Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1 мая

Channel

1 мая

@shershukov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

368subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001292560912
TypeChannel
Username@shershukov
Created12 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shershukov

Growth

3663683676 August 2026 — 366 subscribers6 August 2026 — 366 subscribers13 August 2026 — 368 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:36368+2
6 Aug 2026, 21:01366no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:11366first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.8%
avg views ÷ 368 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 April 202630 July 2026)
Views total117
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4234.4%
2117.2%
😁1512.3%
👏119.02%
💯108.20%
🤯64.92%
🔥54.10%
🤔43.28%
😢21.64%
🤣21.64%
😨10.82%
😱10.82%
🤷‍♀10.82%
🥱10.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Из моей колонки в "Солидарности": ЗАБЕЖАТЬ НЕЛЬЗЯ ОТСТАТЬ Если мы говорим о ФНПР как крупнейшем в России общественном объединении и сегодня, и последние 35 лет, то вот какой мыслью хочется поделиться, глядя на историю организации. В ней, истории, было несколько периодов. С момента создания - с 1991 по 1993 год - новая организация в кратчайший срок пробежала путь от политической поддержки президента Бориса Ельцина

🔥2👍1

15 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC255 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Начну пожалуй печатать здесь свои заметки из "Солидарности" ЛЕГЕНДЫ И МИФЫ ПРОФСОЮЗНОЙ СТРУКТУРЫ Не знаю, как у западных журналистов, а у российских есть одна особенность. Летом они активно интересуются у экспертов (в том числе профсоюзных), при какой температуре можно сократить рабочий день, а ближе к Новому году - спрашивают (по крайней мере спрашивали до недавнего времени), что делать с 31 декабря, не надо ли ег

5👍1

29 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTC234 viewsread 6 August 2026

По прочтению кандидатов ЕР от одномандатных округов - дописываем по Удмуртии Андрея Исаева. А больше из профсоюзных "первачей", похоже, никого. Так ли?

29 Jun 2026, 07:36 UTC235 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Из профсоюзных руководителей первого уровня в региональных списках "Единой России" - Виктор Пинский, Светлана Бессараб, Ярослав Чирков. Одномандатные округа не смотрел еще. Точно проходное место у В.Пинского. По остальным - ситуативно.

🤔31

6 Jun 2026, 06:17 UTC367 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Прочитал интересную интерпретацию: "Петербургский международный экономический форум - место встречи центральной власти и регионов России"... Международный... Много думал )

😁7👍1

28 May 2026, 05:48 UTC440 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Читаю книгу 1952 года про английские профсоюзы. Цитата из выступления Фреда Бромли (генсек Конгресса тред-юнионов) на сессии Генсовета Международной федерации профсоюзов в Амстердаме 5-7 февраля 1925 года: «Мне кажется, что вы можете говорить обо всем, что есть на свете, не испытывая состояния паниче­ского ужаса, крайнего возбуждения и почти дикой свирепости, в которое вы впадаете при обсуждении русских дел... Вы

👍72🤷‍♀1🥱1

21 May 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,060 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Примерно полчаса назад Верховный суд ООН поддержал позицию профсоюзов, отстаивавших тезис о безусловности права на забастовку. Все началось в 2015 году, когда в комитете по применению норм Международной организации труда сторона работодателей поставила эту безусловность под сомнение. Три года назад профсоюзы начали отстаивать эту норму в суде. Сегодня норма подтверждена. Это большое достижение профсоюзов в сфере ме

👍11🤣2

16 May 2026, 18:34 UTC461 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tolk_tolk

Американский политический философ Ричард Рорти ещё в 1997 году в своей книге «Achieving Our Country» предсказывал, чем может закончиться начавшееся уже тогда в Америке противостояние левых и правых (в американской традиции называемых либералами и консерваторами): «Левые отстранились от классовых проблем и вопросов рынка труда, они стали игнорировать свои экономические программы и начали вести культурные войны, котор

👍4😨1

9 May 2026, 07:10 UTC339 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @solidarnost_gztVideo

🎆 С Днем Победы, товарищи! 📣 В этот день весьма кстати главный редактор "Солидарности" Александр Шершуков рассказывает одну небанальную и поучительную историю. ☝️Давайте помнить то, что забывать не надо. 🤝 С праздником! #монологлавредаВидео

👏9👍3🔥3

22 Apr 2026, 10:22 UTC381 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Сегодня, буквально за час до начала отчетно-выборной конференции Федерации профсоюзов Липецкой области отключили электричество. Поэтому слайдов и презентаций не было! Но! Конференции это не помешало. А когда конференция окончилась, председатель Лариса Кудаева предложила хором спеть гимн Федерации. Было круто! Подпевал и снимал поющих делегатов. Могём, когда хотим! ))

👍10😱1

16 Apr 2026, 10:51 UTC404 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В связи с тем, что борец за народное счастье Виктория Боня обратилась к президенту России со словом правды из Монако, наша редакция включает песню Туриянского "Геофизическое танго", начинающуюся со слов: "Во дни разлук и горестных сомнений, как нам писал из Франции Тургенев..." https://vkvideo.ru/video-227389416_456243743?list=5f936a15214e168c12&t=1m59s

😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shershukov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 615,842 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1 мая” (@shershukov), 368 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shershukov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.