Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Silicon Brain | جامعه هوش مصنوعی

Channel

Silicon Brain | جامعه هوش مصنوعی

@silicon_brain

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,740subscribers

+264 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001221527497
TypeChannel
Username@silicon_brain
Descriptionمغز سیلیکونی|جامعه هوش مصنوعی اولین رسانه فنی و به روز هوش مصنوعی در تلگرام گروه بحث و تبادل نظر: https://t.me/+SWbgmMZt0XU0MGY0 مطالب و بحث های بیشتر در اینستاگرام: https://www.instagram.com/silicon_brain/ ارتباط با ادمین: @silicon_brain_admin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/silicon_brain

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,4767,7447,6106 August 2026 — 7,476 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,479 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,491 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,503 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,508 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,511 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,529 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,526 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,537 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,539 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,556 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,713 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,714 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,720 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,722 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,729 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,724 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,733 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,728 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,734 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,744 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,736 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,734 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,740 subscribers7,7406 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,436–7,784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 21:167,740+6
7 Nov 2026, 09:257,734-2
1 Nov 2026, 04:587,736-8
29 Oct 2026, 02:447,744+10
23 Oct 2026, 17:177,734+6
20 Oct 2026, 17:587,728-5
17 Oct 2026, 20:387,733+9
15 Oct 2026, 06:517,724-5
12 Oct 2026, 08:377,729+7
5 Oct 2026, 15:167,722+2
28 Sept 2026, 04:417,720+6
18 Sept 2026, 17:017,714+1
11 Sept 2026, 08:367,713+157
6 Sept 2026, 08:207,556+17
1 Sept 2026, 21:257,539+2
30 Aug 2026, 05:387,537+11
27 Aug 2026, 02:367,526-3
23 Aug 2026, 21:377,529+18
20 Aug 2026, 07:137,511+3
16 Aug 2026, 21:337,508first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 7,740 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held91 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total42,460
Reactions total587
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 14:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈132
Links
≈594

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,342 reactions across 90 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍79659.3%
❤29822.2%
😁1208.94%
😢251.86%
👎231.71%
💔191.42%
🔥120.894%
😐100.745%
🤣90.671%
👌50.373%
🤷‍♂50.373%
🍌40.298%
👏40.298%
😍20.149%
❤‍🔥10.075%
🎃10.075%
👀10.075%
👻10.075%
😱10.075%
🙏10.075%
4 further kinds40.298%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC328 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

انتروپیک دو مدل جدیدش یعنی Claude Fable 5.2 و Mythos 5.2 رو معرفی کرده مدل‌هایی که طبق ادعای این شرکت، نسبت به نسل قبلی حدود ۳۰٪ سریع‌تر و ارزان‌تر هستن. این دو مدل از یک Base Model مشترک استفاده می‌کنن، اما Fable محدودیت‌ها و لایه‌های ایمنی سخت‌گیرانه‌تری (Safety Guardrails) داره. هزینه‌ی استفاده ▫️هر یک میلیون Input Token: حدود ۸ دلار ▫️هر یک میلیون Output Token: حدود ۴۰ دلار نتایج در Coding Benchmarkها، مدل Fable…

👍2

10 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC636 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026

ریپو No AI Slop هدفش اینه متن‌هایی رو که با کمک AI نوشته شدن، از کلیشه‌ها و الگوهای تکراری رایج در خروجی مدل‌های زبانی پاک کنه. احتمالاً این مدل جمله‌ها رو زیاد دیدین: «موضوع فقط X نیست، بلکه Y هم هست.» «چیزی که هیچ‌کس بهتون نمی‌گه اینه که...» «آینده در راه نیست؛ همین الان اینجاست!» «این اتفاق نقطه‌ی عطفی در مسیر تحول...» این‌ها نمونه‌هایی از الگوهاییه که مدل‌های زبانی زیاد ازشون استفاده می‌کنن و به‌مرور باعث شدن خی…

👍4❤2

9 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC882 views28 reactionsread 11 November 2026

سُست عنصری جن‌سن هوانگ کار دستش داده!

😁19🤣9

9 Nov 2026, 14:23 UTC930 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

‏تیم Nous Research مدل Qwen3 رو fine-tune کرده تا میزان تبلیغات و پروپگاندای طرفدار چین رو از ۲۲٪ برسونه به ۱٪. همگی میدونیم که مدل‌های open-source چینی در حال حاضر قوی‌ترین مدل‌هایی هستن که می‌تونید به صورت local اجرا کنید. اما یه گیر بزرگ وجود داره این مدل‌ها با bias سیاسی داخلی عرضه میشن یعنی روی موضوعاتی مثل دموکراسی، آزادی بیان و حریم خصوصی، طبق مواضع حکومت چین جواب‌ها رو میدن تیم Nous Research اومدن مدل Qwen3.…

👍12❤5😁2

9 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,000 views44 reactionsread 11 November 2026

طرف پروفسور AI تو یکی از بهترین دانشگاه‌های دنیاست، بعد گفته اگه می‌خواین با من ارتباط بگیرین، هیچ بخشی از محتوایی که می‌فرستین نباید با AI نوشته شده باشه! جالبه که دقیقاً تو حوزه‌ای فعالیت می‌کنه که هدفش توسعه همین تکنولوژی‌هاست، اما هنوز حاضر نیست AI رو به‌عنوان یه ابزار کاربردی به رسمیت بشناسه. کسی نیست بهش بگه حاجی، از این ابزار ها باید یه جایی استفاده کنیم، نه اینکه صرفاً درباره‌شون ریسرچ کنیم😂

😁30👎8👍5❤1

8 Nov 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,030 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

روش ‏Latent Sparse Attention - راهکاری برای سریع‌تر شدن LLMها در پردازش Contextهای طولانی وقتی AI Agentها، مخصوصاً Coding Agentها، روی Repositoryهای بزرگ کار می‌کنن، حجم Contextشون ممکنه به میلیون‌ها توکن برسه. تو این مقیاس، محاسبات Attention به یکی از گلوگاه‌های اصلی Inference تبدیل می‌شه. حالا محققان Prefrontal AI و ETH Zurich تکنیکی به اسم Latent Sparse Attention (LSA) معرفی کردن که با هوشمندتر کردن فرآیند جست‌…

👍7❤5

8 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC957 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

تو داشبورد TypeSafe AI دیدم که برای مدل هایی مثل jev-latest برای هر کاربر ماهانه 5دلار اعتبار رایگان داده. 5 دلار خیلیه برای این نوع مدل ها لینک @silicon_brain | از هوش مصنوعی عقب نمانید

👍6🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 21:17 UTC≈1,070 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026

توی بعضی از تیم‌ها، همیشه یه نفر هست که کار بقیه رو جمع می‌کنه و نمی‌ذاره کاری روی زمین بمونه. به‌مرور بقیه اعضای تیم به حضور اون فرد عادت می‌کنن و ناخودآگاه کمتر مسئولیت می‌پذیرن و کمتر تلاش می‌کنن. در واقع، عملکرد تیم بیش از حد به چند نفر خاص وابسته می‌شه. به این وضعیت Co-Adaptation می‌گن. حالا برای جلوگیری از این اتفاق، می‌شه بعضی از اعضای تیم رو به‌صورت تصادفی و موقت از فرآیند کار خارج کرد تا بقیه مجبور بشن مستق…

👍29❤12

7 Nov 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

مدل GPT-6 Cyber - تخصصی برای Cybersecurity شرکت OpenAI مدل جدید GPT-6 Cyber رو معرفی کرده که برخلاف Chatbotهای عمومی، به‌طور اختصاصی برای کارهای Cybersecurity طراحی شده از پیدا کردن و تست کردن Vulnerabilityها گرفته تا کمک به رفع اون‌ها. نتایج ▫️شناسایی ۸۱ آسیب‌پذیری با شدت بالا در Firefox که بعداً توسط Mozilla برطرف شدن. ▫️بازتولید ۱۷۲۴ باگ در Linux Kernel و ساخت Exploit عملی برای ۹۴۸ مورد. ▫️کسب امتیاز ۴۸.۵٪ در Ex…

👍4❤2

7 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC967 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026

اینکه گزینه های فان داریم، دلیل نمیشه همتون اونارو انتخاب کنین 😂

😁16❤2

4 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,420 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026

20 سال بعد، چطور به آدمای اون موقع بگیم در مورد لذت برنامه نویسی؟ :(

👍16💔7

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @silicon_brain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@silicon_brain edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @silicon_brain as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTCAnonymous Poll99 voters

بهترین کانال هوش مصنوعی کل تاریخ

  1. Silicon Brain33%
  2. گزینه اول2%
  3. گزینه دوم4%
  4. 😂61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTCAnonymous Poll158 voters

این کانال... (میتونی چند گزینه انتخاب کنی)

  1. مطالب روز AI رو سریع پوشش میده69%
  2. مطالب فنی مناسبی بحث میشه55%
  3. انتقال تجربه مفیدی داره37%
  4. هیچکدام16%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

هوش مصنوعی در پژوهش
@AI_in_Research · 305,648
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
مجله هوش مصنوعی
@HomeAI · 32,870
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
DLeX: AI Python
@ai_python · 21,294
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
مغز آینده |NextBrain
@NextBrain_ir · 19,745
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 September 2026
آقای هوش مصنوعی
@MrArtificialintelligence · 20,689
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
هوش مصنوعی |یادگیری ماشین| علم داده
@Ai_Tv · 26,540
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
Machine Learning | یادگیری ماشین
@MachineLearning_ir · 34,710
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Data Science | علم داده
@DataScience_ir · 50,222
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
آموزش نوین مقاله نویسی با هوش مصنوعی
@tephd · 75,773
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
کتابخانه مهندسی کامپیوتر و پایتون
@programmers_street · 30,945
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
عصر گویش | هوش مصنوعی
@asrgooyeshpardaz · 99,453
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Kooshiar
@kooshiar3 · 25,589
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
اخبار هوش مصنوعی
@Ai_NewsTv · 27,210
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
هوش مصنوعی | AI
@AI_University · 31,914
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
نوستالژی
@nostalzhea · 18,942
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 3 October 2026
Power BI | تحلیل داده | SQL
@PowerBI_ir · 22,001
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Scholarshiphub.ir
@Scholarshiphubir · 30,862
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Programming Resources
@pythony · 19,711
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026
دوره های یودمی را رایگان بیاموزید و گواهینامه بگیرید.
@udemyforever · 30,449
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
اخبار کانادا با پرگار
@canadapargar · 20,627
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 September 2026
نخبگان ایران
@bmniran · 22,153
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Science Documentaries مستندهای علمی
@Documentary20 · 24,160
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
Admission
@Admission_Channel · 18,971
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
اپلای مپ
@ApplyMap · 19,406
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Silicon Brain | جامعه هوش مصنوعی” (@silicon_brain), 7,740 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/silicon_brain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.