Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نشانه شناسی اجتماعی

Channel

نشانه شناسی اجتماعی

@social_semiotics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,159subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185355037
TypeChannel
Username@social_semiotics
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/social_semiotics

Growth

1,1561,1591,157.56 August 2026 — 1,156 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,156 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,157 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,156–1,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:381,159+2
10 Aug 2026, 08:021,157+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:211,156no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:081,156first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 1,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
175
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,226
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC89 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

نقدی کوتاه ولی مهم و خواندنی👇 https://www.instagram.com/p/DbntpPOloNU/?igsh=dHgwb2o3OHUzenB4

Signed Kamran Paknejad

29 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC165 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @irCDSVideo

مدرسه بهاره نشانه شناسی دکتر حسین سرفراز نشانه شناسی و فرهنگ بهار ۱۴۰۴ @irCDS

Signed Kamran Paknejad

29 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC145 viewsread 6 August 2026

📝 زبانشناسی شناختی و روانشناسی زبان Cognitive Linguistics and Psycholinguistics 🏷 شباهت‌ها و تفاوت‌ها زبانشناسی شناختی و روانشناسی زبان هر دو با رابطه‌ی زبان و ذهن سروکار دارند. در زبانشناسی شناختی به مطالعه این موضوع می‌پردازند که زبان چگونه ساختار و عملکرد ذهن انسان را منعکس می‌کند، اما روانشناسی زبان به این موضوع می‌پردازد که پردازش زبان چگونه در ذهن انجام می‌شود. روانشناسی زبان شامل موضوعاتی نظیر تولید و درک

Signed Kamran Paknejad

29 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC114 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @irCDSFile

#صوت مدرسه بهاره نشانه شناسی دکتر حمیدرضا شعیری نشانه شناسی و ادبیات بهار ۱۴۰۴ @irCDS

Signed Kamran Paknejad

24 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC217 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @neurobiology_of_artVideo

به تفاوت حرکت نخست با حرکت آخر توجه کنید. تنها در عرض چند دقیقه تقلید از حرکت نخستین بدل به نسخه ای کاملا متفاوت در حرکت نفر آخر می شود. مشابه این تجربه حرکتی بارها در حیطه زبانی و نوشتاری هم تکرار شده و به نتایج مشابهی رسیده است. حال بسنجید سرنوشت سنت هایی را که در خلال سده ها و هزاره های پیشین در سنتی شفاهی به جوامع امروزی رسیده اند! ... حتا سنت های نوشتاری و حک شده نیز با تفاسیر و خوانش های متفاوت در افراد مختلف و

Signed Kamran Paknejad

21 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC240 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bookcityccPhoto

. انتشارات سخن منتشرکرد: کتاب چیستی ایران، کاوشی نشانه‌شناختی است پیرامون مفهوم ایران در گفتمان هزاروصد سالۀ سلطنت در جغرافیای جیحون تا فُرات پس از اسلام. ایران در این گفتمان، یک سپهر فرهنگی درتنیده با سیاست است؛ و نه یک قلمرو جغرافیایی یا حکمرانی صرف. سخن از یک سپهر نشانه‌شناختی است که در آن یک هویت تمدنی، فرهنگی و سیاسی خود را با نام ایران بازتولید و ارزش‌گذاری می‌کند. فضایی درهم‌بافته از شش نظام نشانه‌ایِ جغرافیا

Signed Kamran Paknejad

17 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC256 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @neurobiology_of_artPhoto

🔸آیا افراد باهوش لزوما درست تر از دیگران تصمیم گیری و داوری می کنند؟ 🆔@neurobiology_of_art

Signed Kamran Paknejad

10 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC380 viewsread 6 August 2026
File

📑 افسانه زبان: چرا زبان غریزی نیست؟ (فهرست مطالب و صفحات آغازین)

Signed Kamran Paknejad

10 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC336 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌄‌ افسانۀ زبان: چرا زبان غریزی نیست؟ ✍ ویویان ایوانز، ترجمه شاهو مجیدی 📰 نویسه پارسی در دهه‌های گذشته نظریۀ غالب این بوده است که انسان با توانایی اولیۀ زبانی متولد می‌شود. ایوانز با ارائۀ شواهدی نشان می‌دهد که نگرش غریزی به زبان و دستور همگانیِ ذاتی که پیش‌تر توسط نوام چامسکی در زبانشناسی مطرح شده بود، افسانه‌ای بیش نیست. ایوانز با بهره‌گیری از تفکرات نوین در علوم شناختی نشان می‌دهد که زبان نه یک توانایی غریزی، بل

Signed Kamran Paknejad

10 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC200 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🦜 تکامل زبان؛ هم ندا با پرندگان 📜 نظریه داروین درباره ارتباط آواز پرندگان و زبان انسان چه می‌گوید؟ تحقیقات جدید درباره این موضوع چه نتایجی را نشان می‌دهند؟ چه شباهت و تفاوت‌هایی بین آواز پرندگان و دیگر روش‌های ارتباطی در طبیعت وجود دارد؟ 🎞 تماشای ویدئو در YouTube | کلیک ➕ لطفاً با عضویت در صفحات لینگویی کلاب | Linguiclub از فعالیت‌های ما حمایت کنید. 🏷 تشکل همگام

Signed Kamran Paknejad

3 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔸دانشمندان می‌گویند با فهم زبان نهنگ قصد دارند زبان فرازمینی‌ها را بفهمند این نخستین تبادل ارتباطات میان انسان و نهنگ‌های گوژپشت است که بر اساس «زبان» این نهنگ‌ها برقرار می‌شود دانشمندان می‌گویند گفت‌وگوی میان انسان و وال یا به اصطلاح متداول آن نهنگ، ممکن است روزی به ما کمک کند تا بتوانیم با بیگانگان فرازمینی صحبت کنیم. به گزارش اسپیس، پژوهشگران با بررسی سیستم‌های ارتباطی نهنگ‌های گوژپشت تلاش می‌کنند نحوه تشخیص و ت

Signed Kamran Paknejad

28 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC365 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @irCDSVideo

سیالیت معنا: درمان روان 🔹 حمیدرضا شعیری، استاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس: 🔸معنا امری است پنهان و انتزاعی یعنی نمی‌توان آن را نشان داد، نمی‌شود، با دوربین عکس آن را گرفت، دوم معنا در حرکت جابه‌جا می‌شود و سوم تغییر؛ «معنا یعنی تغییر معنا»، این نکته بسیار مهم است. 🔻هرگاه جایی چیزی در وجود ما، نه در سطح مادی نه در سطح جسمی، نه در سطح صورت، هرگاه چیزی در وجود ما و در عمق و در عمق تغییر کند و ما آن تغییر را حس کنیم یعنی تکا

Signed Kamran Paknejad

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @social_semiotics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,023,071 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نشانه شناسی اجتماعی” (@social_semiotics), 1,159 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/social_semiotics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.