Channel
@crime_plan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,311subscribers
-480 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001215014121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crime_plan |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crime_plan |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 26,311 | -24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 26,335 | -37 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 26,372 | -21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 26,393 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 26,403 | -20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 26,423 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 26,431 | -28 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:08 | 26,459 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 26,471 | -27 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 26,498 | -21 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 26,519 | -18 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:11 | 26,537 | -33 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 26,570 | -78 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 04:22 | 26,648 | -88 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:15 | 26,736 | -108 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 26,844 | +91 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 26,753 | -40 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 26,793 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 26,813 | -23 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 26,836 | first reading |
498 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 245 of 249 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 498 (5 August 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 304,270 |
| Reactions total | 3,690 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 300 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,424 reactions across 487 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 1,993 | 23.7% | |
| ❤ | 936 | 11.1% | |
| 🤣 | 595 | 7.06% | |
| 💊 | 585 | 6.94% | |
| 😁 | 563 | 6.68% | |
| 🤯 | 510 | 6.05% | |
| 👍 | 503 | 5.97% | |
| 😱 | 444 | 5.27% | |
| 😢 | 391 | 4.64% | |
| 😡 | 347 | 4.12% | |
| 😭 | 328 | 3.89% | |
| 🤡 | 232 | 2.75% | |
| 💔 | 133 | 1.58% | |
| 🙏 | 131 | 1.56% | |
| 😐 | 109 | 1.29% | |
| 🕊 | 88 | 1.04% | |
| 😨 | 88 | 1.04% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 0.641% | |
| 🤮 | 53 | 0.629% | |
| ❤🔥 | 50 | 0.594% | |
| 23 further kinds | 291 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 492 of the 498 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,424 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crime_plan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 498 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFG7qFN9 | 1 | 22 September 2026 | 22 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 498 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Сообщником матери, похитившей собственную дочь в Башкортостане, оказался бывший парень девушки. 43-летняя Рузалия была разведена с погибшим отцом своей 18-летней дочери и не имела право претендовать на 12 миллионов компенсации за гибель бывшего мужа. По задумке женщины, бывший парень ее дочери, которая к тому моменту уже получила 5 миллионов и ждала ещё 7, должен был подойти к ней в парке с цветами, мило болтать, и…
🤬9😁2🤡1😡1
Житель Ленобласти убил сожительницу и полтора месяца прожил с ее разлагающимся трупом, упакованным в скотч и полиэтилен. 8-го сентября 41-летний ранее судимый житель поселка Металлострой в порыве ревности до смерти забил свою 32-летнюю сожительницу. Осознав, что натворил, он тщательно замотал тело в целлофан и скотч, после чего планировал расчленить его, но вместо этого просто закрыл комнату и остался жить в кварти…
В Ленобласти 34-летний мужчина нашел банковскую карту и на радостях купил себе 10 чизбургеров За час он потратил более 4 тысяч рублей. Обвиняемый признал вину и возместил ущерб владелице карты. Уголовное дело о краже с банковского счёта направили в суд.
😁10
Директор вебкам-модели, которая накануне зарезала своего бывшего парня, приехал просить отпустить девушку под залог в 500 тыс. Он готов лично заплатить деньги. В суде девушка не смогла сдержать слёз, закрывала лицо руками и отворачивалась от камер. По данным 112, в ночь, когда всё произошло, 22-летний Вадим пришел к своей бывшей 21-летней Юлии в квартиру на Нижегородской улице. Предположительно, мужчина был пьян. В…
🤬9🤡1
Лариса Долина стала жертвой мошенников. Снова. Она вместе с Шаляпиным и Волочковой рекламировала интернет-магазин «АйфонБерри», после покупок в котором около 200 россиян остались без смартфонов и 10 млн рублей, пишут СМИ. Покупателей заманивали скидками до 30% на технику Apple, Dyson и Samsung. Клиенты вносили полную предоплату за доставку из Дубая за 30 дней, но в итоге заказы не пришли, а деньги не вернули. Снач…
🤡14🤔1😁1
Студенты шантажировали подростка, чтобы обокрасть её родителей в Великом Новгороде. Двое ранее незнакомых молодых людей — 21-летний парень из Твери и 18-летняя девушка из Санкт-Петербурга — прибыли в город по указанию телефонных мошенников. Аферисты, представившись сотрудниками Центробанка и силовых ведомств, запугали 15-летнюю дочь хозяев дома, что якобы её родители переводят деньги в недружественную страну и заста…
🤡3😁1
Мать и сын зарубили сожителя топором в Новосибирской области — ему нанесли 69 ударов. Инцидент произошёл в ноябре 2025 года в Чановском районе. Между женщиной и мужчиной вспыхнула ссора. За мать заступился её 21-летний сын. Вместе они избили сожителя руками и ногами, а потом зарубили его топором. Пострадавший скончался в больнице. Уголовное дело направлено в суд на рассмотрение, сообщили в региональном СК.
🤬3😈1
В Башкирии мать похитила и держала в заточении свою 18-летнюю дочь, чтобы отобрать у неё выплаты за погибшего бывшего мужа. Как стало известно «Базе», 43-летняя женщина подбила на похищение знакомого иностранца — 15 октября они подкараулили девушку на прогулке в парке Стерлитамака, затолкали в машину и вывезли в частный дом, где заперли. По версии следствия, так мать хотела добиться согласия дочери на то, чтобы под…
🤬9❤2😁2🤣1🤷♀1
Водитель «шевроле ланос» облетел пробку в Шушарах по пешеходным и велодорожкам — легендарный «мост глупости» пополнился неожиданным героем. Пока остальные стояли в заторе и честно ждали рассасывания пробки, мамкин шумахер пронёсся мимо на скоростях, снял свой заезд и хвастливо залил в инет. Там дорожный перформанс собрал почти 90 тысяч лайков.
🤬4❤2
Обезглавившему троих детей американцу назначили дату смертной казни В Техасе 46-летний Джон Аллен Рубио, осуждённый за убийство и обезглавливание троих детей, признан способным осознавать предстоящую казнь. Её назначили на 12 ноября. В 2003 году Рубио вместе с партнёршей Анджелой Камачо убил трёхлетнюю Джулиссу Кесаду, 14-месячного Джона Рубио и двухмесячную Мэри Джейн Рубио. Младшая девочка была его дочерью, двое …
🤬13❤3
Арматура пробила задницу и остановилась в сантиметре от сердца подростка из Кировской области 12-летний парень любил прыгать по гаражам и в один из дней неудачно приземлился Металлический штырь прошел от тазовой области вдоль передней брюшной стенки и остановился всего в сантиметре от сердца — ее аккуратно достали на экстренной операции, не задев внутренние органы Недавно его выписали, ему предстоит долгое восстан…
🤯16😱2❤1💯1🤣1
Курьера избили из-за замечания ребёнку в Новосибирске. Парень привёз заказ к дому на Петухова. Пока он звонил в квартиру, мальчик подошёл и потрогал его велосипед. Курьер сделал замечание, в ответ на которое мать ребёнка начала скандалить, материться и не пускала доставщика в подъезд. После конфликта курьер уехал, а когда вернулся к дому с новым заказом, его прямо под камерами сбил с велика, избил и заставил извиня…
😡23🤬6💊3🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 498 posts we hold for @crime_plan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@crime_plan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КРИМИНАЛЬНЫЙ ПЛАН / CRIME PLAN” (@crime_plan), 26,311 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crime_plan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.