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 23,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,150
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held25 (13 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total82,990
Reactions total888
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,380
Videos
36
Links
1,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

939 reactions across 25 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
60364.2%
👍12413.2%
😁10611.3%
🔥626.60%
😢222.34%
🤯70.745%
👻60.639%
😍50.532%
🐳30.319%
10.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 939reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 25 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mcatfam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.00%
1 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,590
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,510
over 24 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
iandotxyz127 July 202627 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC≈1,590 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Received my second-best X payment in a while. I think Elon has flipped the script somewhere. This time, I will be giving out all the reward! I'm competing for an NVIDIA DGX Spark on localAI https://x.com/mztacat/status/2088492851051012186

🔥2811

13 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,310 views26 reactionsread 16 August 2026

I tried @axisrobotics a few weeks ago with my PS5 controller; the result was impressive. One of those Interesting projects to check in the looming Era of AI and robotics, as they are building a full data engine for Physical AI. https://x.com/mztacat/status/2087826464607506873

22🔥4

13 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,360 views67 reactionsread 16 August 2026

I used to have a pal who leak me inside info on listing before the public (I somehow lost touch after multiple DMs) Crazy. It's been 2 years still can't find em' from the heap of messages. EDIT; I never took it seriously as I think it was cheating back then , not knowing it's called unfair advantage in Crypto

😁4412😢6🐳3👻2

13 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,410 views31 reactionsread 16 August 2026

I traded meme for a week, make sum money but I've not been the same since then - Mentally drained - Airdrop & Farming - Devving platforms - IRL & Family Oh, today is left-handed day - still gat that one to work on Yooo.. its crazy lately man.

24😢7

12 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC≈2,650 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Everyone wants to be a fucking DEGEN lately If you've got nothing to do and want to experiment 🧪 https://opensea.io/collection/thesaudis

👍21😁71

9 Aug 2026, 02:39 UTC≈4,250 views41 reactionsread 16 August 2026

The Galleria NFT; 2,618 Supply Whitelist Steps: Visit: https://galleria.theflorentines.xyz/ - Collect 33 coins by completing tasks or browse all 2,618 artworks - Submit wallet - Wait for whitelist confirmation OR you can buy and hold a floretine NFT which costs $143 (optional) https://opensea.io/collection/the-florentines

41

5 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC≈4,850 views31 reactionsread 16 August 2026

which upcoming ICO are you looking forward to and why?

25🔥5👍1

4 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC≈5,240 views40 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

If I was an iPhone fan and Telegram gets blocked from Apple Ecosystem, I'll stop using iphone But GG! DFKM Ref: https://x.com/durov/status/2084686326540996625?s=20

29😁11

4 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈4,890 views17 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

🗯️ mztacat Quoted Cloudflare Cloudflare has announced Cloudflare Wallets, a programmable wallet for agentic internet. This can be seen as an extension of the agentic web, previously based on the x402 monetisation gateway. Nothing serous here, just Agentic reservations Each agent is given a readable handle, which can be used for future verification and identity proofing. Reserve yours now; https://t.co/cmwBCvgcvn

12👍5

4 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,990 views15 reactionsread 16 August 2026

🗯️ mztacat Quoted mztacat Upbit announced the listing of $QUID Also, participants in the Legion sale will be able to receive their $QUID tokens immediately upon release through the Legion app. The token ticker is QUID. This reminds me of Boundless; the only difference is the current market condition Contract address: 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53. - $45M FDV sale (Legion, Kraken) - Currently tra

👍123

3 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈3,410 views20 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Squid TGE will be held tomorrow, August 4th. The exact launch time and further details will be announced separately through Squid's official channels. https://x.com/i/status/2084247184829022337

20

30 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC≈4,820 views67 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

🗯️ mztacat Quoted mztacat Apparently, these are the permissions from Paybox MCP - You can choose how actions are handled in ChatGPT - Plugins can extract your data (which is why the 'Developer' option is enabled, but in the case of Paybox, you need the Developer option to install the plugin After going through these, I have decided to interact with my Agent on Claude (it does Agentic interactions) - For con

52👍8🤯7

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @mcatfam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mztacat's FAM 🧩 [ NO-DISCORD A.T.M]” (@mcatfam), 23,486 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mcatfam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.