@sridmtsho
🙏4
Signed K

Channel
@sridmtsho
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004402690105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sridmtsho |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 28 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sridmtsho |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 57 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 51 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 50 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,576 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
40 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 21 | 52.5% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 47.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@sridmtsho
🙏4
Signed K
The spiritual path is the path of commitment, total commitment. It’s not something to just do on weekends as an alternative to going out to the beach or partying. If one wants a real inner transformation, one has to work for it. Just as if you want to be a genuine musician, you have to train. I have friend who have a teenage son in Tasmania, an island off the south of Australia, and since he was very young he wanted…
❤2🙏1
Signed ཀུན་དགའ་དཔལ་འབྱོར།
I met a traveller from an antique land Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand, Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown, And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command, Tell that its sculptor well those passions read Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things, The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed: And on the pedestal these words appear: ‘My …
❤1
Signed ࿅࿆
When you die, it's very similar to when you fall asleep. When you're falling asleep, if you try to maintain your focus, sometimes you feel like you're slipping or sinking into the mattress. Before that, you've already closed your eyes and can't see. Then the sounds become distant and fade away. That feeling of slipping is a sign that the elements are dissolving, which we call dissolution, and this happens in death. …
🙏2
Signed ཀུན་དགའ་དཔལ་འབྱོར།
Homage to all Buddhas and Bodhisattvas. Thus did I hear at one time. The Bhagavan was dwelling in Anathapindada’s park, in the Jeta Grove in Sravasti, along with a large monastic assembly. The Bhagavan addressed the monks as follows: ‘Monks, four things are appealing, singled out, considered valuable, pleasant, and highly appreciated by everyone. What are those four? ‘Monks, good health is appealing, singled out, …
❤3
Signed ࿅࿆
Appearances are infallible dependent arising; Emptiness is the understanding that is free of assertions. As long as these two are seen as distinct, You have not yet realised the intent of the Buddhas. When these two realisations are concurrent, Where the mere sight of infallible dependent origination Concurrently destroys all modes of grasping through definite discernment, At that time the analysis of the (profound)…
❤2
Signed ࿅࿆
To truly gauge how deeply this practice has taken root in your life, measure yourself against Geshe Chengawa. He practiced without pause—he never even slept. Geshe Tonpa once urged him, ‘You really should rest, my son, or you'll make yourself ill.’ Chengawa replied, ‘Yes, I know I need rest. But when I consider how rare and precious this human life is—with all its freedoms and advantages—I simply cannot bring myself…
❤2
Signed ࿅࿆
On the idea that persons have no self, listen, O King! How is it that a person is a continuity of the five aggregates? Due to the cause, which is being filled by karma and the afflictions, The result flows out in the form of the five aggregates and their ‘self.’ Beings become attached to this self, As they take their own bodies to be ‘me’ and ‘I.’ This ‘self’ fears sickness, death, hunger, and cold. It is pleased b…
❤2
Signed ࿅࿆
Previously, up until now, I have seen enemies where there were none, and I have been tormented by anger. Now that I have recognized the true enemy, I will be devoted to nonself to fight that enemy. King Udayana of Vatsa, Advice to a King (2) Sutra @sridmtsho
🙏1
Signed ࿅࿆
To counter the enemy of conceptuality, With faith you must build a fortress of generosity and discipline, Then gather an army of virtue, don the armor of forbearance, Brandish the whip of perseverance, draw the bow of concentration, And slay the perception of a self with the arrow of nonself and emptiness. Advice to a King (2) Sutra @sridmtsho
🙏1
Signed ࿅࿆
Alas, it is like giving teachings to a stone! Most people in this world— To think of them brings sorrow welling up! They do not comprehend when taught, And explanation brings no understanding. Tomorrow death awaits them, but they think they’ll live forever. Saṃsāra does not sadden them, And of the will for freedom they have not the slightest trace. If they have knowledge, they are arrogant. If they have some understa…
🙏2
Signed Alldrik
The thought that perceives a self is the great enemy. While it is immaterial and without substance, It has dwelt with you since beginningless time. Since the very beginning, this enemy has stolen The wish-fulfilling jewel of dharmakāya And hidden it in the dense thicket of dualistic images. Even now it binds you still and forces you to wander in saṃsāra. Worldly enemies can do no more than kill and rob one’s wealth…
🙏1
Signed ࿅࿆
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sridmtsho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 347,241 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ocean of Existence” (@sridmtsho), 57 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sridmtsho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.