2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 584–586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 03:19
585
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:16
585
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
51.0%
avg views ÷ 585 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held
20 (22 May 2026 – 24 July 2026)
Views total
1,492
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
200
Videos
28
Links
135
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
72
69.2%
❤
18
17.3%
🔥
13
12.5%
👎
1
0.962%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Радоваться ли снижению ставки?
ЦБ удивил всех, кроме нескольких безнадежных оптимистов, которые верили в снижение ставки несмотря на внушительный набор негативных факторов.
Чем нам грозит текущее снижение?
Несмотря на традиционное обещание
принимать дальнейшие решения по ключевой ставке в зависимости от динамики инфляции и инфляционных ожиданий, а также от оценки рисков со стороны внутренних и внешних условий
на пре…
🔴 Сегодняшнее решение Совета директоров Банка России по ключевой ставке комментирует главный экономист «Эксперт РА» Антон Табах:
❗️Самое важное – не то, что «ключ» снизили на 25 базовых пунктов сейчас, а то, что очень сильно ужесточили ожидания по инфляции до конца года и ставке на второе полугодие и 2027 год.
Инфляция будет выше из-за топливного дефицита. Плюс в заявлении отдельно указано на бюджетную ситуацию и н…
По ставке ЦБ.
Чуда не будет.
На заседании на этой неделе снижения ключевой ставки точно не случится. Инфляция подросла, а инфляционные ожидания очень сильно выросли — регулятор не может позволить себе ослабить политику.
➡️ Сценарии:
🔹 Оптимистичный: оставят 14,25% .
🔹 Реалистичный: вернут 14,5%.
Друзья, хочу поделиться мыслями по материалу Ивана Махортова о кризисе в лизинге.
Иван проделал огромную работу, написав глубокое эссе. В отличие от стандартных пресс-релизов РА «Эксперт» (где годами от признанных лизинговых авторитетов звучалоодно и то же: «повышать проникновение любой ценой», «необходимость гос программ и субсидия для стимулирования», «цифровизация» и в последние годы «нужна ключевая ставка 12%»), …
Лизинговый рынок в I квартале 2026: стагнация, убытки и взрыв реструктуризаций
ЦБ опубликовал данные 41 лизинговой компании за I квартал 2026. Сравниваем с аналогичным периодом прошлого года.
Главный вывод: новый бизнес просел умеренно (-13,6% г/г), но качество портфеля сильно ухудшилось – реструктуризации выросли в 2,3 раза, а чистая прибыль рынка стала отрицательной впервые за долгое время.
📊 Ключевые цифры (I кв…
С помощью ИИ-ассистента перевел и прочитал книгу Dr Carol S. Dweck Mindset. Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential.
ИИ помог мне собрать и основные тезисы, которому делюсь с вами.
Главная идея книги: то, как человек объясняет способности, сильно влияет на его жизнь. Если считать интеллект, талант и характер фиксированными, человек начинает защищать образ “я умный/способный”. Если считать способности разв…
Что решил Банк России?
Оценим игру нашего вратаря.
На пресс-конференции, а точнее в сессии вопросов СМИ, Набиулина подтвердила то, о чем я писал в ожидании заседания: на столе лежало три решения. Выбирали между сохранением ставки, снижением до 14,00% и снижением до 14,25%. Любое из решений имело свои обоснования и проиллюстрировало бы текущее настроение Банка России. После данных по инфляционным ожиданиям и недельн…
👓👓👓👓👓👓Волна дефолтов на российском облигационном рынке с 2024 г. уже сравнялась по количеству с 2014–2016 гг. и даже может их превзойти, но по-прежнему очень далека от 2008–2009 гг., пишут «Ведомости» со ссылкой на обзор УК «Эйлер».
📆 Первые дефолты на рынке корпоративных облигаций произошли в 2003–2007 гг. Не смогли расплатиться по своим бондам три компании - «РусЛАД», «Стройметресурс» и ВИНАП. Общий объем неисполн…
🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍🔍Доброе утро. Обещанный бонус ко вчерашнему обзору –
– новые рэнкинги лизинговых компаний по итогам I квартала 2026 года
🥇 По итогам I кв. 2026 года наибольший объем нового бизнеса приходится на ГК «Газпромбанк Лизинг» – 70 млрд рублей.
🥈 Второе место с совокупным объемом порядка 43 млрд рублей занимает группа лизинговых компаний «Альфа-Банка» (ГК «Европлан» и «Альфа-Лизинг»).
🥉 Третью позицию занимает компани…
10 июня планирую посетить конференцию Лизингового союза, посвящённую теме «Мошенничество на финансовых рынках. Безопасность лизинговой деятельности». Выше представлена программа мероприятия. Буду рад встрече с коллегами, чтобы обсудить тему, всегда сохраняющую свою актуальность для лизинговых компаний.
👍9🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @andryushschenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Верили ли вы, что в ближайшее время могут появиться лизинговые экосистемы со знаменитыми Хабами и иными сопутствующими сервисами вокруг лизинга?
Верю. В том числе потому что есть пример Балт_лиза и АльфаЛизинга25%
Не верю. История с хабами - это очередной хайп. Потому что история про «подписку» больше не хайп.75%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алексей Андрющенко” (@andryushschenko), 585 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andryushschenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
