Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sofffikkaaaa

Channel

sofffikkaaaa

@sofffikkaaaa

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-7,482 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001590218301
TypeChannel
Username@sofffikkaaaa
Created24 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sofffikkaaaa

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@sofffikkaaaa/8042 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC@sofffikkka/23384 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC1.005 minutes
@sofffikkaaaa/8048 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC@sofffikkka/23444 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC1.0011 minutes
@sofffikkaaaa/8049 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC@sofffikkka/23454 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC1.0010 minutes
@sofffikkaaaa/8054 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC@sofffikkka/23504 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC1.004 minutes
@sofffikkaaaa/8056 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC@sofffikkka/23524 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC1.0072 seconds
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sofffikkka5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @sofffikkaaaa — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

47,4863,7456 August 2026 — 7,486 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,486 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,485 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,477 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,468 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,433 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,422 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,411 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,399 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,392 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,386 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,359 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,365 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,358 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,385 subscribers2 October 2026 — 7,463 subscribers13 November 2026 — 4 subscribers6 August 202613 November 2026
17 measurements spanning 99 days, net -7,482. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 01:064-7,459
2 Oct 2026, 14:397,463+78
16 Sept 2026, 06:557,385+27
12 Sept 2026, 23:397,358-7
9 Sept 2026, 05:357,365+6
3 Sept 2026, 23:587,359-27
31 Aug 2026, 16:137,386-6
28 Aug 2026, 20:137,392-7
26 Aug 2026, 04:347,399-12
23 Aug 2026, 12:187,411-11
19 Aug 2026, 16:387,422-11
16 Aug 2026, 14:067,433-35
12 Aug 2026, 21:547,468-9
9 Aug 2026, 20:317,477-8
6 Aug 2026, 11:437,485-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,486no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:447,486first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,592 reactions across 40 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥92225.7%
🔥84223.4%
😍56415.7%
💋2827.85%
🤣2527.02%
💯2416.71%
😁1554.32%
🤝1393.87%
💔962.67%
💅671.87%
✍150.418%
👀140.39%
😭30.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,592 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈1,520 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

тем временем я сегодня все чётенько добрала даже пришлось углеводы дополнительным приемом пищи добирать, добирала сложными углями, поэтому ощущение, что объелась, как слоняра

🔥44💋19💯12❤‍🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,530 views105 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

мне очень нравится эта картинка! многие люди даже не представляют, какое красивое тело у них может быть) уровень качества жизни сюда же но вот незадача, нужно работать над собой 🤓

💯52😍32🔥17❤‍🔥4

25 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,890 views88 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

💯52❤‍🔥21😍14🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,900 views153 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

только посмотрите на этого перца 😍

💋87❤‍🔥45🔥16😍5

25 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈2,040 views83 reactionsread 28 August 2026

капец цвет идеальный, я уже забыла свой родной

❤‍🔥55💯18😁6🔥4

25 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈2,030 views79 reactionsread 28 August 2026

«Истерика» - салон красоты

😁54🔥15💅9❤‍🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈2,010 views130 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍88💯15🔥13💋11❤‍🔥2🤣1

25 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,970 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026

я была в истерике

😁40💅6❤‍🔥3🔥2

24 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC≈2,200 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍41🤣16❤‍🔥10🔥6💯5

24 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈2,200 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥39❤‍🔥11😍10💯9🤣7

24 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,090 views93 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥60💯15😍13🔥5

24 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈2,050 views101 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥58😍24🔥12💯7

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @sofffikkaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KUSKUS🤍🫂
@alexeevvaammm · 18,804
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 October 2026
Жизнь обычного Чудища
@yourbeastyslife · 57,314
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
МАЛЫШКА ПО
@polyaam · 27,757
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 9 September 2026
Цитаты преподавателей
@quotes_teacher · 47,281
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
alexeevvaamm🤍
@alexeevvvaamm · 75,039
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Masha Poche
@maria_pochenyk · 51,760
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sofffikkaaaa” (@sofffikkaaaa), 4 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sofffikkaaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.