Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лизинг для профессионалов CarleasingPro

Channel

Лизинг для профессионалов CarleasingPro

@CarleasingPro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,035subscribers

+135 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357647314
TypeChannel
Username@CarleasingPro
DescriptionПолностью субъективные мониторинг и оценка рынка лизинга и его участников. Выводы и оценки основаны на домыслах, слухах, догадках, знакомствах и личном опыте. Контакты @moscowleasing
Created7 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CarleasingPro

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8787,0426,9606 August 2026 — 6,900 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,897 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,888 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,878 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,886 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,898 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,910 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,908 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,907 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,914 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,933 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,939 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,938 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,935 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,944 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,956 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,020 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,038 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,035 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,042 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,038 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,035 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,033 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,039 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,035 subscribers7,0356 August 20268 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net +135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,853–7,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 10:517,035-4
2 Nov 2026, 12:367,039+6
30 Oct 2026, 04:307,033-2
27 Oct 2026, 11:367,035-3
24 Oct 2026, 01:367,038-4
21 Oct 2026, 01:597,042+7
18 Oct 2026, 08:597,035-3
15 Oct 2026, 11:567,038+18
12 Oct 2026, 19:517,020+64
6 Oct 2026, 02:196,956+12
29 Sept 2026, 02:226,944+9
19 Sept 2026, 13:006,935-3
15 Sept 2026, 01:176,938-1
11 Sept 2026, 10:406,939+6
6 Sept 2026, 20:416,933+19
2 Sept 2026, 10:176,914+7
30 Aug 2026, 00:136,907-1
26 Aug 2026, 16:086,908-2
23 Aug 2026, 09:426,910+12
19 Aug 2026, 19:046,898first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 7,035 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.356%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held116 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total70,570
Reactions total88
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 18:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,470
Videos
≈13
Links
≈5,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 37 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍18192.8%
👎147.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.31%
5 of 116 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,230
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,430
over 111 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqEUj8U2VyrpEq7RaCTcufgncfwL97oD6ooYkB114 August 202614 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEUj8U2YRy8dJwrkpsfLsKCijXfYXyCN4cQtZ15 August 20265 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEUj8U2h7GrPZ4QEY4CeJidM3KPdfmKCDcEgy110 August 202610 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEUj8U2jXqYagidbKsDhur2n3JUkPFYtRv9ph111 November 202611 November 2026
CQH36pWzJqEUj8U2jZsKsBL2qCcbTRBy1QCYYkFWdSuVEH119 August 202619 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (26.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC500 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Европлан vs Т-Лизинг - замечу, что сравнение идет не абсолютных показателей (здесь ЕП в 2 раза больше ТЛа), а относительных - т.е. динамики - видно, что компании плюс минус на одной волне (просто у ТЛа не было на полдник Альфамобиля). Второй граф - в абсолютных числах

11 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC507 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

А вот СБЛ, на мой взгляд, сейчас идет хуже рынка

11 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC493 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

А вот это, кстати, сравнение ГПБА vs Каркаде - по сути они идут ровно

11 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC452 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Но вот это просто завораживающее зрелище. Европлан не просто обгоняет рынок, а прям летит ракетой к новым достижениям

11 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC428 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Графики про то, кто из топ ЛК "обгоняет рынок", а кто отстает от рынка. Вот братья-близнецы ГПБА-Каркаде, сначала отставали, а теперь стали обгонять рынок

11 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC963 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJqEUj8U2jXqYagidbKsDhur2n3JUkPFYtRv9phVideo

⚡️ ЛИЗИНГ ФИЗИКА⚡️ ПИТЕР, ОСТАЛОСЬ 10 МЕСТ 🤯 Мы уже бронируем зал побольше и ждем лизинговые компании, банки и дилеров! Кирилл Ларин, основатель Appruvo, расскажет: 🟡всё о рынке авто с пробегом в США 🟡как финансруются эти машины 🟡почему 20% всех сделок будут выдаваться в лизинг 🎤 Среди спикеров будут представители: СБЕР, Авто.ру, СВОЙ Банк, Pango Cars, и специальные гости! 📍 Санкт-Петербург, отель Corinthia 📅2…

👍4

11 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC908 viewsread 11 November 2026

На мой взгляд АдвансТраку ходить в суд имеет смысл только против неподготовленных ИПшников. Примеры удачных для АдвансТрака судов показывают, что основа успеха - неявка ответчика в суд A40-99635/2025 (ИП Калашникова, Калашников): Взыскана задолженность и неустойка (ответчики не явились, отзыв не представили) A40-103667/2025 (ИП Соболевский, Соболевская): Взыскана задолженность и неустойка (аналогично, ответчики не…

11 Nov 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,180 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Не очень понимаю, почему в отношении Балтийского лизинга некоторые пишут, что дескать у него отчетность за 3 квартал норм, как минимум, не хуже предыдущей https://t.me/mkot_finance/6490 На мой взгляд как раз в 3м то квартале у Балтийского лизинга явно проявились настоящие признаки кризиса, и к тому есть несколько явных «звоночков». И это даже не говоря про снижение выручки и прибыли – эти обстоятельства как раз я не…

👍12👎2

10 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,290 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В общем, ничего не поделаешь, пришлось вспоминать Excel и сравнивать данные между собой, и вот оно что получилось (сравнивать-то надо было не год к году, а квартал к кварталу) ИБО на горизонте год ничего особенного не разглядеть, а вот межквартальные перетоки более, чем информативны, итак ….

👍4

10 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,400 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Сначала комментаторы вполне себе комплиментарно отработали долгожданную отчетность Балтийского лизинга. И, радуясь, «что живой», уже никто особо и не интересуется, а где та самая мега-сделка на миллиарды рублей, которая так взволновала поклонников Балтлиза по итогам 2ого квартала (ИБО цифры для непосвященных выглядели, как если бы БЛ взял да отогнал около 14 млрд.рублей на связанную сторону), и которую заместитель ге…

👍5

10 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 11 November 2026

Эвона, оно как кучно пошли новости по лизинговой группе М.Я.Жарницкого Отстраненно объективные Лизинг в России https://t.me/leasingnewsrussia/5282 и newcomer Лизинг по Делу https://t.me/leasingpodelu/62 а также трогательные в своей наивности облигационеры https://t.me/marythebond/5509 и https://max.ru/mkot_finance/AaHEqlCQEWU

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @CarleasingPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@CarleasingPro edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTCAnonymous Poll173 voters

Выберите сторону из предыдущего поста, кто прав

  1. Клиент -28% годовых норм - я потом еще возьму31%
  2. ЛК - 80% годовых ибо «свобода договора»16%
  3. Мне посмотреть54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTCAnonymous Poll211 voters

Вобьем гвоздь в крышку гроба нарратива про доп услуги ЕП? Какая доля настоящих доп услуг в допдоходах ЕП?

  1. Больше 90%1%
  2. 75%-90%2%
  3. 50-75%11%
  4. 25-50%13%
  5. 10-25%11%
  6. 5-10%13%
  7. 1-4%8%
  8. 00%
  9. Мне посмотреть42%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTCAnonymous Poll202 voters

Как считаете, чего больше в непроцентном доходе ЕП?

  1. Неустойки и доходы от сальдо41%
  2. От настоящих доп услуг шины, топливные карты, организация техосмотра, мойка и чистка, тахограф и др19%
  3. Поровну8%
  4. Мне посмотреть34%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTCAnonymous Poll193 voters

Дайте оценку публичным высказываниям И.Ноготкова в канале для инвесторов. Как вам представляется, его откровенность полезна или вредна для имиджа?

  1. Очень полезна9%
  2. В целом хорошо12%
  3. Не вредна и не полезна10%
  4. Скорее вредна11%
  5. Это фейл14%
  6. Мне посмотреть47%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лизинг в России
@leasingnewsrussia · 21,578
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 October 2026
АСН — Агентство Страховых Новостей
@asnnewsru · 19,385
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лизинг для профессионалов CarleasingPro” (@CarleasingPro), 7,035 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CarleasingPro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.