Channel
@shreibe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
389subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001102416834 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shreibe |
| Description | Литературные челленджи, письменные практики и прочие полезности для тех, кто пишет или хочет писать. Для связи - @ad_succubus |
| Created | 17 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shreibe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 389 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 389 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
36 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 63.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2020 to 22 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Внезапно? Ещё бы, сама в шоке Так вышло, что за последние несколько дней я часто открывала этот канал, потому что в нем много полезных письменных практик, которые я сейчас и сама использую, и другим рекомендую. Поэтому внутренний голос подсказывает, а почему бы и не возродить? Я все ещё очень много пишу по работе и по любви, и мне есть чем поделиться. Прикрутила комменты и реакции, и смахнула пыль. Привет, друзь…
❤23🔥9👍4
То не успел, то опоздал, то заголовок дурацкий Маркетологи и продавцы дёргают нас за нервы, чтобы вынудить к покупке — все эти красные кнопки с таймером обратного отсчёта, самые выгодные цены и супер акции только сегодня и исключительно для вас. Эти приемы чаще всего оставляют покупателей без денег, с ненужным или даже некачественным товаром, и лёгким привкусом наеба. Не люблю привкус наеба, поэтому делюсь опытом…
Выбирала проекты для подработки, выбрала довольно быстро, но по инерции осталась подписана на несколько каналов с вакансиями для авторов, редакторов, вот это всё. Самый частый запрос у работодателей в моем сегменте — чтобы соискатель был опытный (3-5 лет хорошего релевантного опыта) и чтобы он был бодр-свеж. Выглядит издёвкой. Нужны бодрые — берите новичков, нормальный же человек за пять лет работы с коммерческими т…
Утро началось с газонокосилки под окном, с запаха августа (лето уже немножечко пахнет осенью), с фрирайтинга и красивой картинки на пинтерест (вот она, на аватарочке). Почему бы снова не начать писать? Привет, я Котос и я люблю буковки:)
Channel photo updated
Необычные названия женских профессий из «Толкового словаря названий женщин» Николая Павловича Колесникова (М., 2002): Банкаброшница – работница, обслуживающая прядильную машину, от французского банкаброш (banc a broches, букв. станок со спицами). Мужской профессии – банкаброшник – словари не фиксируют. Бличница – женщина, промышляющая грибами. Слово происходит от блицы, блички 'грибы' (Новгородская и Псковская обла…
Опа, с днем рождения, любимая читалочка:) 8 — моя любимая цифра.
Почти 8 лет Пушкин писал «Евгения Онегина»; 8 детей фигурируют в текстах популярной норвежской писательницы Анне-Катрине Вестли; 8 – это перевернутая бесконечность; 8 в Китае – счастливая цифра, обозначающая богатство и процветание. Майбуку 8 лет! Мы любим русскую классику и детей и надеемся, что бесконечная любовь к литературе будет процветать в нашем сервисе и ваших сердцах!
https://arzamas.academy/materials/958
#жывебеларусь
Поддерживающие книги для Беларуси Привет! Мы с библионапарницей Дашей Зюзиной составили небольшой список поддерживающих книг для тех, кого касаются события в Беларуси. Не важно, кто вы именно или где находитесь, наш список может быть подспорьем, если вы ощущаете тревогу, дискомфорт, грусть, боль и другие сложные переживания. Если вам хочется поддержки и вдохновения, новых мыслей и вариантов, для вас тоже найдется не…
Распишитесь pinned «Я устала от хаоса и хочу порядка. Завела канал, чтобы рассказывать о хаосе, структуре и о том, что между ними. @H1P3RCH405»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shreibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,174,150 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@shreibe named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Распишитесь” (@shreibe), 389 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shreibe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.