Channel
@slonomoikaevent
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
324subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002309869406 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @slonomoikaevent |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/slonomoikaevent |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 324 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 325 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:19 | 325 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (11 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 574 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 46.2% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5303216864510353332 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| custom 6328007932625553184 | 1 | 3.85% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
прошли почти сутки, я успел покушать поспать, поработать, зайдя в обед я был приятно удивлен - мой recursive self improvement неплохо справляется и с обновлением себя и с LB этой соревки https://github.com/AlexWortega/OpenRsi
custom 63280079326255531841
Американский регулятор потерял терпение Глава NHTSA Джонатан Моррисон написал разработчикам роботакси письмо, в котором перечислил случаи за последние месяцы: беспилотники заезжали на места работы экстренных служб, блокировали пути скорых и пожарных, не реагировали на мигалки, сигнальные конусы, дым и огонь. "Это неприемлемо. Скажу прямо: беспилотник, который не умеет безопасно взаимодействовать с экстренными служба…
👍1
Владимир Путин подписал закон о регулировании ИИ в России. Крупные сайты и платформы с аудиторией от 500 тысяч человек обязаны маркировать контент, созданный нейросетями. Государство будет разрабатывать суверенные и национальные модели ИИ и субсидировать их разработчиков. В госсистемах и чувствительных сервисах обяжут использовать только отечественные нейронки. @banksta
custom 53032168645103533324
🎥 Более 500 авторов молодежных медиапроектов, истории о героях прошлого и настоящего, разговор о том, почему служение Отечеству начинается с памяти В Москве стартовала всероссийская конференция «Служение Отечеству как призвание молодежи». Она объединила участников федерального проекта «Во имя героев». Как молодые люди создают проекты, которые вдохновляют целое поколение, — смотрите в сюжете медиацентра Минпросвещен…
В Макао произошёл необычный случай: полиция сопроводила робота Unitree G1 после того, как он напугал пожилую женщину. Инцидент произошёл вечером возле жилого комплекса в районе Патане. 70-летняя женщина, отвлёкшись на телефон, внезапно заметила за собой движущегося робота, что вызвало у неё сильный испуг. Свидетели сняли на видео, как женщина эмоционально выговаривает роботу, а тот поднимает руки, будто извиняясь. П…
🤣4
📃 Депутаты Госдумы на пленарном заседании приняли в первом чтении правительственный проект базового закона о поддержке развития технологии искусственного интеллекта (ИИ). Документ разработан в целях создания правовых условий для ускоренного развития и внедрения больших фундаментальных моделей ИИ в стране, обеспечения государственной технологической независимости, безопасности личности, общества и государства при испо…
❤2
Этот день настал: открываем регистрацию на 💙💙💙💙💙 Вам рассказываем первым. ➡️12-13 сентября, Loft Hall #8 Хардовые технические доклады. Выступления учёных и популяризаторов науки. Робототехника и DIY, Burning Talks и много полезного общения. Всё, что вы любите, — два дня. И два вечера концертов, караоке и неформальной тусовки. Отмечайте в календарях большууууууую дату. Регистрируйтесь сами и зовите друзей. До встр…
❤2
Ребята, всем привет! 💚 Уже завтра стоимость билетов на PyCon Russia 2026 станет выше. Сегодня — последний день, когда можно приобрести билет по текущей цене. А давайте заодно устроим небольшую перекличку 😊 Кто уже точно едет на PyCon? Напишите ниже, из какого вы города! 👇 Очень интересно посмотреть, сколько нас соберётся в этом году и откуда вы приедете. А если вы пока думаете, ехать или нет, предлагаем немного …
11 июля в Петербурге ждем все направления в IT на Летний ProIT Fest VIII. Это ваш шанс высказаться – наравне со 100+ спикерами из крупнейших компаний! 📍Санкт‑Петербург, пространство SENO: ⚪️10+ IT-community будут учить вас хорошему днем и плохому вечером. ⚪️20+ комнат под камерные форматы, где вы вместе со спикерами сможете творить контент абсолютно по каждой экспертизе в IT. Здесь можно найти друзей, свою любовь, …
🔗 Мы съездили на ICLR 2026, перепридумали споттер для Яндекс Дропс, написали софт для шеринга GPU и научили модели понимать, кто кому брат и сват. Всё это и многое другое — в новом ML-дайджесте 🚙 Куда сходить ⚪️ 23 июня — вебинар о том, как построить память и поиск AI-агента с помощью одной СУБД с бесплатным тарифом. Инженеры Яндекса покажут, как пользоваться Serverless YDB. На рабочем примере разберут, где в агент…
👍3
Sber AI Lab приглашает вас на открытый научный семинар: 📆 сегодня, четверг, 18 июня в 17:00. 📆На семинаре выступит: Иван Карпухин (Sber AI Lab) ➡️Тема доклада: LLM-рецензент на примерах: нужен ли нам эксперт? 🔘На семинаре мы рассмотрим несколько научных статей в области Deep Learning и проанализируем качество автоматически сгенерированных обзоров и рецензий с помощью LLM. 🔘Обсудим, какие аспекты научных работ …
👍5
🌸Papers with Code жив!🌸 #nlp #nlp_papers #про_nlp HuggingFace официально воскресили легендарный ресурс — и даже добавили новый функционал! Теперь наконец-то можно отслеживать - растущий тренд в направлениях ИИ-исследований - следить таргетно за статьями в наших любимых отраслях: World Models, Agents, RL, Robotics, и многих других! Вернулись вкладки с бенчмарками и метриками по разным отраслям (и их много!) и все с…
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @slonomoikaevent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,061,593 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@slonomoikaevent named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Слономойка Вестник” (@slonomoikaevent), 324 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slonomoikaevent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.