Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Солнышкина Оксана

Channel

Солнышкина Оксана

@solnyshkina_oksana

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,847subscribers

+329 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001638303998
TypeChannel
Username@solnyshkina_oksana
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/solnyshkina_oksana

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Businessshake/233320 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC@solnyshkina_oksana/2461 · this entry20 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@solnyshkina_oksana/2467 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC@Businessshake/233829 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC1.0047 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Businessshake5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Businessshake (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Businessshake. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,49210,64210,0677 August 2026 — 9,518 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,492 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,807 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,693 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,594 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,972 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,278 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,221 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,642 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,564 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,529 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,488 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,438 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,398 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,352 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,315 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,147 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,034 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,978 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,847 subscribers9,8477 August 202618 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 41 days, net +329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,320–10,815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:219,847-131
13 Sept 2026, 18:579,978-56
12 Sept 2026, 03:1910,034-113
9 Sept 2026, 23:0010,147-168
6 Sept 2026, 19:2010,315-37
4 Sept 2026, 06:0210,352-46
2 Sept 2026, 15:4810,398-40
1 Sept 2026, 11:3310,438-50
31 Aug 2026, 08:0810,488-41
30 Aug 2026, 08:1610,529-35
29 Aug 2026, 07:4210,564-78
28 Aug 2026, 09:2310,642+421
27 Aug 2026, 05:5210,221-25
26 Aug 2026, 08:1310,246-32
25 Aug 2026, 05:4810,278+306
21 Aug 2026, 19:249,972+378
18 Aug 2026, 13:579,594-99
15 Aug 2026, 17:549,693-114
11 Aug 2026, 21:039,807+315
8 Aug 2026, 12:479,492first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 36 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 08s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,244 reactions across 32 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,42033.5%
❤1,41933.4%
🔥1,40533.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,244 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈1,020 views111 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @fairpvo

Идет очень важное для рынка обсуждение правил работы организаций владельцев облигаций. Банк России опубликовал для общественного обсуждения доклад «Институты коллективной защиты: новая модель регулирования». ЦБ предлагает усилить требования к представителям владельцев облигаций. Введение минимального уставного капитала (10 млн руб.), требований к деловой репутации и механизма исключения ПВО, у которых нет активно…

❤37👍37🔥37

25 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC979 views108 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Лизинг Диктант — проверьте свои знания и прокачайте экспертизу! 💼 Ассоциация ИФЛ запускает федеральный проект «Лизинг Диктант» — масштабную образовательную инициативу, которая поможет разобраться в тонкостях финансового лизинга и повысить финансовую грамотность. 🗓 Когда: 1–4 сентября 2026 года (онлайн). 📅 Приём заявок: 25–31 августа 2026 года. 🕒 Формат: 45 вопросов за 45 минут — вы можете пройти диктант в любой и…

👍48🔥34❤26

24 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC≈1,320 views122 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤43👍40🔥39

24 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC42 views518 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤198👍161🔥159

24 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,340 views159 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Дорогие, друзья💫 Я немного выпала из информационного поля 2-е конференции в подряд и 3 дня плотной работы - хорошая база для обдумывания и анализа. Уже завтра опубликуем результаты и выводы, а пока немного фото в ленту

👍56🔥53❤50

17 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,280 views122 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

Короткое видео из деловой беседы Оксаны Солнышкиной с Денисом Паламарчуком на тему : "Ключевая роль поддержки семьи и единомышленников в профессии" Полное видео можете посмотреть здесь: Ссылка на RUTUBE ссылка на YOUTUBE Ссылка на VK Приятного просмотра! Ищите нас здесь: 🤝Ссылка на сообщество в VK: https://vk.com/iflclub 🤝Ссылка на сообщество Солнышкиной Оксаны: https://vk.com/solnyshkina_oksana 📣Ссылка на ТГ канал…

👍43🔥40❤39

14 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,650 views322 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @NikolayNeAlexeyPhoto

Структура активов ИИС Инвесторы продолжают увелчивать средства на индивидуальных инвестиционных счетах. Общая сумма увеличилась до 992,7 млрд рублей по состоянию на 6м2026 года и прибавила 11,8% по сравнению с 12м2025. 473 млрд руб. или 47,65% составляют инвестиции в облигации: ОФЗ и субъекты РФ 184,6 млрд или 18,6% Корпоративный сектор 288,4 млрд, 29,05% Динамика по сегментам за первое полугодие +40,1% по ОФЗ и 20…

🔥113👍109❤100

14 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC691 views125 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @deltaleasingruPhoto

🔔🔔🔔Самое важное за неделю: читайте последние новости ⬇️ Экономика, ЦБ и политика 🔗Упрощение эмиссии ценных бумаг: перспективы реформирования 🔗Банк России рекомендовал кредиторам поддержать предпринимателей, пострадавших от терактов 🔗Названы товары, которые подорожают из-за роста курса доллара 🔗Мошенники начали маскировать троян под приложение оповещения об атаках беспилотников 🔗Годовая инфляция в России составила 6,0…

🔥44👍43❤38

13 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,170 views125 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

В каких сегментах лизинг спецтехники вырос более чем на четверть? По данным маркетингового агентства НАПИ, по итогам января-июня 2026 года лизинг спецтехники показал активный рост📈. Всего в лизинг было выдано 19,4 тыс. ед. спецтехники🚜, что выше прошлогоднего показателя на 30,5%. 🚀Положительная динамика зафиксирована в ряде крупных сегментов: • Складская техника (+176,3%) • Сельскохозяйственная техник…

❤48👍41🔥36

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @solnyshkina_oksana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Солнышкина Оксана” (@solnyshkina_oksana), 9,847 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solnyshkina_oksana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.