🐻 Бурого медведя могут вывести из списка лимитированных видов для того, чтобы регулировать его популяцию Правительство рассмотрит такую возможность, рассказал вице-премьер РФ Дмитрий Патрушев. Нападения медведей на людей участились в последнее время в ряде регионов России. В Забайкалье и Иркутской области введён режим повышенной готовности из-за активности хищников. Число бурых медведей в России выросло за год на …

Channel
СТРЕЛА
@strela_newz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,974subscribers
-843 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001551780175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @strela_newz |
| Description | Самые важные новости и не только Ссылка для друзей: https://t.me/+aqFXEb_G39VjMmFi Связаться с нами @feedbackstrelabot |
| Created | 6 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/strela_newz |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 59,974 | -97 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 60,071 | -64 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 60,135 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 60,142 | -30 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 60,172 | -43 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 60,215 | -90 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 60,305 | -16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 60,321 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 60,329 | -34 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 60,363 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 60,369 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 60,391 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 60,409 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 60,427 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 60,458 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 60,475 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 60,499 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 60,510 | -32 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 60,542 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 60,556 | first reading |
Engagement
1,214 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.83%
- avg views ÷ 59,974 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,100
- 636 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.24%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 636
- of 1,214 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 630 of 636 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,214 (6 August 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 699,600 |
| Reactions total | 8,634 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 16:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈38,000
- Videos
- ≈22,100
- Links
- ≈46,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 33m
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 576 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,156 reactions across 991 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 2,393 | 16.9% | |
| 🤬 | 2,313 | 16.3% | |
| 😁 | 2,191 | 15.5% | |
| 🤣 | 1,516 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 1,337 | 9.44% | |
| 😱 | 1,155 | 8.16% | |
| ❤ | 1,113 | 7.86% | |
| 🔥 | 868 | 6.13% | |
| 🤯 | 258 | 1.82% | |
| 😢 | 244 | 1.72% | |
| 👎 | 204 | 1.44% | |
| 🤔 | 168 | 1.19% | |
| 👏 | 113 | 0.798% | |
| 🙏 | 55 | 0.389% | |
| 🍾 | 49 | 0.346% | |
| 🕊 | 36 | 0.254% | |
| 👀 | 33 | 0.233% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 0.233% | |
| 😐 | 33 | 0.233% | |
| 😎 | 13 | 0.092% | |
| 4 further kinds | 31 | 0.219% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 994 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🏚 Снизить ставку по семейной ипотеке до 6% с 1 октября можно, если первоначальный взнос составит не менее 50% стоимости недвижимости Либо же можно за первый год погасить половину кредита — правила действуют независимо от количества детей в семье и региона приобретения жилья, пояснили в Минфине РФ. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
😁1
🛴 СК предложил ввести права на электросамокаты СК России предложил обязать электросамокатчиков получать права и запретить езду на них детям до 16 лет. Также ведомство выступает за запрет самокатов на тротуарах и пешеходных дорожках. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
🤡7👍4
🤪 В Псковской области провели «крещение Луны», чтобы «сделать её православной и соединить с Россией» Для этого байкеры и писатель Проханов организовали молебен и крестный ход с освящением «лунного камня», которым оказался обычный булыжник. В конце программы участники отправились покорять небо на макете лунохода. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
🤡7🤯4
🤔 Экс-главу второго отдела по расследованию особо важных дел СКР по Ростовской области Евгения Черноскутова нашли мертвым в квартире На момент смерти он находился под домашним арестом по делу о взятках, злоупотреблении полномочиями и других преступлениях. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
👍5😁3🔥1
🤢 ТНТ выпустил трейлер своей новогодней пародии на «Очень странные дела» в стилистике русских народных сказок И это говно кино снова будут показывать в кинотеатрах. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
🤬6🤡3
👊 В Москве грабитель средь белого дня догнал прохожего и избил ради телефона и 10 тысяч рублей Пострадавшего увезли в больницу, злоумышленника нашли и задержали. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
🤬4
💸 Водитель задолжал почти 950 тысяч рублей за стоянку на парковке в Шереметьево Мужик решил, что дешевле будет оставить автомобиль в аэропорту. Сколько машина простояла там, неизвестно. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
🔥2🤬1
🚘 Россияне оформляют многолетние кредиты ради покупки авто Средняя длительность автокредита достигла рекордных 6 лет, пишут «Известия». Причиной называют резкий рост цен на машины и утильсбора: с 2020 года новые авто в среднем подорожали в 2,4 раза, с 1,5 до 3,5 млн рублей, подержанные — с 0,5 до 1,2 млн. За ввоз иномарки утильсбор уже может превышать 2 млн рублей. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
🤣2🤬2
🤷♂️ Со слов «денег нет» стартовало первое заседание Госдумы нового созыва «Мы во время выборов слышали много популистских обещаний — и ипотека под 3%, и повышение пенсий. Но мы прекрасно понимаем, что на все эти обещания денег нет», — сказала депутат Авксентьева. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
🤣25🤬7😁2❤1👎1
💰Более 3 млрд рублей изъяли у бывшего гендиректора «Русагро» Максима Басова Суд взыскал в доход государства его активы, включая акции «Яндекса», «Лукойла» и «Норникеля». Также у родственников основателя «Русагро» Вадима Мошковича изъяли деньги и акции компании. Мошкович и Басов обвиняются в мошенничестве и злоупотреблении полномочиями. Оба вину не признают. СТРЕЛА | ПРИСЛАТЬ НОВОСТЬ
😁5🍾1👍1
🌮 Голодный медведь устроил дегустацию на рынке в Аспене В штате Колорадо медведь-барибал забрел на фермерский рынок и устроил себе «ревизию» на прилавке пекарни. Хищник встал на задние лапы и с аппетитом уплетал свежий хлеб и выпечку. Видео быстро разлетелось по соцсетям, набрав сотни тысяч просмотров. Полиция Аспена применила отпугивающие средства, и медведь забрался на дерево, а затем покинул территорию. СТРЕЛА…
👍7😁5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,214 posts we hold for @strela_newz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@nevzorovtv · 1,014,219#1
@ateobreaking · 708,254#2
@novosti_efir · 3,969,794#3
@nexta_live · 771,869#4
@vatnoeboloto · 382,750#5
@mash · 3,110,586#6
@astrapress · 345,208#7
@gorodglupov · 155,883#8
@meduzalive · 1,122,482#9
@insiderukr · 2,187,989#10
@slvn_pomet · 282,556#11
@utrofevralia · 12,090#12
@Pravda_Gerashchenko · 314,739#13
@eshkinkrot · 223,307#14
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402#15
@chtddd · 456,090#16
@ejdailyru · 671,042#17
@varlamov_news · 1,060,678#18
@truexanewsua · 3,127,466#19
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,177#20
@shot_shot · 1,265,657#21
@voina_belgorod_novosti · 1,119,745#22
@voynareal · 1,514,585#23
@oko_ua · 1,178,797#24
@mozhemobyasnit · 464,090#25
@moscowtimes_ru · 126,476#26
@sotaproject · 103,913#27
@PolitCircus · 100,802#28
@gulagru · 153,901#29
@PolitKrem · 82,726#30
@uniannet · 706,499#31
@stalin_gulag · 300,733#32
@news_sirena · 124,150#33
@tvrain · 460,824#34
@bbcrussian · 387,211#35
@generalsvr · 280,766#36
@dmytrogordon_official · 289,763#37
@u_now · 3,863#38
@readovkanews · 2,014,901#39
@theinsider · 152,549#40
@Netvru · 83,719#41
@ru_FTP · 86,847#42
@pezduzalive · 371,700#43
@libertypeople · 97,374#44
@Sandymustache · 212,050#45
@russia_news · 111,037#46
@otsuka_bld · 160,444#47
@yigal_levin · 219,033#48
@UaOnlii · 1,571,617#49
@economica · 1,546,042#50
@sharikovtime · 12,969#51
@currenttime · 145,291#52
@beregofic · 36,921#53
@radiosvoboda · 102,058#54
@oko18_ukr · 313,145#55
@kazansky2017 · 149,018#56
@MirovichMedia · 106,189#57
@stranaua · 332,543#58
@worldprotest · 58,452#59
@gremtelegram · 114,563#60
@AteoGo · 159,452#61
@agentstvonews · 103,697#62
@kolokol_21 · 37,916#63
@Crimeanwind · 225,781#64
@vert2026 · 117,714#65
@oprichniksday · 34,108#66
@dwglavnoe · 83,157#67
@warblizko · 30,031#68
@russia_gde · 34,610#69
@novaya_europe · 117,011#70
@mpartisans_news · 32,189#71
@novaya_pishet · 210,709#72
@SerpomPo · 57,241#73
@Tsaplienko · 321,310#74
@bpla_radar12 · 788,961#75
@wind_sower · 40,627#76
@kompr · 47,742#77
@ve4niyvoy · 113,471#78
@leonidnevzlin · 42,296#79
@mediazzzona · 165,369#80
@rusnews · 23,928#81
@bazabazon · 1,565,293#82
@NetGulagu · 114,333#83
@Nackepelo · 212,531#84
@istories_media · 126,185#85
@abbasgallyamovpolitics · 85,808#86
@PlushevChannel · 98,277#87
@mobilizationnews · 132,838#88
@voinasordoy · 200,967#89
@brieflyru · 100,756#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@criminal_echo · 21,261
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 September 2026
@zlnmayak · 44,361
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 September 2026
@russianlivenews · 25,496
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
@Voina_zhest_novosty_video · 128,675
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
@zazhigalka_news · 39,162
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 16 September 2026
@mpartisans_news · 32,189
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
@chto_gov · 57,109
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СТРЕЛА” (@strela_newz), 59,974 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strela_newz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.