Pourquoi tu dois lire régulièrement ? 📚
➊ Ton cerveau travaille 🧠
➋ Ton vocabulaire s'étoffe 🗣
➌ Ta créativité est stimulée 💡
➍ Ta mémoire s'améliore 🤩
➎ Plus de connaissances 📖
contact : @nousecrirebot
Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/lescribe
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,897–43,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:01
42,963
+46
16 Sept 2026, 19:57
42,917
-16
14 Sept 2026, 23:36
42,933
+2
13 Sept 2026, 09:36
42,931
-3
11 Sept 2026, 13:58
42,934
-11
8 Sept 2026, 19:18
42,945
-24
5 Sept 2026, 12:18
42,969
-5
3 Sept 2026, 13:01
42,974
-12
2 Sept 2026, 06:26
42,986
-7
1 Sept 2026, 07:45
42,993
-1
30 Aug 2026, 06:44
42,994
-14
29 Aug 2026, 06:25
43,008
+8
28 Aug 2026, 09:12
43,000
-18
27 Aug 2026, 08:33
43,018
+20
26 Aug 2026, 11:18
42,998
-33
25 Aug 2026, 14:14
43,031
-6
24 Aug 2026, 13:47
43,037
-9
21 Aug 2026, 12:46
43,046
+4
20 Aug 2026, 14:12
43,042
-7
19 Aug 2026, 16:12
43,049
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.55%
avg views ÷ 42,963 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,670
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.718%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
48 (3 April 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
40,408
Reactions total
285
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 01:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,420
Videos
≈50
Links
≈160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,664 reactions across 47 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,046
62.9%
🤣
251
15.1%
👍
142
8.53%
🔥
53
3.19%
🙏
53
3.19%
😁
46
2.76%
👏
28
1.68%
👌
17
1.02%
🤡
7
0.421%
😱
4
0.24%
⚡
2
0.12%
✍
2
0.12%
🎉
2
0.12%
😈
2
0.12%
🤔
2
0.12%
🤩
2
0.12%
🆒
1
0.06%
💔
1
0.06%
💯
1
0.06%
😨
1
0.06%
1 further kind
1
0.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 48 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LeScribe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 April 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🦍🐒 👨🏽🌾
Quand les babouins et les singes ont appris que l'homme qui les chassait du champ de maïs était mort, ils ont célébré son décès avec joie.
L'année suivante, il n'y avait pas de maïs à piller dans le champ.
C'est à ce moment-là qu'ils ont réalisé avec douleur 😭 que le défunt fermier était leur source de nourriture !
👉🏼Apprenez à ne jamais souhaiter de mal à autrui.
➨ @LeScribe
10 Livres pour Percer les Secrets de l'Univers : quand l'Histoire, la Science et la Foi se rencontrent
"Des lois hermétiques du Kybalion aux énigmes scientifiques de La Formule de Dieu, en passant par les textes interdits d'Hénoch et les secrets de la Kabbale... Plongez dans une collection unique qui réunit les plus grands textes de la sagesse cachée et les thrillers ésotériques les plus captivants. Préparez-vous à …
✨ La plus belle des carrières ✨
J'ai demandé à un sage : — « Dites-moi, monsieur, dans quel domaine pourrais-je réussir une belle carrière ? »
Il m'a répondu avec un sourire :
Soyez un bon être humain.
Il y a une immense opportunité dans ce domaine.
Vous y trouverez très peu de concurrence.
☯️ L'HISTOIRE DES DEUX VASES CHINOIS.
Une vieille dame chinoise possédait deux grands vases, attachés chacun à l'extrémité d'un bâton pour pourvoir les porter sur les épaules.
Un des deux vases avait une fissure et l'autre était entier.
A la fin du long trajet qui la ramenait de la fontaine à la maison, le "vase entier" arrivait toujours plein et celui avec une fissure arrivait à moitié vide.
Pendant plus de deux…
Dernier texte de Mariama Ba sur son lit de mort.
On se réveille débout, on s’étire. De l’air frais par la fenêtre ouverte, les délices d’un bain tiède. Et l’on prend à bras le corps la journée. Pas le temps de visiter une connaissance ! Point de répit pour s’asseoir ! De temps en temps biensur, une courbature désagréable qui ankylose les hanches, calmée très vite par des frictions. Et l’on avance ragaillardi, bâtiss…
☮️ Les Sagesses du Scribe
Les gens ne regardent jamais votre corps, ils regardent votre âme. En fait, le corps ne devient très important que lorsque vous n'avez pas d'âme. Il arrive parfois qu'une personne laide se dote d'une âme si belle que l'on oublie sa laideur et qu'en sa présence, elle soit d'une beauté extraordinaire. Le contraire se produit également. Il y a de belles personnes qui n'ont que de beaux corps. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @LeScribe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝐋𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞 @leportail · 20,659 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 September 2026
𝐙𝐞́𝐫𝐨 𝐅𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐞 🇫🇷 @orthographisme · 21,423 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 September 2026
Bibliothèque @EpubFR @Bibliotheque_EpubFR · 51,881 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 25 August 2026
CahiersJaunes ♤ @CahiersJaunesX · 27,421 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
L'oasis des médecins ✨ @MedOasis · 26,467 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
PourLaCulture 🔰 @Culturos · 27,191 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
CLES DU POUVOIR @ClesduPouvoir · 28,819 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
Bouquins & Culture @livres_2020 · 51,147 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 August 2026
INSPIRAT™ @winner_en_serie · 51,422 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
𝗦𝗼𝗶𝗳_𝗱𝗲_𝗦𝘂𝗰𝗰𝗲̀𝘀➪™️ @Soif_de_Succes · 30,148 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
💻 Cabuntu Solution 📱 @les_pros_du_tic · 43,828 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
𝘽𝙀𝙇𝙇𝙀𝙎 𝘾𝙄𝙏𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉𝙎 🌹 @bellescitations · 24,108 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Univers Motivation ⚡️ @UniversMotivation · 28,618 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 9 September 2026
Le Citateur Méchant 👨🎓 @LeCitateurM · 25,277 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
🎬 FILM EN ACTUALITÉ @filmromantique1 · 64,114 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 21 August 2026
𝙻𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚣-𝚟𝚘𝚞𝚜❓ @curieusement · 29,834 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
𝑷𝑬𝑵𝑺É𝑬𝑺 𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑰𝑻𝑰𝑽𝑬𝑺 🧠 @Pensee_Positive · 83,011 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
𝗔𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 @amazing_forex_trading · 31,819 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Planète animée FR @cartooncloud · 32,868 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 4 September 2026
🎧 ᗰOOᗪ ᑕIᑎEᗰᗩ 🎬 @MoodCineFr · 143,333 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 16 August 2026
Motivation Citations @Motivations_Canal · 41,149 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 29 August 2026
O-Zone™ - OTAKU @OtakusZone · 43,848 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 28 August 2026
LIVRES EN PDF 📚 @deslivresenpdf · 90,893 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 17 August 2026
NOUVELLE ÉCOLE @NouvelleEcoleFrance · 26,685 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐋𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞™️” (@LeScribe), 42,963 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeScribe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.