⚠️ ONGOING: OGUsers currently has zero staff members Following Bevo (@dagger) and @Eviona stepping down from the team, oguser.com currently does not have an active staff members. Admins Arc (@frog) and Cry (@melon) are single handedly solving disputes. 👀 Will there be a promotion soon?
Views per post sit far above this size band
3,550 average views per post against 3,410 subscribers — an engagement rate of 104.2%. Across the 8,336 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 3.55% and 20.0%, with a median of 9.27%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 56,850 |
| Mature posts only | 104.2% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 3,410 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:eng · 8,336 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 3.55% · p50 9.27% · p75 20.0% · p90 36.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.112th percentile · 11.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.087% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
