🤡🤚 Zelensky plonge l'Ukraine dans le pire effondrement démographique de l'histoire moderne. Au premier semestre de 2026, le ratio de décès par rapport aux naissances en Ukraine a grimpé à 3,55, se rapprochant du chiffre de 3,77 enregistré au Cambodge sous le régime des Khmers rouges en 1976, et dépassant le chiffre de 3,21 observé pendant la guerre civile au Rwanda. 📊 La population ukrainienne est en déclin constan…

Channel
FIN/TECH
@Fintechnewsfr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,247subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001805730970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fintechnewsfr |
| Description | FIN/TECH vous offre une couverture inégalée et impartiale de tout ce qui touche à la finance et aux cryptomonnaies en temps réel | Les tweets ne sont pas des conseils financiers. Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/CRYPTOFOX_INFOS |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fintechnewsfr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 10,247 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 10,254 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 10,268 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 10,272 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 10,279 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 10,286 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 10,287 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 10,292 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 10,295 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.6%
- avg views ÷ 10,247 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,190
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.112%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (2 July 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,773 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,090
- Videos
- ≈100
- Links
- ≈445
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
BREAKING 🇺🇸Trump menace d'augmenter les tarifs douaniers à l'égard du Canada en raison de ce qu'il considère comme une « négligence délibérée » causant des incendies de forêt qui polluent l'air à travers les États-Unis. ✅REJOIGNEZ : @Fintechnewsfr
❤4
BREAKING La dette nationale américaine a atteint 39,5 billions de dollars. ✅REJOIGNEZ : @Fintechnewsfr
🚨 Encore une "station-service" ukrainienne réduite en cendres ➖D'épais nuages noirs s'élèvent au-dessus de Tcherniguiv après une frappe russe sur une station-service utilisée par l'Ukraine comme centre d'approvisionnement militaire, où étaient stockés du carburant, des munitions et du matériel, à proximité immédiate de zones résidentielles. ⚡️SOUTENEZ-NOUS :@EcoMark-infos
JUST IN La Chine exige que le détroit d'Ormuz reste ouvert et sûr pour tous les navires commerciaux. ✅REJOIGNEZ : @Fintechnewsfr
DERNIÈRE NOUVELLE : $64 000 Bitcoins ✅REJOIGNEZ : @Fintechnewsfr
ANALYSE Le ratio PEG prospectif des actions américaines est tombé à 0,80, un niveau qui suggère généralement que le marché pourrait être sous-évalué par rapport à la croissance attendue des bénéfices. Il y a deux scénarios possibles : Scénario haussier : les prévisions de bénéfices pilotées par l'IA s'avèrent précises, faisant des valorisations actuelles un point d'entrée attrayant avant une nouvelle hausse du S&P…
❤1👏1
BREAKING 🇨🇺 Le réseau électrique national de Cuba s'est effondré. ✅REJOIGNEZ : @Fintechnewsfr
INFOS OpenAI a proposé au gouvernement américain une participation de 5 % Selon le Financial Times, OpenAI aurait proposé à l'administration Trump une participation de 5 % dans l'entreprise afin de réduire les risques politiques et de « partager les avantages de l'IA avec la société ». La participation devait être placée dans un fonds spécial similaire au Fonds permanent de l'Alaska. Avec une valorisation d'OpenAI…
🔍ANALYSIS La capitalisation boursière mondiale a atteint un record de 166 milliards de dollars, en hausse de 32 milliards de dollars (+23,6 %) par rapport à l'année précédente. Le Dow Jones augmente tandis que le S&P 500 stagne, les investisseurs se tournant vers des secteurs défensifs face aux doutes sur le retour de l'IA, ce qui pourrait potentiellement orienter la liquidité vers les cryptomonnaies. Les marchés a…
BREAKING 1 250 000 000 000 dollars ont maintenant été effacés du marché boursier américain au cours des trois dernières heures. C'est plus que la capitalisation boursière totale de Bitcoin. ✅REJOIGNEZ : @Fintechnewsfr
🔥3❤1
DIFFUSION EN DIRECT 🇺🇸 Le président Paul Atkins affirme que la SEC modernise les règles pour intégrer les marchés financiers "sur la blockchain". ✅REJOIGNEZ : @Fintechnewsfr
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Fintechnewsfr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 361,002 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FIN/TECH” (@Fintechnewsfr), 10,247 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fintechnewsfr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.