Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

阶跃云&Stepfly Cloud

@stepfly1337_cloud

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004439964779
TypeChannel
Username@stepfly1337_cloud
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 24 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/stepfly1337_cloud

Growth

135142138.57 August 2026 — 135 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:00142no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:56142+7
7 Aug 2026, 06:02135first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
157.6%
avg views ÷ 142 subscribers
Avg views / post
224
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.298%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total4,252
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮457.1%
228.6%
🤡114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026

节点维护完毕 ps:寻找Aff高手 佣金可谈 感兴趣可以开工单联系我们

7 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC85 viewsread 8 August 2026

我们优化了CloudFlare转发的优选IP获取方法 现在每15分钟会自动获取3网分别速度带宽最快的IP并且进行自动化替换

7 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC86 viewsread 8 August 2026

✅ CF优选更新 21:45 ─────── 实时快照 ─────── 电信 172.64.159.20 69.8mb/s [电信] 移动 104.18.43.178 14.4mb/s [移动] 联通 162.159.132.40 20.2mb/s [联通] BGP 172.64.152.68 14.5mb/s ─────── 本次更新 ─────── 电信 172.64.153.143 → 172.64.159.20 移动 104.16.200.102 → 104.18.43.178 联通 104.26.0.198 → 162.159.132.40

7 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

Cloudflare 转发出现问题 大家先切换到聚合入口 Cloudflare转发已维护完毕 电信用户可以畅快玩耍

6 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026

我们发现HKT1家宽使用的人数比较多 我们花重金再加一条1Gbps的HKT家宽 此外 韩国区域新增一台1.5Gbps的KT家宽 各位需要重新更新订阅链接即可

5 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC156 viewsread 8 August 2026

http://154.94.236.230/ 官方客户端已发布 有Bug可以开工单反馈

5 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC175 viewsread 8 August 2026

今日增加 伊拉克节点 澳门mtel家宽节点 目前澳门所有isp宽带运营商已添加完 注意 特别冷门地区绝不保证sla和延迟 各位仅需更新订阅即可 日本家宽即将添加

4 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC200 viewsread 8 August 2026

我们对聚合入口再次更新 此次我们针对大家反馈的 “移动速度上不去的问题” 进行了针对性的优化 我们重新重金购买了其他优化机进行尝试 我们需要大家继续尝试并且反馈 看看是否有部分地区移动跑不上去的情况 此次 我们也针对电信用户对聚合入口也重新进行了调整 速度应该也比之前更快 现在 你的选择不在局限于CF转发(当然 电信CF肯定是最爽的) 无需更新订阅链接 各位可以重新连接Anytls协议节点进行尝试 迷你杯用户无需理会此次公告 仅限其他套餐有聚合入口的用户尝试 我们的定制客户端正在路上 工程师正在努力的开发 将会在这几天进行公布 敬请期待

31 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC286 viewsread 8 August 2026

大部分节点已经可用了 大家需要重新上官网获取订阅连接 最新官网 stepfly.store 很抱歉今天 我们为所有有效期内用户增加3天订阅时间

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @stepfly1337_cloud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 542,019 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“阶跃云&Stepfly Cloud” (@stepfly1337_cloud), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stepfly1337_cloud.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.