Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Советолог

@sovietologist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

817subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001596802509
TypeChannel
Username@sovietologist
Created5 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sovietologist

Growth

816817816.56 Aug 2026, 11:45 — 816 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:19 — 816 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 817 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:456 Aug 2026, 21:30
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 816–817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 21:30817+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:19816no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45816first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 817 subscribers
Avg views / post
340
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,774
Reactions total285
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯7024.6%
👍5117.9%
😁3813.3%
🔥3211.2%
😱269.12%
113.86%
🤔103.51%
👎82.81%
🥱82.81%
🤡72.46%
🤣72.46%
💊62.11%
😴20.702%
🤮20.702%
🥴20.702%
👻10.351%
💩10.351%
🤓10.351%
🤨10.351%
🤬10.351%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC228 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Буквально сегодня ночью. Если главная администрация на планете пишет такие посты, то может есть смысл задуматься о том, какие действительно перспективы коммунизма сегодня?)

😁8💯63👻1

6 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC226 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

К слову, отрывок на тему из самого Голосова. Очень советую эту книгу, одна из лучших политических книг про сегодняшнюю Россию и что может её ждать, хотя я с автором много в чём также и не согласен

5 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC292 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А ещё знаете, друзья, такой кайф работать с нейронками при написании исследований. Просишь сделать ссылку по госту — делают. Просишь от канцеляризмов текст избавить — избавляют. Просишь на опечатки и синтаксис проверить — пожалуйста. Прекрасно компенсирует нехватку усидчивости. В 2023 году мне таких технологических достижений очень не хватало.

👍6🥱32😴2🤓1🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC278 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В комментариях сказали, что эта позиция мной недостаточно артикулирована, поэтому решил написать о ней отдельно. Главная задача любых нормальных (читай — антикапиталистических, интернационалистических) левых в авторитарных условиях — любой ценой сохранить высокую степень организации. Вопреки распространённым утверждениям, она самоценна. Почему? Тот же Григорий Голосов в книге "Политические режимы и трансформации. Р

👍5👎1🤣1

5 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC283 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Друзья, кто-то знает интересную правую или центристскую историографию СССР, его возникновения и распада, написанную в 1980-1990-е, желательно (но не обязательно) бывшими членами КПСС и бывшими коммунистами? Под интересной я имею в виду содержащую оригинальные мысли

🤣2🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC299 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Но вообще насчёт выборов, я считаю, что любая стратегия бесполезна, пока за ней не стоит критическая масса людей. И тем более, должна быть одна позиция, а не 100500. У нас по этому поводу консенсуса нет даже внутри самих левых организаций, не говоря о трансляции такой позиции вовне. Эффективность невозможна без широкой сети организаций по всей стране, работающих в оффлайне. Здесь я ссылаюсь на опыт Союза марксистов,

👍17🤮2🤔1🥱1

5 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC255 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вообще крайне "забавно" видеть очередные дискуссии о природе российского режима и о выборах в сентябре. Видимо то, что после выборов "не будет, твёрдо и чётко" в октябре, а также, что эта природа делает с людьми типа Гарика, авторов этих дискуссий волнует значительно меньше. И это очень печально.

🥱31🤨1

4 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC215 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nullandvoidmediaPhoto

Просим о максимальном репосте. В Израиле перестал выходить на связь историк, журналист и писатель Артём Кирпиченок. 2 августа Артём прилетел в Тель-Авив рейсом из Еревана. Самолет должен был приземлиться в 10:50. В 10:41 он отправил сообщение: «Прилетел». После этого связь с ним оборвалась. Известно, что последний раз он был активен в социальных сетях около 10:46. Затем он больше не отвечал на сообщения и звонки.

😱26🔥31🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC351 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Зашёл к бывшим сопартийцам, а тут всё без изменений. Он бы сказал, что вы совсем с ума сошли со своим догматизмом.

😁30💯3

3 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTCviews —

Советолог pinned «Сейчас веду переговоры о издании своей книги на английском и немецком языках. Я буду издавать её не совсем в исходном виде, хочу переработать текст. В моих планах: 1. Учесть больше историографии по вопросам советской, постсоветской и мировой истории. …»

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC440 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сейчас веду переговоры о издании своей книги на английском и немецком языках. Я буду издавать её не совсем в исходном виде, хочу переработать текст. В моих планах: 1. Учесть больше историографии по вопросам советской, постсоветской и мировой истории. 2. Снизить порог входа в книгу. Объяснить моменты, которые для меня казались слишком очевидными, но для читателя - нет. 3. Расширить книгу, а именно: - углубить её

🔥123🤣3

2 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC434 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я не люблю Анатолия Вассермана по очень многим причинам, но больше десяти лет назад он выпустил книгу "Почему социализм лучше капитализма". И там есть вполне себе нетупая мысль о том, что чистый капитализм экономически эффективнее социал-демократических мер и рваного планирования, потому что он по факту шагает по головам там, где куча административных препон. Но вот чистый электронный социализм эффективнее их обоих,

🔥16👍5👎2🤡1🥱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sovietologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 526,799 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Советолог” (@sovietologist), 817 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sovietologist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.